World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Andrew J.G. Simpson

Andrew J.G. Simpson

D-Index & Metrics

Genetics

D-Index
67
Citations
11815
World Ranking
2552
National Ranking
39

Andrew J.G. Simpson publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew J.G. Simpson sits on this spectrum.

45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45 publications 703+

This scientist: 153 publications — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

Andrew J.G. Simpson D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew J.G. Simpson sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 67 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

Overview

Andrew J.G. Simpson is affiliated with Ludwig Cancer Research in Belgium and has contributed to multiple fields including Engineering and Agricultural and Biological Sciences. Their research spans various subfields such as Ocean Engineering, Plant Science, Mechanical Engineering, and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics.

Their work covers a range of topics with a focus on Oil and Gas Production Techniques, Non-Destructive Testing Techniques, Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods, as well as Botany and Plant Ecology Studies and Bryophyte Studies and Records. The overlapping interests in engineering and biological sciences reflect a multidisciplinary approach to research.

Andrew J.G. Simpson's publication record includes papers in notable venues such as the Journal of Civil Engineering and Architecture and Abstracts with programs - Geological Society of America. Their recent papers include:

  • Modern Corrosion Mapping of Storage Tank Bottoms-Notable Advancements in Critical Zone Coverage, Inspection Efficiency and Data Integrity, 2024, Journal of Civil Engineering and Architecture
  • A BIOGEOGRAPHIC HISTORY OF THE ROSACEAE (ANTHOPHYTA: EUDICOTYLEDONAE) USING FOSSIL-INFORMED PHYLOGEOGRAPHIC METHODS, 2022, Abstracts with programs - Geological Society of America

Their collaborative work involves frequent coauthors such as Matthew A. Boat, Scott L. Wing, and Charles B. Fenster. These collaborations indicate an active involvement in joint research efforts.

Publication venues where Simpson has appeared include:

  • Journal of Civil Engineering and Architecture
  • Abstracts with programs - Geological Society of America

Their primary fields of study highlight an engagement with both Engineering and Agricultural and Biological Sciences, marked by related subfields such as Ocean Engineering and Plant Science. This demonstrates a blend of applied and theoretical research interests.

Best Publications

  • The genome sequence of the plant pathogen Xylella fastidiosa

    A. J.G. Simpson;F. C. Reinach;P. Arruda;F. A. Abreu

  • Human IgE, IgG4 and resistance to reinfection with Schistosoma haematobium

    P. Hagan;U. J. Blumenthal;D. Dunn;A. J. G. Simpson

  • Multilocus Sequence Typing and Evolutionary Relationships among the Causative Agents of Melioidosis and Glanders, Burkholderia pseudomallei and Burkholderia mallei

    Daniel Godoy;Gaynor Randle;Andrew J. Simpson;David M. Aanensen

  • Comparative Genomics of Two Leptospira interrogans Serovars Reveals Novel Insights into Physiology and Pathogenesis

    A. L. T. O. Nascimento;A. I. Ko;A. I. Ko;E. A. L. Martins;C. B. Monteiro-Vitorello

  • CTdatabase: a knowledge-base of high-throughput and curated data on cancer-testis antigens

    Luiz Gonzaga Almeida;Noboru J. Sakabe;Alice R. deOliveira;Maria Cristina C. Silva

  • Integrative Annotation of 21,037 Human Genes Validated by Full-Length cDNA Clones

    Tadashi Imanishi;Takeshi Itoh;Yutaka Suzuki;Claire O'Donovan

  • Comparative analyses of the complete genome sequences of Pierce's disease and citrus variegated chlorosis strains of Xylella fastidiosa

    M. A. Van Sluys;M. C. De Oliveira;C. B. Monteiro-Vitorello;C. Y. Miyaki

  • Swine and Poultry Pathogens: the Complete Genome Sequences of Two Strains of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae and a Strain of Mycoplasma synoviae

    Ana Tereza R. Vasconcelos;Henrique B. Ferreira;Cristiano V. Bizarro;Sandro L. Bonatto

  • Shotgun sequencing of the human transcriptome with ORF expressed sequence tags

    Emmanuel Dias Neto;Ricardo Garcia Correa;Sergio Verjovski-Almeida;Marcelo R.S. Briones

  • High-throughput SELEX SAGE method for quantitative modeling of transcription-factor binding sites.

    Emmanuelle Roulet;Stéphane Busso;Anamaria A. Camargo;Andrew J.G. Simpson

  • Comparative genomic analysis of plant-associated bacteria.

    M. A. Van Sluys;C. B. Monteiro-Vitorello;L. E. A. Camargo;C. F. M. Menck

  • Frequent and specific immunity to the embryonal stem cell–associated antigen SOX2 in patients with monoclonal gammopathy

    Radek Spisek;Anjli Kukreja;Lin-Chi Chen;Phillip Matthews

  • Transferable anticancer innate immunity in spontaneous regression/complete resistance mice

    Amy M. Hicks;Gregory Riedlinger;Mark C. Willingham;Martha A. Alexander-Miller

  • PIK3CA Gene Mutations in Pediatric and Adult Glioblastoma Multiforme

    Gary L Gallia;Vikki Rand;I-Mei Siu;Charles G Eberhart

  • The genome of Schistosoma mansoni: isolation of DNA, its size, bases and repetitive sequences.

    Andrew J.G. Simpson;Alan Sher;Thomas F. McCutchan

  • Elevated Plasma Concentrations of Interferon (IFN)–γ and the IFN‐γ–Inducing Cytokines Interleukin (IL)–18, IL‐12, and IL‐15 in Severe Melioidosis

    F. N. Lauw;A. J. H. Simpson;A. J. H. Simpson;J. M. Prins;M. D. Smith;M. D. Smith

  • Melioidosis diagnostic workshop, 20131

    Alex R. Hoffmaster;David AuCoin;Prasith Baccam;Henry C. Baggett

  • An atlas of human gene expression from massively parallel signature sequencing (MPSS)

    C. Victor Jongeneel;Mauro Delorenzi;Christian Iseli;Daixing Zhou

  • The biology of schistosomes : from genes to latrines

    David Rollinson;Andrew J. G. Simpson

  • Sequence survey of receptor tyrosine kinases reveals mutations in glioblastomas

    Vikki Rand;Jiaqi Huang;Tim Stockwell;Steve Ferriera

Frequent Co-Authors

Lloyd J. Old
Lloyd J. Old Ludwig Cancer Research
C. Victor Jongeneel
C. Victor Jongeneel University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Brian Stevenson
Brian Stevenson University of Kentucky
Robert L. Strausberg
Robert L. Strausberg Ludwig Cancer Research
Yao-Tseng Chen
Yao-Tseng Chen Cornell University
Ricardo R. Brentani
Ricardo R. Brentani Ludwig Cancer Research
Wilson A. Silva
Wilson A. Silva Universidade de São Paulo
Sérgio D.J. Pena
Sérgio D.J. Pena Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
Philipp Bucher
Philipp Bucher École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Gustavo H. Goldman
Gustavo H. Goldman Universidade de São Paulo

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a future in Genetics can open the door to several related degrees and career paths. Many students interested in life sciences also look into specialized healthcare fields, like medical billing and coding schools that accept financial aid. These programs can be valuable for those seeking roles in healthcare administration or supporting the clinical process.

For learners wanting to accelerate their education, there are many accelerated degree programs in the U.S. These fast-track options help dedicated students earn their qualifications quickly and begin their careers sooner.

Flexible learning has also grown in popularity. Self paced degrees are ideal for those balancing work, family, or other commitments, letting students progress through coursework at a comfortable speed.

Finally, if you’re looking for affordability and ease of application, consider accredited online universities that do not require an application fee. This makes it simpler to start your journey into Genetics or a related field—without extra financial barriers.

Best Scientists Citing Andrew J.G. Simpson

Recently Published Articles