Data Sources and Citation Metrics
The 5th edition of the Research.com Best Ecology and Evolution Scientists in Taiwan Ranking was developed using a comprehensive collection of bibliometric data primarily sourced from OpenAlex and CrossRef, supplemented by multiple additional reputable data repositories. Bibliometric data utilized to devise the citation-based metrics were collected on January 12, 2026. To establish a scientist's position in the ranking, a specialized metric called the D-index (Discipline H-index) was employed. The D-index specifically focuses on papers and citation metrics strictly within the examined discipline of Ecology and Evolution, ensuring that the evaluation reflects domain-specific impact rather than general scholarly output.
Scope of Research and Selection Criteria
The construction of this ranking entailed an exhaustive examination of 279,971 scientist profiles drawn from a variety of bibliometric databases spanning all disciplines. Within this broad dataset, 14 scientists specializing in Ecology and Evolution were identified for inclusion. To qualify for the ranking, researchers were required to meet a minimum D-index threshold of 30, with the majority of their tier publications concentrated in the Ecology and Evolution domain. Additionally, a scientist's awards and notable achievements specifically within this field were taken into account as a complementary factor.
The threshold for the D-index was set in increments of 10, aligned proportionally with the estimated total number of scholars in each discipline. This parameterization was designed to ensure that the top 1% of leading scholars across the respective field were incorporated into the list. Furthermore, candidates included in the ranking generally exhibited a proximity of 30% or less between their general H-index and their D-index, underscoring a focused and consistent research contribution within Ecology and Evolution.
Verification and Validation Practices
Recognizing the limitations inherent in relying exclusively on raw bibliometric data, the researchers responsible for this ranking undertook extensive manual verification and cross-correlation of all scientist profiles. This rigorous process involved checking publication records against a wide range of reliable, trustworthy sources to guarantee accuracy and integrity of the data presented.
While the number of papers published in prominent journals and conference proceedings does not directly influence a researcher's rank, it serves as a valuable secondary indicator of an individual’s meaningful contributions to the scientific discourse within a specific field.
The ranking positions are ultimately determined based on each scientist’s D-index derived from information consolidated from OpenAlex and CrossRef—acknowledged as the most prominent and widely respected bibliometric databases accessible to the research community today. For a detailed explanation of the data collection and ranking methodology, we encourage readers to consult our methodology page.
Research.com’s Mission Behind the Ranking
The primary mission driving the creation of this ranking is to inspire researchers, corporate entities, and policymakers worldwide to monitor and understand the trajectories of leading experts. By providing a transparent, methodologically sound framework that identifies the foremost specialists in specific areas of study—whether by country, discipline, or institution—Research.com aims to foster recognition of scientific excellence and facilitate informed decisions across academia, industry, and government.
Our carefully curated ranking offers the scientific community a vital resource for recognizing key contributors in Ecology and Evolution, thereby promoting collaboration, knowledge exchange, and strategic investment in this critical area of research.
