World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
36
Citations
5104
World Ranking
8732
National Ranking
55

Ana Estanqueiro publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ana Estanqueiro sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 151 publications — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Ana Estanqueiro D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ana Estanqueiro sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ana Estanqueiro is affiliated with the National Laboratory of Energy and Geology in Portugal. Their research focuses primarily on engineering, with a significant body of work in electrical and electronic engineering, control and systems engineering, energy engineering and power technology, aerospace engineering, and artificial intelligence.

They have contributed extensively to the fields of integrated energy systems optimization, smart grid energy management, electric power system optimization, microgrid control and optimization, hybrid renewable energy systems, energy load and power forecasting, and wind energy research and development.

Their recent publications include:

  • "System Impact Studies for Near 100% Renewable Energy Systems Dominated by Inverter Based Variable Generation", 2020, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems
  • "Addressing technical challenges in 100% variable inverter-based renewable energy power systems", 2020, Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Energy and Environment
  • "Decarbonization of Electricity Systems in Europe: Market Design Challenges", 2021, IEEE Power and Energy Magazine
  • "Model Predictive Control for Microgrid Functionalities: Review and Future Challenges", 2021, Energies
  • "C-E (curtailment - Energy share) map: An objective and quantitative measure to evaluate wind and solar curtailment", 2022, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews

Frequent co-authors in their research include António Couto, Hugo Algarvio, Damian Flynn, Hannele Holttinen, and Til Kristian Vrana.

Their work is often published in venues such as Energies, IET conference proceedings, Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Energy and Environment, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, and the Journal of Cleaner Production.

Best Publications

  • Wind and solar energy curtailment: A review of international experience

    Lori Bird;Debra Lew;Michael Milligan;E. Maria Carlini

  • Impacts of large amounts of wind power on design and operation of power systems, results of IEA collaboration

    Hannele Holttinen;Peter Meibom;Antje Orths;Bernhard Lange

  • Integrated sizing and scheduling of wind/PV/diesel/battery isolated systems

    André Malheiro;Pedro M. Castro;Ricardo M. Lima;Ana Estanqueiro

  • Design and operation of power systems with large amounts of wind power : Final report, IEA WIND Task 25, Phase one 2006-2008

    Hannele Holttinen;Peter Meibom;Antje Orths;Frans van Hulle

  • Design and operation of power systems with large amounts of wind power

    H. Holttinen;P. Meibom;A. Orths;F. V. Hulle

  • System impact studies for near 100% renewable energy systems dominated by inverter based variable generation

    Hannele Holttinen;Juha Kiviluoma;Damian Flynn;Charlie Smith

  • Design and operation of power systems with large amounts of wind power: State of the art report

    Hannele Holttinen;Bettina Lemstrom;Peter Meibom;Henrik Bindner

  • A new methodology for urban wind resource assessment

    Teresa Simões;Ana Estanqueiro

  • Addressing technical challenges in 100% variable inverter-based renewable energy power systems

    Bri Mathias S. Hodge;Bri Mathias S. Hodge;Himanshu Jain;Carlo Brancucci;Gab Su Seo

  • How to prepare a power system for 15% wind energy penetration: the Portuguese case study

    Ana Estanqueiro;Rui Castro;Pedro Flores;João Ricardo

  • C-E (curtailment – Energy share) map: An objective and quantitative measure to evaluate wind and solar curtailment

    Unknown

  • Technical impacts of high penetration levels of wind power on power system stability

    D. Flynn;Z. Rather;A. Ardal;S. D'Arco

  • State-of-the-art of design and operation of power systems with large amounts of wind power: Summary of IEA Wind collaboration

    H. Holttinen;P. Meibom;C. Ensslin;L. Hormann

  • The Levelized Cost of Energy (LCOE) of wave energy using GIS based analysis: The case study of Portugal

    Laura Castro-Santos;Geuffer Prado Garcia;Ana Estanqueiro;Paulo A.P.S. Justino

  • Design of a new urban wind turbine airfoil using a pressure-load inverse method

    J.C.C. Henriques;F. Marques da Silva;A.I. Estanqueiro;L.M.C. Gato

  • Design and Operation of Power Systems with Large Amounts of Wind Power, First Results of IEA Collaboration

    H. Holttinen;P. Meibom;A. Orths;F. Van Hulle

  • Decarbonization of Electricity Systems in Europe: Market Design Challenges

    Goran Strbac;Dimitrios Papadaskalopoulos;Nikolaos Chrysanthopoulos;Ana Estanqueiro

  • Model Predictive Control for Microgrid Functionalities: Review and Future Challenges

    Felix Garcia-Torres;Ascension Zafra-Cabeza;Carlos Silva;Stephane Grieu

  • Wind and solar curtailment

    Debra Lew;Lori Bird;Michael Milligan;Bethany Speer

  • Assessment of wind and solar PV local complementarity for the hybridization of the wind power plants installed in Portugal

    António Couto;Ana Estanqueiro

  • Experience and Challenges With Short-Term Balancing in European Systems With Large Share of Wind Power

    L. Soder;H. Abildgaard;A. Estanqueiro;C. Hamon

  • Review of wind generation within adequacy calculations and capacity markets for different power systems

    Lennart Söder;Egill Tómasson;Ana Estanqueiro;Damian Flynn

  • A Dynamic Wind Generation Model for Power Systems Studies

    A.I. Estanqueiro

  • How to prepare a power system for 12% wind energy penetration: The Portuguese Case Study

    Ana Estanqueiro;Rui Castro;João Ricardo;Medeiros Pinto

  • Operational costs induced by fluctuating wind power production in Germany and Scandinavia

    H. Holttinen;Peter Meibom;C. Ensslin;L. Hofmann

Frequent Co-Authors

Lennart Söder
Lennart Söder Royal Institute of Technology
Michael Milligan
Michael Milligan National Renewable Energy Laboratory
Damian Flynn
Damian Flynn University College Dublin
Mark O'Malley
Mark O'Malley Imperial College London
Goran Strbac
Goran Strbac Imperial College London
Rui Castro
Rui Castro Eindhoven University of Technology
Magnus Korpås
Magnus Korpås Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Bri-Mathias Hodge
Bri-Mathias Hodge University of Colorado Boulder

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Engineering and Technology in the USA opens doors not just to technical roles, but also to other evolving career pathways. Many students now look for flexible and affordable ways to expand their qualifications, and online degrees have emerged as a popular choice.

For those interested in management, exploring mba programs online no gmat can be beneficial, especially since these programs remove standardized test barriers. Additionally, cost remains a significant concern for international students and professionals—programs like an online mba under 25k help make advanced business education more accessible.

The digital landscape also offers new directions. Tech-savvy candidates might consider a social media marketing online degree, leveraging their technological skills into creative careers. Alternatively, those interested in service industries could pursue a hospitality management degree online for diverse roles in the global tourism sector.

These pathways show how foundational technology and engineering skills can lead to varied, in-demand careers—especially when paired with online learning flexibility.

Best Scientists Citing Ana Estanqueiro

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles