World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
77
Citations
57606
World Ranking
18226
National Ranking
9089

Barry F. Uretsky publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Barry F. Uretsky sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 523 publications — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Barry F. Uretsky D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Barry F. Uretsky sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 77 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Barry F. Uretsky is affiliated with the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on fields related to medicine, with significant contributions in surgery, cardiology and cardiovascular medicine, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, pulmonary and respiratory medicine, and internal medicine.

The scientist's work extensively covers topics such as coronary interventions and diagnostics, cardiac imaging and diagnostics, acute myocardial infarction research, peripheral artery disease management, antiplatelet therapy and cardiovascular diseases, venous thromboembolism diagnosis and management, and cardiac valve diseases and treatments.

Recent publications by Barry F. Uretsky include the following papers:

  • Prospective Evaluation of the Strategy of Functionally Optimized Coronary Intervention, 2020, Journal of the American Heart Association
  • Prognostic Implications of Fractional Flow Reserve After Coronary Stenting, 2022, JAMA Network Open
  • Impact of Post-PCI FFR Stratified by Coronary Artery, 2023, JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
  • Invasive Coronary Physiology After Stent Implantation, 2021, JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
  • Temporal Trends in Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: Insights From the PROGRESS-CTO Registry, 2020, The Journal of Invasive Cardiology

Barry F. Uretsky has frequently collaborated with several co-authors, including Emmanouil S. Brilakis, Khaldoon Alaswad, Bavana V. Rangan, Jaikirshan Khatri, and Farouc A. Jaffer.

The scientist often publishes in a number of specialized cardiovascular journals, with repeated appearances in:

  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
  • The American Journal of Cardiology
  • JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
  • The Journal of Invasive Cardiology

Best Publications

  • Myocardial infarction redefined--a consensus document of The Joint European Society of Cardiology/American College of Cardiology Committee for the redefinition of myocardial infarction.

    Elliott Antman;Jean-Pierre Bassand;Werner Klein;Magnus Ohman

  • Universal definition of myocardial infarction.

    Kristian Thygesen;Joseph S. Alpert;Harvey D. White;Allan S. Jaffe

  • A Comparison of Continuous Intravenous Epoprostenol (Prostacyclin) with Conventional Therapy for Primary Pulmonary Hypertension

    Robyn J. Barst;Lewis J. Rubin;Walker A. Long;Michael D. McGoon

  • Myocardial infarction redefined - A consensus document of the Joint European Society of Cardiology/American College of Cardiology committee for the redefinition of myocardial infarction

    J. S. Alpert;E. Antman;F. Apple;P. W. Armstrong

  • 2014 ACC/AHA guideline on perioperative cardiovascular evaluation and management of patients undergoing noncardiac surgery: A report of the American college of cardiology/American heart association task force on practice guidelines

    Lee Alan Fleisher;Kirsten E. Fleischmann;Andrew D. Auerbach;Susan A. Barnason

  • Comparative Effects of Low and High Doses of the Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor, Lisinopril, on Morbidity and Mortality in Chronic Heart Failure

    Milton Packer;Philip A. Poole-Wilson;Paul W. Armstrong;John G. F. Cleland

  • A randomized controlled trial of epoprostenol therapy for severe congestive heart failure: The Flolan International Randomized Survival Trial (FIRST)

    Robert M. Califf;Kirkwood F. Adams;William J. McKenna;Mihai Gheorghiade

  • Carvedilol Inhibits Clinical Progression in Patients With Mild Symptoms of Heart Failure

    Wilson S. Colucci;Milton Packer;Michael R. Bristow;E. Michael Gilbert

  • Ultrasound-assisted cannulation of the internal jugular vein. A prospective comparison to the external landmark-guided technique.

    B G Denys;B F Uretsky;P S Reddy

  • 2014 ACC/AHA Guideline on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation and Management of Patients Undergoing Noncardiac Surgery: Executive Summary

    Lee A. Fleisher;Kirsten E. Fleischmann;Andrew D. Auerbach;Susan A. Barnason

  • Randomized study assessing the effect of digoxin withdrawal in patients with mild to moderate chronic congestive heart failure: Results of the PROVED trial

    Barry F. Uretsky;James B. Young;F.Eden Shahidi;Larry G. Yellen

  • Continuous intravenous dobutamine is associated with an increased risk of death in patients with advanced heart failure: insights from the Flolan International Randomized Survival Trial (FIRST).

    Christopher M. O'Connor;Wendy A. Gattis;Barry F. Uretsky;Kirkwood F. Adams

  • Development of coronary artery disease in cardiac transplant patients receiving immunosuppressive therapy with cyclosporine and prednisone.

    B F Uretsky;S Murali;P S Reddy;B Rabin

  • Cardiac troponin T and C-reactive protein for predicting prognosis, coronary atherosclerosis, and cardiomyopathy in patients undergoing long-term hemodialysis.

    Christopher DeFilippi;Steven Wasserman;Salvatore Rosanio;Eric Tiblier

  • Anatomical Variations of Internal Jugular Vein Location: Impact on Central Venous Access

    B. G. Denys;B. F. Uretsky

  • Multicenter trial of oral enoximone in patients with moderate to moderately severe congestive heart failure. Lack of benefit compared with placebo. Enoximone Multicenter Trial Group.

    B F Uretsky;M Jessup;M A Konstam;G W Dec

  • Effects of long-term infusion of prostacyclin (epoprostenol) on echocardiographic measures of right ventricular structure and function in primary pulmonary hypertension

    A. L. Hinderliter;P. W. Willis;R. J. Barst;S. Rich

  • Acute coronary findings at autopsy in heart failure patients with sudden death: results from the assessment of treatment with lisinopril and survival (ATLAS) trial.

    Barry F. Uretsky;Kristian Thygesen;Paul W. Armstrong;John G. Cleland

  • Gender differences in survival in advanced heart failure. Insights from the FIRST study.

    Kirkwood F. Adams;Carla A. Sueta;Mihai Gheorghiade;Christopher M. O'Connor

  • Physiologic Abnormalities of Cardiac Function in Progressive Systemic Sclerosis with Diffuse Scleroderma

    William P. Follansbee;Edward I. Curtiss;Thomas A. Medsger;Virginia D. Steen

Frequent Co-Authors

Emmanouil S. Brilakis
Emmanouil S. Brilakis Abbott Northwestern Hospital
Ajay J. Kirtane
Ajay J. Kirtane Columbia University
David E. Kandzari
David E. Kandzari Piedmont Atlanta Hospital
Jeffrey W. Moses
Jeffrey W. Moses Columbia University Medical Center
Robert L. Kormos
Robert L. Kormos University of Pittsburgh
Robert L. Hardesty
Robert L. Hardesty University of Pittsburgh
Mihai Gheorghiade
Mihai Gheorghiade Northwestern University
Marschall S. Runge
Marschall S. Runge University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Kirkwood F. Adams
Kirkwood F. Adams University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Joseph G. Verbalis
Joseph G. Verbalis Georgetown University Medical Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in healthcare opens up diverse and flexible career pathways. For those starting out, pursuing the cheapest online nursing program can be an affordable gateway into the medical field, providing a solid foundation for both clinical and non-clinical roles.

Registered Nurses looking to upgrade their qualifications may consider the most affordable accredited online rn to bsn programs. These programs are designed to boost career prospects and meet the increasing demand for BSN-prepared nurses.

For those aiming for leadership or academic positions, affordable doctoral options are available through the cheapest phd nursing programs. These programs can lead to roles in research, education, and advanced practice.

Individuals from non-nursing backgrounds aren’t left out. The online direct entry msn programs for non-nurses offer a fast-track route to earning a master’s in nursing, opening doors to advanced practice or specialized fields.

Choosing the right online pathway depends on your background, career goals, and budget. With a range of accredited and flexible options available, advancing your healthcare career has never been more accessible.

Best Scientists Citing Barry F. Uretsky

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles