World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Patrick Da Costa

Patrick Da Costa

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Chemistry 56 11841 10667 463 416 230 9273

Patrick Da Costa publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Patrick Da Costa between 2001 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Patrick Da Costa published across 26 years, from 2001 to 2026, averaging 10 papers a year. Output peaked at 26 publications in 2021. 16 of the 259 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2001 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 26. Peak 26 publications in 2021. 2001: 2 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 0 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 10 publications 2009: 10 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 10 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 18 publications 2014: 15 publications 2015: 18 publications 2016: 15 publications 2017: 18 publications 2018: 16 publications 2019: 13 publications 2020: 13 publications 2021: 26 publications 2022: 9 publications 2023: 7 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 15 publications 2026: 1 publication
2001 2026

259 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Patrick Da Costa: publications per year, 2001 to 2026
Year Publications
2001 2
2002 4
2003 3
2004 5
2005 1
2006 0
2007 6
2008 10
2009 10
2010 8
2011 10
2012 10
2013 18
2014 15
2015 18
2016 15
2017 18
2018 16
2019 13
2020 13
2021 26
2022 9
2023 7
2024 6
2025 15
2026 1
Total 259
Download as CSV

Patrick Da Costa publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Chemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Patrick Da Costa sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000 1,250
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 61–80 to 1,295+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,350. Most scientists, 1,350, have 161–180 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 221–240 publications, is where this scientist sits. 61–80 publications: 66 scientists 81–100 publications: 302 scientists 101–120 publications: 623 scientists 121–140 publications: 918 scientists 141–160 publications: 1,218 scientists 161–180 publications: 1,350 scientists 181–200 publications: 1,344 scientists 201–220 publications: 1,281 scientists 221–240 publications: 1,216 scientists 241–260 publications: 1,100 scientists 261–280 publications: 979 scientists 281–300 publications: 939 scientists 301–320 publications: 764 scientists 321–340 publications: 643 scientists 341–360 publications: 628 scientists 361–380 publications: 522 scientists 381–400 publications: 459 scientists 401–420 publications: 397 scientists 421–440 publications: 327 scientists 441–460 publications: 270 scientists 461–480 publications: 265 scientists 481–500 publications: 252 scientists 501–520 publications: 201 scientists 521–540 publications: 185 scientists 541–560 publications: 148 scientists 561–580 publications: 148 scientists 581–600 publications: 132 scientists 601–620 publications: 114 scientists 621–640 publications: 104 scientists 641–660 publications: 91 scientists 661–680 publications: 92 scientists 681–700 publications: 73 scientists 701–720 publications: 57 scientists 721–740 publications: 54 scientists 741–760 publications: 67 scientists 761–780 publications: 45 scientists 781–800 publications: 46 scientists 801–820 publications: 39 scientists 821–840 publications: 32 scientists 841–860 publications: 36 scientists 861–880 publications: 29 scientists 881–900 publications: 26 scientists 901–920 publications: 24 scientists 921–940 publications: 14 scientists 941–960 publications: 23 scientists 961–980 publications: 28 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 15 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 29 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 12 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 19 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 12 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 6 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 8 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 12 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 5 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 6 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 14 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 7 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 2 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 6 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 4 scientists 1,281–1,294 publications: 6 scientists 1,295+ publications: 100 scientists
61–80 publications 1,295+

This scientist: 230 publications — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
61–80 66
81–100 302
101–120 623
121–140 918
141–160 1,218
161–180 1,350
181–200 1,344
201–220 1,281
221–240 1,216 230
241–260 1,100
261–280 979
281–300 939
301–320 764
321–340 643
341–360 628
361–380 522
381–400 459
401–420 397
421–440 327
441–460 270
461–480 265
481–500 252
501–520 201
521–540 185
541–560 148
561–580 148
581–600 132
601–620 114
621–640 104
641–660 91
661–680 92
681–700 73
701–720 57
721–740 54
741–760 67
761–780 45
781–800 46
801–820 39
821–840 32
841–860 36
861–880 29
881–900 26
901–920 24
921–940 14
941–960 23
961–980 28
981–1,000 15
1,001–1,020 29
1,021–1,040 12
1,041–1,060 19
1,061–1,080 12
1,081–1,100 6
1,101–1,120 8
1,121–1,140 12
1,141–1,160 5
1,161–1,180 6
1,181–1,200 14
1,201–1,220 7
1,221–1,240 2
1,241–1,260 6
1,261–1,280 4
1,281–1,294 6
1,295+ 100
Download as CSV

Patrick Da Costa D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Patrick Da Costa sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 159+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,051. Most scientists, 1,051, have 56–57 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 56–57 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 612 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 808 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 776 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 835 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 861 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 872 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 933 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,051 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 930 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 882 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 834 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 731 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 775 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 683 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 646 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 561 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 501 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 437 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 388 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 354 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 292 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 275 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 254 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 235 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 185 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 192 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 155 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 163 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 125 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 105 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 105 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 112 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 88 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 68 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 69 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 65 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 79 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 61 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 44 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 40 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 33 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 26 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 34 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 35 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 25 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 27 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 17 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 16 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 20 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 20 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 15 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 9 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 11 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 3 scientists 158 D-Index: 3 scientists 159+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 159+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 289
42–43 612
44–45 808
46–47 776
48–49 835
50–51 861
52–53 872
54–55 933
56–57 1,051 56
58–59 930
60–61 882
62–63 834
64–65 731
66–67 775
68–69 683
70–71 646
72–73 561
74–75 501
76–77 437
78–79 388
80–81 354
82–83 292
84–85 275
86–87 254
88–89 235
90–91 185
92–93 192
94–95 155
96–97 163
98–99 125
100–101 105
102–103 105
104–105 112
106–107 88
108–109 68
110–111 69
112–113 65
114–115 79
116–117 61
118–119 44
120–121 37
122–123 40
124–125 33
126–127 26
128–129 34
130–131 35
132–133 25
134–135 27
136–137 17
138–139 16
140–141 20
142–143 20
144–145 15
146–147 9
148–149 9
150–151 16
152–153 11
154–155 9
156–157 3
158 3
159+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Patrick Da Costa is affiliated with Université Paris Cité in France. The primary fields of their research are Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, with a strong focus on catalysis and materials chemistry. Their scholarly output includes work in related subfields such as Catalysis, Materials Chemistry, Process Chemistry and Technology, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, and Mechanical Engineering.

Key topics addressed in their research involve catalytic processes in materials science, catalysts for methane reforming, carbon dioxide utilization in catalysis, catalysis and oxidation reactions, layered double hydroxides synthesis and applications, CO2 reduction techniques and catalysts, and ammonia synthesis and nitrogen reduction.

The scientist has published extensively in several venues, with the most frequent being:

  • International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
  • Catalysis Today
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Fuel
  • Journal of CO2 Utilization

Some of their recent papers include:

  • Ni/zeolite X derived from fly ash as catalysts for CO2 methanation, 2020, Fuel
  • Ni/CeO2 Nanoparticles Promoted by Yttrium Doping as Catalysts for CO2 Methanation, 2020, ACS Applied Nano Materials
  • On the effect of yttrium promotion on Ni-layered double hydroxides-derived catalysts for hydrogenation of CO2 to methane, 2020, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
  • One-Step Synthesis of Highly Active and Stable Ni-ZrOx for Dry Reforming of Methane, 2020, Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research
  • Effect of ceria promotion on the catalytic performance of Ni/SBA-16 catalysts for CO2 methanation, 2020, Catalysis Science & Technology

Frequently collaborating with Patrick Da Costa are Monika Motak, Katarzyna Świrk Da Costa, Changwei Hu, Bogdan Samojeden, and Paulina Summa.

Best Publications

  • Photocatalytic degradation of methyl green dye in aqueous solution over natural clay-supported ZnO–TiO2 catalysts

    Haithem Bel Hadjltaief;Mourad Ben Zina;Maria Elena Galvez;Maria Elena Galvez;Patrick Da Costa;Patrick Da Costa

  • La-promoted Ni-hydrotalcite-derived catalysts for dry reforming of methane at low temperatures

    Hongrui Liu;Dominik Wierzbicki;Radoslaw Debek;Radoslaw Debek;Monika Motak

  • Ni-containing Ce-promoted hydrotalcite derived materials as catalysts for methane reforming with carbon dioxide at low temperature – On the effect of basicity

    Radosław Dębek;Radosław Dębek;Monika Radlik;Monika Motak;Maria Elena Galvez

  • Spectroscopic and chemical characterization of active and inactive Cu species in NO decomposition catalysts based on Cu-ZSM5

    Patrick Da Costa;Björn Modén;George D. Meitzner;Deuk Ki Lee

  • Methane dry reforming over hydrotalcite-derived Ni–Mg–Al mixed oxides: the influence of Ni content on catalytic activity, selectivity and stability

    Radosław Dębek;Radosław Dębek;Monika Motak;Dorota Duraczyska;Franck Launay

  • Novel Ni-La-hydrotalcite derived catalysts for CO2 methanation

    Dominik Wierzbicki;Radosław Debek;Radosław Debek;Monika Motak;Teresa Grzybek

  • Photocatalytic decolorization of cationic and anionic dyes over ZnO nanoparticle immobilized on natural Tunisian clay

    Haithem Bel Hadjltaief;Sameh Ben Ameur;Patrick Da Costa;Mourad Ben Zina

  • The influence of nickel content on the performance of hydrotalcite-derived catalysts in CO2 methanation reaction

    Dominik Wierzbicki;Dominik Wierzbicki;Rafał Baran;Radosław Dębek;Monika Motak

  • Promotion effect of zirconia on Mg(Ni,Al)O mixed oxides derived from hydrotalcites in CO2 methane reforming

    Radosław Dębek;Radosław Dębek;Monika Motak;Maria Elena Galvez;Teresa Grzybek

  • Hybrid plasma-catalytic methanation of CO2 at low temperature over ceria zirconia supported Ni catalysts

    Magadalena Nizio;Abdulkader Albarazi;Simeon Cavadias;Jacques Amouroux

  • Low temperature dry methane reforming over Ce, Zr and CeZr promoted Ni–Mg–Al hydrotalcite-derived catalysts

    Radosław Dębek;Radosław Dębek;Radosław Dębek;Maria Elena Galvez;Maria Elena Galvez;Franck Launay;Franck Launay;Monika Motak

  • A Short Review on the Catalytic Activity of Hydrotalcite-Derived Materials for Dry Reforming of Methane

    Radosław Dębek;Monika Motak;Teresa Grzybek;Maria Elena Galvez

  • Examination of the influence of La promotion on Ni state in hydrotalcite-derived catalysts under CO2 methanation reaction conditions: Operando X-ray absorption and emission spectroscopy investigation

    Dominik Wierzbicki;Dominik Wierzbicki;Rafal Baran;Radosław Dębek;Monika Motak

  • Hydrogen and syngas production by methane dry reforming on SBA-15 supported nickel catalysts: On the effect of promotion by Ce0.75Zr0.25O2 mixed oxide

    Abdulkader Albarazi;Patricia Beaunier;Patrick Da Costa

  • Kinetics and Mechanism of Steady-State Catalytic NO Decomposition Reactions on Cu–ZSM5

    Björn Modén;Patrick Da Costa;Benjamin Fonfé;Deuk Ki Lee

  • DRIFT study of the interaction of NO and O2 with the surface of Ce0.62Zr0.38O2 as deNOx catalyst

    Małgorzata Adamowska;Małgorzata Adamowska;Małgorzata Adamowska;Andrzej Krztoń;Mieczysława Najbar;Patrick Da Costa

  • The First Single-Step Immobilization of a Calix-[4]-arene onto the Surface of Silica

    Alexander Katz;Patrick Da Costa;and Angus Chun Pong Lam;Justin M. Notestein

  • Fe-clay-plate as a heterogeneous catalyst in photo-Fenton oxidation of phenol as probe molecule for water treatment

    Haithem Bel Hadjltaief;Patrick Da Costa;Patricia Beaunier;María Elena Gálvez

  • Kinetics of catalyzed and non-catalyzed oxidation of soot from a diesel engine

    Pierre Darcy;Pierre Darcy;Patrick Da Costa;Henry Mellottée;Jean-Michel Trichard

  • TiO2/clay as a heterogeneous catalyst in photocatalytic/photochemical oxidation of anionic reactive blue 19

    Haithem Bel Hadjltaief;Maria Elena Galvez;Maria Elena Galvez;Mourad Ben Zina;Patrick Da Costa;Patrick Da Costa

  • Enhanced catalytic stability through non-conventional synthesis of Ni/SBA-15 for methane dry reforming at low temperatures

    María Elena Gálvez;Abdulkader Albarazi;Patrick Da Costa

Frequent Co-Authors

Maria Elena Galvez
Maria Elena Galvez Universidad de Zaragoza
Gérald Djéga-Mariadassou
Gérald Djéga-Mariadassou Sorbonne University
Changwei Hu
Changwei Hu Sichuan University
Yaoqiang Chen
Yaoqiang Chen Sichuan University
François Baudin
François Baudin Sorbonne University
Rafael Moliner
Rafael Moliner Spanish National Research Council
Enrique Iglesia
Enrique Iglesia University of California, Berkeley
Agustín Bueno-López
Agustín Bueno-López University of Alicante
Dolores Lozano-Castelló
Dolores Lozano-Castelló University of Alicante
Céline Chizallet
Céline Chizallet French Institute of Petroleum

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Chemistry in the USA opens the door to diverse career paths, many of which benefit from complementary online degrees. For instance, careers in forensic science often require a strong chemistry background paired with specialized skills. Exploring forensic career paths and salary can help students understand the potential job opportunities and earning potential in this exciting field.

For those interested in the legal aspects of science, degrees in criminal justice and paralegal studies offer valuable alternatives. Understanding the cost of criminal justice degree is essential for making informed decisions about online education investments.

Additionally, obtaining an online associate degree in criminal justice can provide an affordable and flexible way to enter related fields, supporting career advancement without interrupting work or study schedules.

Those exploring the legal service sector should also consider insights on paralegal salary to evaluate how different degree types impact career outcomes. Combining chemistry with these online degrees can create unique and rewarding career pathways.

Best Scientists Citing Patrick Da Costa

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles