World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
32
Citations
5127
World Ranking
9510
National Ranking
4017

Alicja L. Markowska publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alicja L. Markowska sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 41 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Alicja L. Markowska D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alicja L. Markowska sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Alicja L. Markowska is affiliated with the National Institute on Aging in the United States. Their academic and research career is focused on scientific work associated with aging and related fields.

Available data does not list specific recent papers authored by Alicja L. Markowska. There is also no detailed information on frequent co-authors or publication venues connected to their research output.

Information about main fields of study, subfields, and main topics covered by their work is not provided in the current dataset.

There are no recorded book publications or awards linked to Alicja L. Markowska in the available information.

Though detailed specifics of the scientist's research focus are not listed here, their association with the National Institute on Aging suggests involvement in research related to aging biology, neuroscience, or gerontology, consistent with the institute's broad mission.

Best Publications

  • Episodic-like memory deficits in the APPswe/PS1dE9 mouse model of Alzheimer's disease: Relationships to β-amyloid deposition and neurotransmitter abnormalities

    Alena Savonenko;Guilian M. Xu;Tatiana Melnikova;Johanna L. Morton

  • Age-related spatial reference and working memory deficits assessed in the water maze

    Karyn M. Frick;Mark G. Baxter;Alicja L. Markowska;David S. Olton

  • Insulin-like growth factor-1 ameliorates age-related behavioral deficits

    A.L Markowska;M Mooney;W.E Sonntag

  • Sex Dimorphisms in the Rate of Age-Related Decline in Spatial Memory: Relevance to Alterations in the Estrous Cycle

    Alicja L. Markowska

  • Individual differences in aging: Behavioral and neurobiological correlates

    Alicja L. Markowska;William S. Stone;Donald K. Ingram;Jay Reynolds

  • Age-dependent cognitive deficits and neuronal apoptosis in cyclooxygenase-2 transgenic mice

    Katrin I. Andreasson;Alena Savonenko;Sveta Vidensky;Joseph J. Goellner

  • Effectiveness of Estrogen Replacement in Restoration of Cognitive Function after Long-Term Estrogen Withdrawal in Aging Rats

    Alicja L. Markowska;Alena V. Savonenko

  • Cholinergic manipulations in the medial septal area: age-related effects on working memory and hippocampal electrophysiology

    AL Markowska;DS Olton;B Givens

  • Human nerve growth factor improves spatial memory in aged but not in young rats

    Alicja L. Markowska;Vassilis E. Koliatsos;Steven J. Breckler;Donald L. Price

  • Basal forebrain lesions and memory: alterations in neurotensin, not acetylcholine, may cause amnesia.

    Gary L. Wenk;Alicja L. Markowska;David S. Olton

  • The cognitive effects of ovariectomy and estrogen replacement are modulated by aging

    A.V Savonenko;A.L Markowska

  • Variable-interval probe test as a tool for repeated measurements of spatial memory in the water maze.

    Alicja L. Markowska;Jeffrey M. Long;Christopher T. Johnson;David S. Olton

  • Acetyl-1-carnitine. 2: Effects on learning and memory performance of aged rats in simple and complex mazes.

    C.A. Barnes;A.L. Markowska;D.K. Ingram;H. Kametani

  • Behavioral Assessment of the Senescence-accelerated Mouse (SAM P8 and R1)

    Alicja L Markowska;Edward L Spangler;Donald K Ingram

  • Life-long diet restriction failed to retard cognitive aging in Fischer-344 rats.

    Alicja L Markowska

  • Nucleus basalis magnocellularis and memory: differential effects of two neurotoxins.

    Alicja L. Markowska;Gary L. Wenk;David S. Olton

  • Normal cognitive behavior in two distinct congenic lines of transgenic mice hyperexpressing mutant APPSWE

    Alena V Savonenko;Guilian M Xu;Donald L Price;David R Borchelt

  • 3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine, serotonin and memory.

    G A Ricaurte;A L Markowska;G L Wenk;G Hatzidimitriou

  • Acetyl-l-carnitine: Behavioral, electrophysiological, and neurochemical effects

    S. Davis;A.L. Markowska;G.L. Wenk;C.A. Barnes

  • Selective Effects of Nerve Growth Factor on Spatial Recent Memory as Assessed by a Delayed Nonmatching-to-Position Task in the Water Maze

    Alicja L. Markowska;Donald Price;Vassilis E. Koliatsos

  • An attempt to account for controversial estimates of working memory persistence in the radial maze.

    Alicja Markowska;O. Burešová;J. Bureš

Frequent Co-Authors

David S. Olton
David S. Olton Johns Hopkins University
Donald L. Price
Donald L. Price Johns Hopkins University
Alena Savonenko
Alena Savonenko Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Gary L. Wenk
Gary L. Wenk The Ohio State University
Donald K. Ingram
Donald K. Ingram Louisiana State University
Vassilis E. Koliatsos
Vassilis E. Koliatsos Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Karyn M. Frick
Karyn M. Frick University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee
Edward L. Spangler
Edward L. Spangler National Institutes of Health
George A. Ricaurte
George A. Ricaurte Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Carol A. Barnes
Carol A. Barnes University of Arizona

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Neuroscience unlocks diverse career opportunities across healthcare, research, technology, and education. If you’re considering alternative pathways or complementary credentials, exploring related online options can boost your skills and earning potential.

Numerous accredited programs now offer online degree programs that are flexible and accessible. Many students seek these degrees for their balance of academic rigor and convenience. If affordability is a top priority, look into online schools that accept fafsa to maximize your financial aid and minimize tuition costs.

For learners who want to quickly gain in-demand skills, there are easy licenses and certifications to get online that can lead to well-paying entry-level jobs. These certifications can complement a neuroscience background with specialized technical expertise.

Neuroscience graduates are also well-positioned for some of the nation’s most lucrative college majors and career tracks, whether within or beyond the traditional health sciences. Exploring online degrees and certifications can further expand your career pathways and earning potential.

Best Scientists Citing Alicja L. Markowska

Recently Published Articles