World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
38
Citations
8143
World Ranking
10064
National Ranking
4245

Apostol Natsev publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Apostol Natsev sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 123 publications — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Apostol Natsev D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Apostol Natsev sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2008 - ACM Senior Member

Overview

Apostol Natsev is affiliated with Google in the United States and has contributed to research primarily in the domains of computer science, social sciences, and physics and astronomy. Their work spans several interdisciplinary fields, reflecting a broad interest in both technical and social aspects of information processing and analysis.

Natsev's main fields of study comprise:

  • Computer Science
  • Social Sciences
  • Physics and Astronomy

Within these broader areas, Natsev's research subfields include:

  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

They focus mainly on topics such as video analysis and summarization, misinformation and its impacts, and complex network analysis techniques.

  • Video Analysis and Summarization
  • Misinformation and Its Impacts
  • Complex Network Analysis Techniques

Apostol Natsev has coauthored work with several researchers including Lexing Xie, John R. Kender, M. E. Hill, and John Smith.

  • Lexing Xie
  • John R. Kender
  • M. E. Hill
  • John Smith

One of the recent publications by Natsev is titled "Tracking Visual Memes in Rich-Media Social Communities," published in 2021 in the Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media. This paper addresses the tracking of visual content across social media platforms and has received citations within the community.

Natsev's contributions appear in the Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media as a publication venue.

  • Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media

In recognition of professional accomplishments, Natsev was awarded the ACM Senior Member status in 2008.

Best Publications

  • YouTube-8M: A Large-Scale Video Classification Benchmark

    Sami Abu-El-Haija;Nisarg Kothari;Joonseok Lee;Apostol (Paul) Natsev

  • Social media use by government: From the routine to the critical

    Andrea L. Kavanaugh;Edward A. Fox;Steven D. Sheetz;Seungwon Yang

  • WALRUS: a similarity retrieval algorithm for image databases

    Apostol Natsev;Rajeev Rastogi;Kyuseok Shim

  • IBM Research TRECVID-2003 Video Retrieval System.

    Arnon Amir;Marco Berg;Shih-Fu Chang;Winston H. Hsu

  • IBM Research TRECVID-2005 Video Retrieval System

    Arnon Amir;Janne Argillander;Murray Campbell;Alexander Haubold

  • Supporting Incremental Join Queries on Ranked Inputs

    Apostol Natsev;Yuan-Chi Chang;John R. Smith;Chung-Sheng Li

  • Semantic concept-based query expansion and re-ranking for multimedia retrieval

    Apostol (Paul) Natsev;Alexander Haubold;Jelena Tešić;Lexing Xie

  • Proceedings of the 22nd ACM international conference on Multimedia

    Kien A. Hua;Yong Rui;Ralf Steinmetz;Alan Hanjalic

  • Multimedia semantic indexing using model vectors

    J.R. Smith;M. Naphade;A. Natsev

  • WALRUS: a similarity retrieval algorithm for image databases

    A. Natsev;Rajeev Rastogi;K. Shim

  • Semantic Model Vectors for Complex Video Event Recognition

    M. Merler;B. Huang;Lexing Xie;Gang Hua

  • Learning the semantics of multimedia queries and concepts from a small number of examples

    Apostol (Paul) Natsev;Milind R. Naphade;Jelena TešiĆ

  • IBM Research TRECVID-2006 Video Retrieval System

    Murray Campbell;Alexander Haubold;Shahram Ebadollahi;Dhiraj Joshi

  • IBM Research TRECVID-2007 Video Retrieval System

    Murray Campbell;Alexander Haubold;Ming Liu;Apostol Natsev

  • A web-based system for collaborative annotation of large image and video collections: an evaluation and user study

    Timo Volkmer;John R. Smith;Apostol (Paul) Natsev

  • Method and apparatus for content representation and retrieval in concept model space

    John R. Smith;Milind Naphade;Apostol Natsev

  • Temporal segment based extraction and robust matching of video fingerprints

    Jane Wen Chang;Apostol Ivanov Natsev;John R. Smith

  • Visual memes in social media: tracking real-world news in YouTube videos

    Lexing Xie;Apostol Natsev;John R. Kender;Matthew Hill

  • Multi-modal fusion in content-based retrieval

    Ching-Yung Lin;Apostol Natsev;Milind R. Naphade;John R. Smith

  • Methods of imaging based on wavelet retrieval of scenes

    Apostol Ivanov Natsev;Rajeev Rastogi;Kyuseok Shim

  • IBM Research TRECVID 2004 Video Retrieval System.

    Arnon Amir;Janne Argillander;Marco Berg;Shih-Fu Chang

Frequent Co-Authors

John R. Smith
John R. Smith IBM (United States)
Milind R. Naphade
Milind R. Naphade Nvidia (United States)
Lexing Xie
Lexing Xie Australian National University
Rong Yan
Rong Yan Snapchat
Ching-Yung Lin
Ching-Yung Lin National Chi Nan University
Belle L. Tseng
Belle L. Tseng Apple (United States)
Gang Hua
Gang Hua Dolby (United States)
Shih-Fu Chang
Shih-Fu Chang Columbia University
George Toderici
George Toderici Google (United States)
Chung-Sheng Li
Chung-Sheng Li PricewaterhouseCoopers (United Kingdom)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degree options broadens your career prospects in the dynamic field of Computer Science. Many students are now seeking flexible pathways that align with their career goals and lifestyle needs.

If you’re eager to enter the workforce quickly, consider enrolling in one of the fastest online degree programs. These accelerated options can help you develop valuable skills and start earning sooner.

For those interested in emerging tech, pursuing the best online master's in artificial intelligence can unlock opportunities in high-demand sectors such as automation, data science, and robotics.

Choosing the right program is crucial. It’s worthwhile to review the best college degrees to ensure your studies match current market trends and your personal interests.

If accessibility and flexibility are priorities, you may also explore the easiest masters programs to get into. These options can offer a smoother entry into graduate studies for those balancing work, family, or other commitments.

Best Scientists Citing Apostol Natsev

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles