0191-8869
Published by: Elsevier
https://www.journals.elsevier.com/personality-and-individual-differences
| Discipline name | Position | Best Scientists | Publications | D-Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 19 | 663 | 946 | 50 |
| Social Sciences and Humanities | 279 | 35 | 43 | 13 |
The primary areas of discussion in the journal are Developmental psychology, Social psychology, Personality, Clinical psychology and Big Five personality traits. The journal centers on topics in Developmental psychology, with a focus on Psychometrics. Psychometrics research presented in Personality and Individual Differences encompasses a variety of subjects, including Test validity and Personality test.
Some problems in Social psychology that were presented in the journal overlapped with concepts under Test (assessment), Context (language use), Perception and Scale (social sciences). Extraversion and introversion, Neuroticism, Conscientiousness, Agreeableness and Psychoticism are among the areas of Personality tackled. The study on Neuroticism presented is investigated in conjunction with research in Eysenck Personality Questionnaire.
The work on Clinical psychology tackled in the journal brings together disciplines like Psychiatry and Depression (differential diagnoses). Personality and Individual Differences connects research in Big Five personality traits with the related topic of Openness to experience. The work tackled in the journal goes beyond the discipline of Cognition as it also encompasses Cognitive psychology.
The most cited publications cover a variety of subjects, including Developmental psychology, Personality, Social psychology, Big Five personality traits and Psychometrics. The study of Developmental psychology in the published articles encompasses disciplines such as Cognition, as well as fields such as Cognitive psychology, all of which overlap with one another. The most cited articles investigate Personality research which frequently intersects with Clinical psychology.
Personality and Individual Differences mainly tackles studies in Social psychology, Clinical psychology, Developmental psychology, Personality and Big Five personality traits. The Social psychology works featured in the journal incorporate elements from Perception and Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The journal addresses concerns in the field of Clinical psychology by exploring it in line with topics in Mental health which intersect with Moderation subjects.
The Developmental psychology studies in it expound on topics in
A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.
The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.
The top authors publishing in Personality and Individual Differences (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.
Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered
The top affiliations publishing in Personality and Individual Differences (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.
The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.
The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.
During the most recent 2022 edition, 12.16% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 6.15% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another 6.15% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 7.69% of all publications and 80.00% were from other institutions.
A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.
The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.
The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.
Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).
The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:
The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.
If you're intrigued by the field of personality differences and individual differences and considering a career in research, there are several paths available. Depending on your particular area of interest, you may choose to focus on fields such as developmental psychology, social psychology, or clinical psychology. To enhance your knowledge and deepen your research abilities in these areas, focusing on subjects like the Five Factor Model, emotional intelligence, and Psychoticism scale can prove beneficial.
Those interested in a career in forensic science may note that the research skills gained in these areas can also be valuable. Understanding concepts such as psychometrics and test validity, as well as developing an understanding of personality traits, can contribute to effective work in forensic investigation. For an in-depth guide on how to pursue this type of career, consider reading our article on how to become a forensic investigator in Rhode Island.
Beyond forensic research, these skills can also be applied to developing an effective patient-related strategy in clinical psychology or creating a robust model of social behaviour in social psychology. Successful careers in these fields are typically built on a foundation of thorough research, rigorous analysis, and the ability to apply theoretical knowledge in real-world scenarios.
Whether your passion lies in investigating personality traits, social interactions, or developmental stages, a strong commitment to research will put you on the path to a rewarding career in your chosen field. Start exploring the various areas and determine which path aligns best with your career goals and personal interests.
Manuela Barreto;Christina Victor;Claudia Hammond;Alice Eccles
(2021)Linda C. Karlsson;Anna Soveri;Stephan Lewandowsky;Linnea Karlsson
(2021)Marcin Zajenkowski;Peter K. Jonason;Maria Leniarska;Zuzanna Kozakiewicz
(2020)John Kerr;Costas Panagopoulos;Sander van der Linden
(2021)Sam Liu;Alexander Lithopoulos;Chun-Qing Zhang;Chun-Qing Zhang;Chun-Qing Zhang;Mauricio A. Garcia-Barrera
(2021)Neophytos Georgiou;Paul Delfabbro;Ryan Balzan
(2020)Jon Chao Hong;Yi Fang Lee;Jian Hong Ye
(2021)Murat Yıldırım;Murat Yıldırım;Abdurrahim Güler
(2021)Bartłomiej Nowak;Paweł Brzóska;Jarosław Piotrowski;Constantine Sedikides
(2020)For those interested in expanding their expertise beyond a traditional psychology degree, online programs offer flexible pathways tailored to diverse career goals. Social work is a natural complement to psychology, and students seeking advanced knowledge can explore the most affordable online msw programs to balance quality education with cost-effectiveness.
Accelerated programs are also gaining popularity for their fast-paced approach. If you don’t have a Bachelor of Social Work (BSW), consider looking into 1 year msw programs online no bsw, which enable quicker entry into advanced practice roles.
For psychology majors focused on speedier completion, many institutions now offer a fast track psychology degree, providing an efficient route to earning your degree and starting your career.
Those aiming for licensure as professional counselors should also consider cheapest cacrep-accredited programs online. CACREP accreditation ensures the program meets rigorous standards, which is essential for career advancement and licensure in many states.