World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Albrecht E. Sippel

Albrecht E. Sippel

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Genetics 49 4005 3780 267 253 88 7360

Albrecht E. Sippel publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Albrecht E. Sippel between 1970 and 2022, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Albrecht E. Sippel published across 53 years, from 1970 to 2022, averaging 1.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 7 publications in 1982. 1 of the 102 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1970 to 2022. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 7. Peak 7 publications in 1982. 1970: 1 publication 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 1 publication 1974: 1 publication 1975: 2 publications 1976: 4 publications 1977: 6 publications 1978: 3 publications 1979: 4 publications 1980: 2 publications 1981: 4 publications 1982: 7 publications 1983: 1 publication 1984: 2 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 7 publications 1987: 6 publications 1988: 3 publications 1989: 3 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 2 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 6 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 6 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 1 publication 2003: 2 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 0 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 1 publication 2010: 0 publications 2011: 0 publications 2012: 0 publications 2013: 0 publications 2014: 0 publications 2015: 0 publications 2016: 1 publication 2017: 0 publications 2018: 0 publications 2019: 0 publications 2020: 0 publications 2021: 0 publications 2022: 1 publication
1970 2022

102 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Albrecht E. Sippel: publications per year, 1970 to 2022
Year Publications
1970 1
1971 0
1972 0
1973 1
1974 1
1975 2
1976 4
1977 6
1978 3
1979 4
1980 2
1981 4
1982 7
1983 1
1984 2
1985 1
1986 7
1987 6
1988 3
1989 3
1990 1
1991 2
1992 2
1993 2
1994 6
1995 3
1996 3
1997 2
1998 2
1999 6
2000 3
2001 1
2002 1
2003 2
2004 1
2005 0
2006 0
2007 3
2008 1
2009 1
2010 0
2011 0
2012 0
2013 0
2014 0
2015 0
2016 1
2017 0
2018 0
2019 0
2020 0
2021 0
2022 1
Total 102
Download as CSV

Albrecht E. Sippel publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Albrecht E. Sippel sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200
Bar chart with 67 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 45–54 to 703+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 217. Most scientists, 217, have 125–134 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 85–94 publications, is where this scientist sits. 45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45–54 publications 703+

This scientist: 88 publications — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Genetics scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,342 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
45–54 6
55–64 10
65–74 35
75–84 84
85–94 102 88
95–104 151
105–114 175
115–124 203
125–134 217
135–144 205
145–154 193
155–164 188
165–174 170
175–184 178
185–194 164
195–204 173
205–214 159
215–224 134
225–234 143
235–244 105
245–254 114
255–264 92
265–274 88
275–284 87
285–294 80
295–304 62
305–314 75
315–324 67
325–334 60
335–344 52
345–354 40
355–364 48
365–374 47
375–384 46
385–394 31
395–404 27
405–414 40
415–424 30
425–434 43
435–444 29
445–454 14
455–464 28
465–474 21
475–484 21
485–494 22
495–504 17
505–514 12
515–524 11
525–534 8
535–544 8
545–554 14
555–564 4
565–574 11
575–584 5
585–594 11
595–604 12
605–614 7
615–624 6
625–634 10
635–644 9
645–654 10
655–664 6
665–674 6
675–684 6
685–694 4
695–702 6
703+ 100
Download as CSV

Albrecht E. Sippel D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Albrecht E. Sippel sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 160+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 191. Most scientists, 191, have 62–63 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 48–49 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40–41 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 9th percentile

9% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Genetics scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,342 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 24
42–43 52
44–45 84
46–47 112
48–49 118 49
50–51 141
52–53 143
54–55 145
56–57 179
58–59 162
60–61 175
62–63 191
64–65 172
66–67 184
68–69 164
70–71 158
72–73 150
74–75 136
76–77 127
78–79 127
80–81 111
82–83 110
84–85 110
86–87 84
88–89 102
90–91 66
92–93 72
94–95 70
96–97 54
98–99 60
100–101 49
102–103 55
104–105 45
106–107 42
108–109 28
110–111 39
112–113 25
114–115 31
116–117 29
118–119 34
120–121 29
122–123 29
124–125 18
126–127 27
128–129 22
130–131 16
132–133 11
134–135 17
136–137 12
138–139 21
140–141 4
142–143 9
144–145 14
146–147 6
148–149 10
150–151 7
152–153 9
154–155 8
156–157 8
158–159 9
160+ 96
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1992 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
  • Member of the European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO)
  • Member of the European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO)
  • Member of the European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO)

Overview

Albrecht E. Sippel is affiliated with the University of Freiburg in Germany. The academic profile shows no listed publications, co-authors, or specific topics and fields of study associated with their work in the provided data.

Despite the absence of detailed publication records, Albrecht E. Sippel has been recognized within the scientific community by notable awards. They were named a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 1992. Additionally, they are a member of the European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO), reflecting involvement in the molecular biology discipline.

These affiliations and honors indicate engagement with scientific research primarily related to molecular biology or closely related domains, given the nature of the organizations accrediting them. There is no detailed information on specific research topics, subfields, or publication venues linked to their scholarly output in the current data.

The absence of recent papers or co-authors in the data does not preclude ongoing research activity but limits the ability to outline current research directions or collaborative networks. The profile is based strictly on the available verified details without extrapolation beyond the documented facts.

Best Publications

  • Tissue specific and position independent expression of the complete gene domain for chicken lysozyme in transgenic mice.

    Constanze Bonifer;M. Vidal;Frank Grosveld;A.E. Sippel

  • Exons encode functional and structural units of chicken lysozyme

    Alexander Jung;Albrecht E. Sippel;Manuel Grez;Gunther Schutz

  • Purification and characterization of adenosine triphosphate: ribonucleic acid adenyltransferase from Escherichia coli.

    Albrecht E. Sippel

  • Mouse whey acidic protein is a novel member of the family of 'four-disulfide core' proteins.

    Lothar G. Hennighausen;Albrecht E. Sippel

  • The TGGCA protein binds to the MMTV-LTR, the adenovirus origin of replication, and the BK virus enhancer.

    J Nowock;U Borgmeyer;A W Püschel;R A Rupp

  • The TGGCA-binding protein: a eukaryotic nuclear protein recognizing a symmetrical sequence on double-stranded linear DNA

    Uwe Borgmeyer;Joachim Nowock;Albrecht E. Sippel

  • Transcription factor nuclear factor I proteins form stable homo‐ and heterodimers

    Ulrich Kruse;Albrecht E. Sippel

  • Nuclear factor I X deficiency causes brain malformation and severe skeletal defects.

    Katrin Driller;Axel Pagenstecher;Markus Uhl;Heymut Omran

  • Rifampicin Resistance of RNA Polymerase in the Binary Complex with DNA

    Albrecht E. Sippel;Guido R. Hartmann

  • Dynamic chromatin: The regulatory domain organization of eukaryotic gene loci

    Constanze Bonifer;Andreas Hecht;Harald Saueressig;Diana M. Winter

  • Nuclear factor I-B (Nfib) deficient mice have severe lung hypoplasia.

    Albert Gründer;Thorsten T. Ebel;Moisés Mallo;Georg Schwarzkopf

  • Multiple mRNAs are generated from the chicken lysozyme gene.

    Manuel Grez;Hartmut Land;Klaus Giesecke;Günther Schütz

  • Dissection of the locus control function located on the chicken lysozyme gene domain in transgenic mice

    Constanze Bonifer;Nikos Yannoutsos;Gudrun Krüger;Frank Grosveld

  • The lysozyme enhancer: cell-specific activation of the chicken lysozyme gene by a far-upstream DNA element.

    M Theisen;A Stief;A E Sippel

  • Nudease-hypersensitive sites in the chromalin domain of the chicken lysozyme gene

    H. P. Fritton;A. E Sippel;T. Igo-Kemenes

  • mRNA complexity and egg white protein mRNA content in mature and hormone-withdrawn oviduct

    Nancy E. Hynes;Bernd Groner;Albrecht E. Sippel;M.Chi Nguyen-Huu

  • The Genes for Transcription Factor Nuclear Factor I Give Rise to Corresponding Splice Variants between Vertebrate Species

    Ulrich Kruse;Albrecht E. Sippel

  • Control of cellular content of chicken egg white protein specific RNA during estrogen administration and withdrawal.

    Hynes Ne;Hynes Ne;Groner B;Sippel Ae;Jeep S

  • Comparative sequence analysis of the mRNAs coding for mouse and rat whey protein

    Lothar G. Hennighausen;Albrecht E. Sippel;Andrew A. Hobbs;Jeffrey M. Rosen

  • Chromosomal localization of the four genes (NFIA, B, C, and X) for the human transcription factor nuclear factor I by FISH.

    Feng Qian;Ulrich Kruse;Ulrich Kruse;Peter Lichter;Albrecht E. Sippel

Frequent Co-Authors

Constanze Bonifer
Constanze Bonifer University of Birmingham
Günther Schütz
Günther Schütz German Cancer Research Center
Feng Qian
Feng Qian Fudan University
Joachim Thiery
Joachim Thiery Leipzig University
Olga Stein
Olga Stein Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Hartmut Land
Hartmut Land University of Rochester Medical Center
Peter Lichter
Peter Lichter German Cancer Research Center
Lothar Hennighausen
Lothar Hennighausen National Institutes of Health
Thomas Nann
Thomas Nann University of Newcastle Australia
Gerald Urban
Gerald Urban University of Freiburg

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Genetics opens doors to a variety of rewarding careers within the healthcare field. Many students considering genetics also look into roles such as medical billing, healthcare administration, or nursing due to their close connection with medical research and patient care. One common question for aspiring healthcare professionals is how much does it cost to become a medical billing and coding specialist. Costs can vary based on program type and duration, but online options often offer greater affordability and flexibility.

For those interested in direct patient care, securing admission into an easiest bsn program to get into can provide a solid pathway into nursing, complementing a background in genetics or biomedical science. Alternatively, students seeking leadership roles in health organizations might pursue healthcare administration programs to rapidly gain the advanced skills required for management positions.

Cost remains a key consideration for many students. Comparing the online health management degree options can help identify programs that balance price with quality and accreditation. By exploring these related online degrees, you can build a versatile career foundation rooted in the core concepts of genetics and healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Albrecht E. Sippel

Recently Published Articles