World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 38 10064 9779 4245 4070 123 8143

Apostol Natsev publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Apostol Natsev between 1999 and 2019, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Apostol Natsev published across 21 years, from 1999 to 2019, averaging 5.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 18 publications in 2007. 5 of the 124 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1999 to 2019. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 18. Peak 18 publications in 2007. 1999: 2 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 16 publications 2004: 9 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 18 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 12 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 2 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 0 publications 2018: 2 publications 2019: 3 publications
1999 2019

124 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Apostol Natsev: publications per year, 1999 to 2019
Year Publications
1999 2
2000 0
2001 7
2002 5
2003 16
2004 9
2005 6
2006 6
2007 18
2008 8
2009 6
2010 12
2011 6
2012 8
2013 3
2014 2
2015 3
2016 2
2017 0
2018 2
2019 3
Total 124
Download as CSV

Apostol Natsev publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Apostol Natsev sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 122–131 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 123 publications — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544 123
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Apostol Natsev D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Apostol Natsev sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 38–39 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968 38
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2008 - ACM Senior Member

Overview

Apostol Natsev is affiliated with Google in the United States and has contributed to research primarily in the domains of computer science, social sciences, and physics and astronomy. Their work spans several interdisciplinary fields, reflecting a broad interest in both technical and social aspects of information processing and analysis.

Natsev's main fields of study comprise:

  • Computer Science
  • Social Sciences
  • Physics and Astronomy

Within these broader areas, Natsev's research subfields include:

  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

They focus mainly on topics such as video analysis and summarization, misinformation and its impacts, and complex network analysis techniques.

  • Video Analysis and Summarization
  • Misinformation and Its Impacts
  • Complex Network Analysis Techniques

Apostol Natsev has coauthored work with several researchers including Lexing Xie, John R. Kender, M. E. Hill, and John Smith.

  • Lexing Xie
  • John R. Kender
  • M. E. Hill
  • John Smith

One of the recent publications by Natsev is titled "Tracking Visual Memes in Rich-Media Social Communities," published in 2021 in the Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media. This paper addresses the tracking of visual content across social media platforms and has received citations within the community.

Natsev's contributions appear in the Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media as a publication venue.

  • Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media

In recognition of professional accomplishments, Natsev was awarded the ACM Senior Member status in 2008.

Best Publications

  • YouTube-8M: A Large-Scale Video Classification Benchmark

    Sami Abu-El-Haija;Nisarg Kothari;Joonseok Lee;Apostol (Paul) Natsev

  • Social media use by government: From the routine to the critical

    Andrea L. Kavanaugh;Edward A. Fox;Steven D. Sheetz;Seungwon Yang

  • WALRUS: a similarity retrieval algorithm for image databases

    Apostol Natsev;Rajeev Rastogi;Kyuseok Shim

  • IBM Research TRECVID-2003 Video Retrieval System.

    Arnon Amir;Marco Berg;Shih-Fu Chang;Winston H. Hsu

  • IBM Research TRECVID-2005 Video Retrieval System

    Arnon Amir;Janne Argillander;Murray Campbell;Alexander Haubold

  • Supporting Incremental Join Queries on Ranked Inputs

    Apostol Natsev;Yuan-Chi Chang;John R. Smith;Chung-Sheng Li

  • Semantic concept-based query expansion and re-ranking for multimedia retrieval

    Apostol (Paul) Natsev;Alexander Haubold;Jelena Tešić;Lexing Xie

  • Proceedings of the 22nd ACM international conference on Multimedia

    Kien A. Hua;Yong Rui;Ralf Steinmetz;Alan Hanjalic

  • Multimedia semantic indexing using model vectors

    J.R. Smith;M. Naphade;A. Natsev

  • WALRUS: a similarity retrieval algorithm for image databases

    A. Natsev;Rajeev Rastogi;K. Shim

  • Semantic Model Vectors for Complex Video Event Recognition

    M. Merler;B. Huang;Lexing Xie;Gang Hua

  • Learning the semantics of multimedia queries and concepts from a small number of examples

    Apostol (Paul) Natsev;Milind R. Naphade;Jelena TešiĆ

  • IBM Research TRECVID-2006 Video Retrieval System

    Murray Campbell;Alexander Haubold;Shahram Ebadollahi;Dhiraj Joshi

  • IBM Research TRECVID-2007 Video Retrieval System

    Murray Campbell;Alexander Haubold;Ming Liu;Apostol Natsev

  • A web-based system for collaborative annotation of large image and video collections: an evaluation and user study

    Timo Volkmer;John R. Smith;Apostol (Paul) Natsev

  • Method and apparatus for content representation and retrieval in concept model space

    John R. Smith;Milind Naphade;Apostol Natsev

  • Temporal segment based extraction and robust matching of video fingerprints

    Jane Wen Chang;Apostol Ivanov Natsev;John R. Smith

  • Visual memes in social media: tracking real-world news in YouTube videos

    Lexing Xie;Apostol Natsev;John R. Kender;Matthew Hill

  • Multi-modal fusion in content-based retrieval

    Ching-Yung Lin;Apostol Natsev;Milind R. Naphade;John R. Smith

  • Methods of imaging based on wavelet retrieval of scenes

    Apostol Ivanov Natsev;Rajeev Rastogi;Kyuseok Shim

  • IBM Research TRECVID 2004 Video Retrieval System.

    Arnon Amir;Janne Argillander;Marco Berg;Shih-Fu Chang

Frequent Co-Authors

John R. Smith
John R. Smith IBM (United States)
Milind R. Naphade
Milind R. Naphade Nvidia (United States)
Lexing Xie
Lexing Xie Australian National University
Rong Yan
Rong Yan Snapchat
Ching-Yung Lin
Ching-Yung Lin National Chi Nan University
Belle L. Tseng
Belle L. Tseng Apple (United States)
Gang Hua
Gang Hua Dolby (United States)
Shih-Fu Chang
Shih-Fu Chang Columbia University
George Toderici
George Toderici Google (United States)
Chung-Sheng Li
Chung-Sheng Li PricewaterhouseCoopers (United Kingdom)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degree options broadens your career prospects in the dynamic field of Computer Science. Many students are now seeking flexible pathways that align with their career goals and lifestyle needs.

If you’re eager to enter the workforce quickly, consider enrolling in one of the fastest online degree programs. These accelerated options can help you develop valuable skills and start earning sooner.

For those interested in emerging tech, pursuing the best online master's in artificial intelligence can unlock opportunities in high-demand sectors such as automation, data science, and robotics.

Choosing the right program is crucial. It’s worthwhile to review the best college degrees to ensure your studies match current market trends and your personal interests.

If accessibility and flexibility are priorities, you may also explore the easiest masters programs to get into. These options can offer a smoother entry into graduate studies for those balancing work, family, or other commitments.

Best Scientists Citing Apostol Natsev

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles