World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
48
Citations
26113
World Ranking
18171
National Ranking
7425

Adam Bagg publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Adam Bagg sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 298 publications — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Adam Bagg D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Adam Bagg sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Adam Bagg is affiliated with the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania in the United States and has made substantial contributions in the field of medicine, focusing primarily on hematology, pathology, oncology, genetics, and rheumatology.

Their research spans multiple main and subfields, including:

  • Medicine
  • Hematology
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Oncology
  • Genetics
  • Rheumatology

The topics covered in their work reflect specialized interests, particularly in the diagnosis and treatment of blood cancers and related disorders:

  • Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
  • Viral-associated cancers and disorders
  • Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research
  • Eosinophilic Disorders and Syndromes
  • Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics

Adam Bagg has published numerous papers in several highly regarded scientific venues. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Blood
  • Modern Pathology
  • American Journal of Hematology
  • International Journal of Laboratory Hematology
  • American Journal of Clinical Pathology

Among recent publications authored or co-authored by them are:

  • International Consensus Classification of Myeloid Neoplasms and Acute Leukemias: integrating morphologic, clinical, and genomic data (2022, Blood)
  • Genomic profiling for clinical decision making in myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia (2022, Blood)
  • Genomic profiling for clinical decision making in lymphoid neoplasms (2022, Blood)
  • Comparison of therapy-related and de novo core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia: A bone marrow pathology group study (2020, American Journal of Hematology)
  • Evaluation of Scopio Labs X100 Full Field PBS: The first high-resolution full field viewing of peripheral blood specimens combined with artificial intelligence-based morphological analysis (2021, International Journal of Laboratory Hematology)

Frequent collaborators include:

  • Robert P. Hasserjian
  • Daniel A. Arber
  • Attilio Orazi
  • Sa A. Wang
  • Eric D. Hsi

Best Publications

  • Chimeric Antigen Receptor–Modified T Cells in Chronic Lymphoid Leukemia

    David L. Porter;Bruce L. Levine;Michael Kalos;Adam Bagg

  • T Cells with Chimeric Antigen Receptors Have Potent Antitumor Effects and Can Establish Memory in Patients with Advanced Leukemia

    Michael Kalos;Bruce L. Levine;David L. Porter;Sharyn Katz

  • Chimeric antigen receptor T cells persist and induce sustained remissions in relapsed refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia

    David L. Porter;Wei-Ting Hwang;Noelle V. Frey;Simon F. Lacey

  • Fatal systemic inflammatory response syndrome in a ornithine transcarbamylase deficient patient following adenoviral gene transfer

    Steven E Raper;Narendra Chirmule;Frank S Lee;Nelson A Wivel

  • Cardiovascular toxicity and titin cross-reactivity of affinity-enhanced T cells in myeloma and melanoma

    Gerald P. Linette;Edward A. Stadtmauer;Marcela V. Maus;Aaron P. Rapoport

  • Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells against CD19 for Multiple Myeloma

    Alfred L. Garfall;Marcela V. Maus;Wei-Ting Hwang;Simon F. Lacey

  • International, evidence-based consensus diagnostic criteria for HHV-8–negative/idiopathic multicentric Castleman disease

    David C. Fajgenbaum;Thomas S. Uldrick;Adam Bagg;Dale Frank

  • Survival of acute myeloid leukemia cells requires PI3 kinase activation

    Qing Xu;Serge Emile Simpson;Timothy J. Scialla;Adam Bagg

  • Genetic Inactivation of CD33 in Hematopoietic Stem Cells to Enable CAR T Cell Immunotherapy for Acute Myeloid Leukemia

    Miriam Y. Kim;Kyung Rok Yu;Saad S. Kenderian;Marco Ruella

  • Persistence of long-lived plasma cells and humoral immunity in individuals responding to CD19-directed CAR T-cell therapy

    Vijay G. Bhoj;Dimitrios Arhontoulis;Gerald Wertheim;James Capobianchi

  • Erythropoietin gene therapy leads to autoimmune anemia in macaques

    Guangping Gao;Corinna Lebherz;Daniel J. Weiner;Rebecca Grant

  • In situ mantle cell lymphoma: clinical implications of an incidental finding with indolent clinical behavior

    Alejandra Carvajal-Cuenca;Luz F. Sua;Nhora M. Silva;Stefania Pittaluga

  • Guidance for Fluorescence in Situ Hybridization Testing in Hematologic Disorders

    Daynna J. Wolff;Adam Bagg;Linda D. Cooley;Gordon W. Dewald

  • A robust xenotransplantation model for acute myeloid leukemia.

    P V Sanchez;R L Perry;J E Sarry;A E Perl

  • The Impact of EBV Status on Characteristics and Outcomes of Posttransplantation Lymphoproliferative Disorder

    Marlise R. Luskin;Daniel S. Heil;Kay S. Tan;Sarah Choi

  • Myeloproliferative Disorders and Myelodysplastic Syndromes

    Jo-Anne Vergilio;Adam Bagg

  • A Phase I Study of the Mammalian Target of Rapamycin Inhibitor Sirolimus and MEC Chemotherapy in Relapsed and Refractory Acute Myelogenous Leukemia

    Alexander E. Perl;Margaret T. Kasner;Donald E. Tsai;Dan T. Vogl

  • Chromosome 3q21 abnormalities associated with hyperactive thrombopoiesis in acute blastic transformation of chronic myeloid leukemia.

    R Bernstein;A Bagg;M Pinto;D Lewis

  • Preexisting Immunity to Adenovirus in Rhesus Monkeys Fails To Prevent Vector-Induced Toxicity

    Andrei N. Varnavski;Yi Zhang;Michael Schnell;John Tazelaar

  • Peripheral blood MDS score: a new flow cytometric tool for the diagnosis of myelodysplastic syndromes.

    Sindhu Cherian;Jonni Moore;Andrew Bantly;Jo Anne Vergilio

Frequent Co-Authors

Martin Carroll
Martin Carroll University of Pennsylvania
David L. Porter
David L. Porter University of Pennsylvania
Carlos E. Bueso-Ramos
Carlos E. Bueso-Ramos The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Eric D. Hsi
Eric D. Hsi Cleveland Clinic
Edward A. Stadtmauer
Edward A. Stadtmauer University of Pennsylvania
Carl H. June
Carl H. June University of Pennsylvania
Bruce L. Levine
Bruce L. Levine University of Pennsylvania
Peter C. Nowell
Peter C. Nowell University of Pennsylvania
Michael Kalos
Michael Kalos Next Pillar Consulting
Megan S. Lim
Megan S. Lim University of Pennsylvania

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in Biology or Biochemistry opens the door to a wide range of opportunities in healthcare and allied fields. Many students also look at specialized online degrees that provide flexible entry points into the job market. For instance, understanding medical.coding salary trends can help you evaluate if this rapidly growing field aligns with your career goals and earning expectations.

Before pursuing this path, it’s important to weigh both the benefits and drawbacks. Learn more about is medical coding a good career to help you decide if this role fits your interests and skill set. If you prefer broader roles in managing health records or data, look into affordable health information management degree online options, which are increasingly in demand.

Additionally, a master’s in nutrition can complement your background in biochemistry, opening further specialized roles. Discover the cost of masters degree in nutrition programs and find the most budget-friendly paths to advance your education.

Best Scientists Citing Adam Bagg

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles