World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Political Science 33 881 797 466 400 102 8927

Andrew M. Guess publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Andrew M. Guess between 2015 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Andrew M. Guess published across 11 years, from 2015 to 2025, averaging 15.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 88 publications in 2020. 13 of the 173 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60 80
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2015 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 88. Peak 88 publications in 2020. 2015: 6 publications 2016: 1 publication 2017: 0 publications 2018: 13 publications 2019: 11 publications 2020: 88 publications 2021: 18 publications 2022: 14 publications 2023: 9 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 7 publications
2015 2025

173 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Andrew M. Guess: publications per year, 2015 to 2025
Year Publications
2015 6
2016 1
2017 0
2018 13
2019 11
2020 88
2021 18
2022 14
2023 9
2024 6
2025 7
Total 173
Download as CSV

Andrew M. Guess publication distribution in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Political Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew M. Guess sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
20 40 60 80
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 36–40 to 333+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 97. Most scientists, 97, have 333+ publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 101–105 publications, is where this scientist sits. 36–40 publications: 10 scientists 41–45 publications: 11 scientists 46–50 publications: 25 scientists 51–55 publications: 27 scientists 56–60 publications: 44 scientists 61–65 publications: 52 scientists 66–70 publications: 62 scientists 71–75 publications: 62 scientists 76–80 publications: 79 scientists 81–85 publications: 71 scientists 86–90 publications: 82 scientists 91–95 publications: 65 scientists 96–100 publications: 85 scientists 101–105 publications: 76 scientists 106–110 publications: 66 scientists 111–115 publications: 78 scientists 116–120 publications: 67 scientists 121–125 publications: 73 scientists 126–130 publications: 73 scientists 131–135 publications: 64 scientists 136–140 publications: 45 scientists 141–145 publications: 53 scientists 146–150 publications: 44 scientists 151–155 publications: 45 scientists 156–160 publications: 33 scientists 161–165 publications: 32 scientists 166–170 publications: 28 scientists 171–175 publications: 31 scientists 176–180 publications: 29 scientists 181–185 publications: 27 scientists 186–190 publications: 36 scientists 191–195 publications: 27 scientists 196–200 publications: 24 scientists 201–205 publications: 16 scientists 206–210 publications: 16 scientists 211–215 publications: 19 scientists 216–220 publications: 16 scientists 221–225 publications: 17 scientists 226–230 publications: 18 scientists 231–235 publications: 23 scientists 236–240 publications: 17 scientists 241–245 publications: 13 scientists 246–250 publications: 17 scientists 251–255 publications: 9 scientists 256–260 publications: 13 scientists 261–265 publications: 8 scientists 266–270 publications: 12 scientists 271–275 publications: 8 scientists 276–280 publications: 10 scientists 281–285 publications: 13 scientists 286–290 publications: 13 scientists 291–295 publications: 5 scientists 296–300 publications: 6 scientists 301–305 publications: 11 scientists 306–310 publications: 9 scientists 311–315 publications: 6 scientists 316–320 publications: 4 scientists 321–325 publications: 4 scientists 326–330 publications: 2 scientists 331–332 publications: 5 scientists 333+ publications: 97 scientists
36–40 publications 333+

This scientist: 102 publications — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Political Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 2,033 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
36–40 10
41–45 11
46–50 25
51–55 27
56–60 44
61–65 52
66–70 62
71–75 62
76–80 79
81–85 71
86–90 82
91–95 65
96–100 85
101–105 76 102
106–110 66
111–115 78
116–120 67
121–125 73
126–130 73
131–135 64
136–140 45
141–145 53
146–150 44
151–155 45
156–160 33
161–165 32
166–170 28
171–175 31
176–180 29
181–185 27
186–190 36
191–195 27
196–200 24
201–205 16
206–210 16
211–215 19
216–220 16
221–225 17
226–230 18
231–235 23
236–240 17
241–245 13
246–250 17
251–255 9
256–260 13
261–265 8
266–270 12
271–275 8
276–280 10
281–285 13
286–290 13
291–295 5
296–300 6
301–305 11
306–310 9
311–315 6
316–320 4
321–325 4
326–330 2
331–332 5
333+ 97
Download as CSV

Andrew M. Guess D-index placement in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Political Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew M. Guess sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 43 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 20 to 62+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 100. Most scientists, 100, have 62+ D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 33 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 20 D-Index: 76 scientists 21 D-Index: 79 scientists 22 D-Index: 84 scientists 23 D-Index: 68 scientists 24 D-Index: 88 scientists 25 D-Index: 82 scientists 26 D-Index: 76 scientists 27 D-Index: 75 scientists 28 D-Index: 99 scientists 29 D-Index: 96 scientists 30 D-Index: 96 scientists 31 D-Index: 81 scientists 32 D-Index: 86 scientists 33 D-Index: 81 scientists 34 D-Index: 84 scientists 35 D-Index: 72 scientists 36 D-Index: 58 scientists 37 D-Index: 53 scientists 38 D-Index: 48 scientists 39 D-Index: 40 scientists 40 D-Index: 40 scientists 41 D-Index: 32 scientists 42 D-Index: 26 scientists 43 D-Index: 25 scientists 44 D-Index: 33 scientists 45 D-Index: 33 scientists 46 D-Index: 17 scientists 47 D-Index: 21 scientists 48 D-Index: 22 scientists 49 D-Index: 18 scientists 50 D-Index: 19 scientists 51 D-Index: 19 scientists 52 D-Index: 15 scientists 53 D-Index: 14 scientists 54 D-Index: 10 scientists 55 D-Index: 13 scientists 56 D-Index: 9 scientists 57 D-Index: 11 scientists 58 D-Index: 12 scientists 59 D-Index: 10 scientists 60 D-Index: 5 scientists 61 D-Index: 7 scientists 62+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 62+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Political Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 2,033 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
20 76
21 79
22 84
23 68
24 88
25 82
26 76
27 75
28 99
29 96
30 96
31 81
32 86
33 81 33
34 84
35 72
36 58
37 53
38 48
39 40
40 40
41 32
42 26
43 25
44 33
45 33
46 17
47 21
48 22
49 18
50 19
51 19
52 15
53 14
54 10
55 13
56 9
57 11
58 12
59 10
60 5
61 7
62+ 100
Download as CSV

Best Publications

  • Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook

    Andrew Guess;Jonathan Nagler;Joshua Tucker

  • Social media, political polarization, and political disinformation: a review of the scientific literature

    Joshua A. Tucker;Andrew Guess;Pablo Barbera;Cristian Vaccari;Cristian Vaccari

  • A digital media literacy intervention increases discernment between mainstream and false news in the United States and India.

    Andrew M Guess;Michael Lerner;Benjamin Lyons;Jacob M Montgomery

  • Exposure to untrustworthy websites in the 2016 US election.

    Andrew M. Guess;Brendan Nyhan;Jason Reifler

  • Selective exposure to misinformation: Evidence from the consumption of fake news during the 2016 U.S. presidential campaign

    Andrew Guess;Brendan Nyhan;Jason Reifler

  • Asymmetric ideological segregation in exposure to political news on Facebook

    Unknown

  • How do social media feed algorithms affect attitudes and behavior in an election campaign?

    Unknown

  • How Many People Live in Political Bubbles on Social Media? Evidence From Linked Survey and Twitter Data:

    Gregory Eady;Jonathan Nagler;Andy Guess;Jan Zilinsky

  • Like-minded sources on Facebook are prevalent but not polarizing

    Unknown

  • Social Media and Democracy

    Unknown

  • Does Counter-Attitudinal Information Cause Backlash? Results from Three Large Survey Experiments

    Andrew Guess;Alexander Coppock

  • (Almost) Everything in Moderation: New Evidence on Americans' Online Media Diets

    Andrew M. Guess

  • Reshares on social media amplify political news but do not detectably affect beliefs or opinions

    Unknown

  • News credibility labels have limited average effects on news diet quality and fail to reduce misperceptions

    Unknown

  • Misinformation, Disinformation, and Online Propaganda

    Andrew M. Guess;Benjamin A. Lyons

  • The Distorting Prism of Social Media: How Self-Selection and Exposure to Incivility Fuel Online Comment Toxicity

    Jin Woo Kim;Andrew Guess;Brendan Nyhan;Jason Reifler

  • The consequences of online partisan media.

    Andrew M Guess;Pablo Barberá;Simon Munzert;JungHwan Yang

  • The Effects of Unsubstantiated Claims of Voter Fraud on Confidence in Elections

    Nicolas Berlinski;Margaret Doyle;Andrew M. Guess;Gabrielle Levy

  • Measure for Measure: An Experimental Test of Online Political Media Exposure

    Andrew M. Guess

  • Overconfidence in news judgments is associated with false news susceptibility.

    Benjamin A. Lyons;Jacob M. Montgomery;Andrew M. Guess;Brendan Nyhan

Frequent Co-Authors

Brendan Nyhan
Brendan Nyhan Dartmouth College
Jason Reifler
Jason Reifler University of Southampton
Joshua A. Tucker
Joshua A. Tucker New York University
Jonathan Nagler
Jonathan Nagler New York University
Kevin Munger
Kevin Munger European University Institute
Cristian Vaccari
Cristian Vaccari University of Edinburgh
Simon Munzert
Simon Munzert Hertie School
Richard Bonneau
Richard Bonneau New York University
Eszter Hargittai
Eszter Hargittai University of Zurich
Pamela E. Davis-Kean
Pamela E. Davis-Kean University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Andrew M. Guess

Recently Published Articles