World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
37
Citations
8260
World Ranking
6767
National Ranking
2282

Anna T. Trugman publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anna T. Trugman sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 112 publications — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Anna T. Trugman D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anna T. Trugman sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Anna T. Trugman is affiliated with the University of California, Santa Barbara in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on Environmental Science, with an emphasis on Global and Planetary Change, Atmospheric Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology, and Plant Science. Their work covers a range of topics related to plant physiology, ecosystem dynamics, and climate interactions.

Trugman's research interests include:

  • Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
  • Tree-ring climate responses
  • Fire effects on ecosystems
  • Forest Management and Policy
  • Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Climate variability and models
  • Plant responses to elevated CO2

The scientist has contributed to multiple frequent publication venues, including:

  • New Phytologist
  • Global Change Biology
  • Earth's Future
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Among recent notable papers authored or co-authored by Trugman are:

  • "Why is Tree Drought Mortality so Hard to Predict?" (2021), published in Trends in Ecology & Evolution
  • "Climate-driven risks to the climate mitigation potential of forests" (2020), published in Science
  • "Integrating the evidence for a terrestrial carbon sink caused by increasing atmospheric CO2" (2020), published in New Phytologist
  • "Mechanisms of woody-plant mortality under rising drought, CO2 and vapour pressure deficit" (2022), published in Nature Reviews Earth & Environment
  • "Divergent forest sensitivity to repeated extreme droughts" (2020), published in Nature Climate Change

Frequent collaborators include several researchers with whom Trugman has co-authored extensively:

  • William R. L. Anderegg
  • Danny Cullenward
  • Leander D. L. Anderegg
  • Grayson Badgley
  • Jeremy Freeman

Best Publications

  • Climate-driven risks to the climate mitigation potential of forests

    William R.L. Anderegg;Anna T. Trugman;Grayson Badgley;Christa M. Anderson

  • Vegetation demographics in Earth System Models: A review of progress and priorities.

    Rosie A. Fisher;Charles D. Koven;William R. L. Anderegg;Bradley O. Christoffersen

  • Hydraulic diversity of forests regulates ecosystem resilience during drought

    William R. L. Anderegg;Alexandra G. Konings;Anna T. Trugman;Kailiang Yu

  • Integrating the evidence for a terrestrial carbon sink caused by increasing atmospheric CO2

    Anthony P. Walker;Martin G. De Kauwe;Ana Bastos;Soumaya Belmecheri

  • Allometric equations for integrating remote sensing imagery into forest monitoring programmes.

    Tommaso Jucker;John Caspersen;Jérôme Chave;Cécile Antin;Cécile Antin

  • Tree carbon allocation explains forest drought-kill and recovery patterns.

    A. T. Trugman;M. Detto;M. K. Bartlett;D. Medvigy

  • Divergent forest sensitivity to repeated extreme droughts

    William R. L. Anderegg;Anna T. Trugman;Anna T. Trugman;Grayson Badgley;Alexandra G. Konings

  • Widespread drought-induced tree mortality at dry range edges indicates that climate stress exceeds species' compensating mechanisms.

    William R. L. Anderegg;Leander D. L. Anderegg;Leander D. L. Anderegg;Kelly L. Kerr;Anna T. Trugman;Anna T. Trugman

  • Why is Tree Drought Mortality so Hard to Predict

    Anna T. Trugman;Leander D.L. Anderegg;Leander D.L. Anderegg;William R.L. Anderegg;Adrian J. Das

  • Systematic over-crediting in California's forest carbon offsets program.

    Grayson Badgley;Jeremy Freeman;Joseph J. Hamman;Barbara Haya

  • Soil Moisture Stress as a Major Driver of Carbon Cycle Uncertainty

    A. T. Trugman;D. Medvigy;J. S. Mankin;J. S. Mankin;W. R. L. Anderegg

  • Detecting forest response to droughts with global observations of vegetation water content.

    Alexandra G. Konings;Sassan S. Saatchi;Christian Frankenberg;Michael Keller;Michael Keller

  • Correlations between components of the water balance and burned area reveal new insights for predicting forest fire area in the southwest United States

    A. Park Williams;Richard Seager;Alison K. Macalady;Max Berkelhammer

  • The impact of rising CO2 and acclimation on the response of US forests to global warming.

    John S Sperry;Martin D Venturas;Henry N Todd;Anna T Trugman;Anna T Trugman

  • A theoretical and empirical assessment of stomatal optimization modeling

    Yujie Wang;John S. Sperry;William R. L. Anderegg;Martin D. Venturas

  • Plant functional traits and climate influence drought intensification and land-atmosphere feedbacks.

    William R L Anderegg;Anna T Trugman;David R Bowling;Guido Salvucci

  • Causes and Implications of Extreme Atmospheric Moisture Demand during the Record-Breaking 2011 Wildfire Season in the Southwestern United States*

    A. Park Williams;Richard Seager;Max Berkelhammer;Alison K. Macalady

  • Trait velocities reveal that mortality has driven widespread coordinated shifts in forest hydraulic trait composition.

    Anna T. Trugman;Leander D. L. Anderegg;Leander D. L. Anderegg;John D. Shaw;William R. L. Anderegg

  • Understanding and predicting forest mortality in the western United States using long-term forest inventory data and modeled hydraulic damage

    Martin D. Venturas;Henry N. Todd;Anna T. Trugman;William R. L. Anderegg

  • Pervasive decreases in living vegetation carbon turnover time across forest climate zones.

    Kailiang Yu;William K Smith;Anna T Trugman;Anna T Trugman;Richard Condit

Frequent Co-Authors

William R. L. Anderegg
William R. L. Anderegg University of Utah
David Medvigy
David Medvigy University of Notre Dame
Leander D. L. Anderegg
Leander D. L. Anderegg University of California, Santa Barbara
John S. Sperry
John S. Sperry University of Utah
Stephen W. Pacala
Stephen W. Pacala Princeton University
Nate G. McDowell
Nate G. McDowell Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
David R. Bowling
David R. Bowling University of Utah
Justin S. Mankin
Justin S. Mankin Dartmouth College
William K. Smith
William K. Smith Wake Forest University
Ying Fan
Ying Fan Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in Ecology and Evolution offers multidisciplinary opportunities, and many students explore online degrees to expand their skillsets or change fields. For those with an associate’s degree in nursing, asn to np bridge programs provide a fast-track to becoming a nurse practitioner, building expertise in healthcare and biology.

Individuals from non-nursing backgrounds who wish to pivot into healthcare can consider direct entry msn programs for non nurses online. These programs accelerate entry into advanced nursing roles by leveraging skills from other scientific disciplines.

Choosing the right online university is crucial. When comparing options, the capella university vs wgu rn to bsn comparison highlights key differences in cost, accreditation, and flexibility.

For registered nurses looking to advance, online bsn to msn programs offer affordable and efficient academic pathways. Each of these options combines foundational science learning with targeted professional skills—important for evolving careers at the interface of ecology, health, and education.

Best Scientists Citing Anna T. Trugman

Trending Scientists