World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Alexander J. Wearing

Alexander J. Wearing

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
33
Citations
8969
World Ranking
10350
National Ranking
592

Alexander J. Wearing publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alexander J. Wearing sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 96 publications — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Alexander J. Wearing D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alexander J. Wearing sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Alexander J. Wearing was affiliated with the University of Melbourne in Australia. Their academic career was connected primarily to this institution.

There are no recent papers listed for Alexander J. Wearing, and no frequent co-authors have been identified within the available data.

Likewise, there are no recurring publication venues or book publishers recorded for their work. No specific fields of study, subfields, or main topics of research have been documented.

No awards or recognitions have been noted in the collected information.

Alexander J. Wearing is deceased.

Best Publications

  • Personality, life events, and subjective well-being: Toward a dynamic equilibrium model.

    Bruce Headey;Alexander Wearing

  • A Short Measure of Transformational Leadership

    Sally A. Carless;Alexander J. Wearing;Leon Mann

  • Leadership and trust: Their effect on knowledge sharing and team performance:

    Pauline Lee;Nicole Gillespie;Leon Mann;Alexander Wearing

  • Dimensions of mental health: Life satisfaction, positive affect, anxiety and depression.

    Bruce W. Headey;Jonathan Kelley;Alex J. Wearing

  • Top-Down Versus Bottom-Up Theories of Subjective Well-Being

    Bruce Headey;Ruut Veenhoven;Alex Wearing

  • Police stress and well-being: Integrating personality, coping and daily work experiences

    Peter M. Hart;Alexander J. Wearing;Bruce Headey

  • Residential Water Use: Predicting and Reducing Consumption1

    Campbell K. Aitken;Thomas A. Mcmahon;Alexander J. Wearing;Brian L. Finlayson

  • Need satisfaction and involvement in personal projects: Toward an integrative model of subjective well-being.

    Mary M. Omodei;Alexander J. Wearing

  • Adolescents' well-being and perceived control across 14 sociocultural contexts.

    Alexander Grob;Todd D Little;Brigitte Wanner;Alexander J Wearing

  • MODELS OF WELL-BEING AND ILL-BEING

    Bruce Headey;Elsie Holmstrom;Alexander Wearing

  • Mental health problems in rural contexts: What are the barriers to seeking help from professional providers?

    Henry J. Jackson;Fiona K. Judd;Angela Komiti;Caitlin Fraser

  • Development of the school organisational health questionnaire: a measure for assessing teacher morale and school organisational climate.

    Peter M. Hart;Alexander J. Wearing;Michael Conn;Nicholas L. Carter

  • Well-being and ill-being: Different dimensions?

    Bruce Headey;Elsie Holmström;Alexander Wearing

  • Subjective well-being: A stocks and flows framework.

    Bruce Headey;Alexander Wearing

  • Shared subjective views, intent to cooperate and tax compliance: Similarities between Australian taxpayers and tax officers

    Erich Kirchler;Apolonia Niemirowski;Alexander Wearing

  • The sense of relative superiority — Central to well-being

    Bruce Headey;Alex Wearing

  • Assessing police work experiences: Development of the police daily hassles and uplifts scales

    Peter M. Hart;Alexander J. Wearing;Bruce Headey

  • The impact of life events and changes in domain satisfactions on well-being

    Bruce Headey;Elsie Holmström;Alexander Wearing

  • The Fire Chief microworld generating program: An illustration of computer-simulated microworlds as an experimental paradigm for studying complex decision-making behavior

    Mary M. Omodei;Alexander J. Wearing

  • Decision Making Effectiveness in Wildfire Incident Management Teams

    Jim McLennan;Alina M. Holgate;Mary M. Omodei;Alexander J. Wearing

Frequent Co-Authors

Bruce Headey
Bruce Headey University of Melbourne
Leon Mann
Leon Mann University of Melbourne
Andrew Mackinnon
Andrew Mackinnon University of New South Wales
Philippa Pattison
Philippa Pattison University of Sydney
Garry Robins
Garry Robins University of Melbourne
Henry J. Jackson
Henry J. Jackson University of Melbourne
Greg Murray
Greg Murray Swinburne University of Technology
Einar B. Thorsteinsson
Einar B. Thorsteinsson University of New England
Todd D. Little
Todd D. Little Texas Tech University
Florian G. Kaiser
Florian G. Kaiser Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology programs opens up a range of flexible and affordable options for students across the USA. Whether you are interested in entering the workforce quickly or want to minimize tuition costs, several universities offer unique pathways tailored to your goals.

For those aiming to finish their studies at an accelerated pace, the fastest online psychology degrees in Washington provide streamlined coursework and supportive resources. Similarly, the fastest online psychology programs in Wisconsin allow students to achieve their academic ambitions on a timeline that suits their needs.

Cost is also an important consideration. Some institutions are known for being budget-friendly, making higher education more accessible. The cheapest online psychology bachelor's in Colorado and the Florida cheapest online psychology bachelor's degree are excellent examples of quality education at an affordable price.

With these options, students can match their educational journey to their personal, professional, and financial needs—building a strong foundation for diverse career pathways in psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Alexander J. Wearing

Recently Published Articles