World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
52
Citations
15965
World Ranking
4384
National Ranking
1631

Benito J. Mariñas publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Benito J. Mariñas sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 157 publications — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Benito J. Mariñas D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Benito J. Mariñas sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Science and technology for water purification in the coming decades

    Mark A. Shannon;Paul W. Bohn;Paul W. Bohn;Menachem Elimelech;Menachem Elimelech;John G. Georgiadis

  • Science and technology for water purification in the coming decades

    Unknown

  • Kinetics of Escherichia coli inactivation with ozone

    Nimrata K. Hunt;Benito J. Mariñas

  • Toxic Impact of Bromide and Iodide on Drinking Water Disinfected with Chlorine or Chloramines

    Yang Yang;Yukako Komaki;Susana Y. Kimura;Hong Ying Hu

  • Quantification of functional groups and modeling of their ionization behavior in the active layer of FT30 reverse osmosis membrane.

    Orlando Coronell;Benito Jose Marinas;Xijing Zhang;David G Cahill

  • Occurrence and Comparative Toxicity of Haloacetaldehyde Disinfection Byproducts in Drinking Water.

    Clara H. Jeong;Cristina Postigo;Susan D. Richardson;Jane Ellen Simmons

  • Development and Performance Characterization of a Polyimine Covalent Organic Framework Thin-Film Composite Nanofiltration Membrane

    Lauren Valentino;Michio Matsumoto;William R. Dichtel;Benito J. Marinas

  • Depth heterogeneity of fully aromatic polyamide active layers in reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes.

    Orlando Coronell;Benito Jose Marinas;David G Cahill

  • Inactivation of Escherichia coli with ozone: chemical and inactivation kinetics

    Nimrata K Hunt;Benito J Mariñas

  • Physico-chemical characterization of NF/RO membrane active layers by Rutherford backscattering spectrometry

    Baoxia Mi;Orlando Coronell;Benito J. Mariñas;Fumiya Watanabe

  • Absorption of water in the active layer of reverse osmosis membranes

    Xijing Zhang;David G. Cahill;Orlando Coronell;Benito J. Mariñas

  • Ionization behavior, stoichiometry of association, and accessibility of functional groups in the active layers of reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes.

    Orlando Coronell;Mari I. González;Benito J. Mariñas;David G. Cahill

  • Inactivation of Bacillus subtilis spores and formation of bromate during ozonation.

    Amy Driedger;Ernö Staub;Ulrich Pinkernell;Benito Mariñas

  • Inactivation of Bacillus subtilis spores with ozone and monochloramine

    Matthew A. Larson;Benito J. Mariñas

  • Synergy in sequential inactivation of Cryptosporidium parvum with ozone/free chlorine and ozone/monochloramine

    Jason L. Rennecker;Amy M. Driedger;Sara A. Rubin;Benito Jose Marinas

  • Inactivation of Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts with ozone and monochloramine at low temperature.

    Amy M Driedger;Jason L Rennecker;Benito J Mariñas

  • Effects of Powdered Activated Carbon Pore Size Distribution on the Competitive Adsorption of Aqueous Atrazine and Natural Organic Matter

    Li Ding;Vernon L. Snoeyink;Benito J. Mariñas;Zhongren Yue

  • Bromamine decomposition kinetics in aqueous solutions.

    Hongxia Lei;Benito Jose Marinas;Roger A. Minear

  • Inactivation of bacteriophage MS2 with potassium ferrate(VI)

    Lanhua Hu;Martin A. Page;Therese Sigstam;Tamar Kohn

  • Formation of Cyanogen Chloride from the Reaction of Monochloramine with Formaldehyde

    Erik J. Pedersen;Edward T. Urbansky;Benito J. Mariñas;Dale W. Margerum

Frequent Co-Authors

Dale W. Margerum
Dale W. Margerum Purdue University West Lafayette

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in advancing their career in environmental sciences, exploring related online degrees can provide valuable flexibility and options. Many professionals choose to expand their expertise through advanced programs like education doctoral programs without dissertation, allowing them to graduate faster while focusing on practical skills relevant to environmental education and policy.

Accreditation is key when selecting an online program. Programs such as accredited eds to edd programs ensure quality education and career recognition, especially for those aiming at leadership roles within environmental organizations or academic institutions.

For professionals blending social work with environmental advocacy, affordable options like dsw online programs offer the chance to impact community health and sustainable development.

Additionally, many start with more flexible or interdisciplinary degrees. Students seeking versatility often consider a budget friendly online general studies degree, which can serve as a foundation before specializing in environmental sciences or related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Benito J. Mariñas

Recently Published Articles