Data Sources and Citation Metrics
The 5th edition of the Research.com Best Animal Science and Veterinary Scientists in Jordan Ranking is derived from a robust compilation of bibliometric data sourced primarily from OpenAlex and CrossRef, in addition to multiple other trusted data repositories. The bibliometric data utilized for generating citation-based metrics were collected on January 12, 2026. A scientist’s position in the ranking is determined by their D-index (Discipline H-index), a specialized metric that exclusively incorporates papers and citation counts pertinent to the Animal Science and Veterinary discipline under review, thereby ensuring precision and relevance in the evaluation process.
Scope of Research and Qualification Criteria
A comprehensive pool of 279,971 scientist profiles identified across various bibliometric databases representing all scientific disciplines was examined. Within this broad spectrum, 1 scientist specializing in Animal Science and Veterinary was specifically analyzed for this ranking. To qualify for inclusion, a scientist’s D-index needed to be at least 20, with a majority of their tier publications published within the Animal Science and Veterinary field.
In addition to the D-index metric, scientists’ awards and notable achievements in Animal Science and Veterinary research were considered to further authenticate their standing. The D-index threshold to identify top researchers is systematically set in increments of 10, proportional to the estimated total population of scholars in each discipline. This approach guarantees that the top 1% of leading experts are represented within the ranking. Furthermore, a proximity criterion is applied, ensuring that the difference between a scientist’s general H-index and their D-index does not exceed 30%, thus maintaining disciplinary specificity.
Verification Practices
Recognizing that raw bibliometric data alone cannot fully capture the scholarly output and impact of researchers, the Research.com team implemented meticulous manual verification practices. Each scientist profile included in the ranking was cross-checked against a broad array of reputable publication sources to ensure accuracy and authenticity.
While the number of publications in prominent journals and conference proceedings does not directly influence the researcher’s ranking position, it serves as a valuable secondary indicator of scientific contribution within a discipline. The ranking framework relies primarily on the D-index calculated from data obtained through OpenAlex and CrossRef—two of the most prominent and reliable bibliometric databases accessible to the global research community.
For comprehensive details on the methodology applied in producing this ranking, readers are encouraged to visit our methodology page.
Research.com Agenda and Mission
The overarching mission of Research.com in publishing this ranking is to inspire researchers, corporate stakeholders, and policymakers worldwide to critically examine the trajectories of leading scientific experts. By presenting clear identification of the foremost specialists in specific fields, regions, and institutions, Research.com provides the global scientific community with a transparent and authoritative platform to recognize and connect with preeminent thought leaders. This initiative fosters greater collaboration, informs strategic research investment, and supports evidence-based decision-making across academia and industry.