| Discipline name | Position | Best Scientists | Publications | D-Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences and Humanities | 191 | 19 | 46 | 16 |
The topics of Bioethics, Law, Social psychology, Epistemology and Argument are the focal point of discussions in Bioethics. The concepts on Bioethics presented in it can also apply to other research fields, including Context (language use), Engineering ethics, Public relations, Environmental ethics and Social science. The Public relations study tackled is a key component of adjacent topics in the area of Health care.
It links adjacent topics like Law with Law and economics. The journal focuses on Social psychology as well as the interrelated topic of Autonomy. The study on Autonomy presented is investigated in conjunction with research in Informed consent.
The most cited articles investigate studies in Bioethics, Law, Social psychology, Epistemology and Autonomy. While work presented in the journal publications provide substantial information on Bioethics, it also covers topics in Applied ethics, Public relations, Environmental ethics, Social science and Empirical research. The journal articles hold forums on Law that merge themes from other disciplines such as Context (language use), Argument and Law and economics.
Bioethics was organized to reinforce research efforts on Bioethics, Autonomy, Health care, Law and economics and Public relations. The presented Bioethics research provided insight into the related
The study of Context (language use) and how it intertwines with concepts under Artificial intelligence were explored in the presented Health care research. In Bioethics, Control (management), Right to health and Harm are investigated in conjunction with one another to address concerns in Law and economics research. Issues in Harm were discussed, taking into consideration concepts from other disciplines like Argument and Abortion.
A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.
The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.
The top authors publishing in Bioethics (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.
Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered
The top affiliations publishing in Bioethics (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.
The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.
The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.
During the most recent 2021 edition, 11.11% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 20.39% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another 8.55% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 14.47% of all publications and 56.58% were from other institutions.
A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.
The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.
The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.
Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).
The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:
The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.
Bioethics, while a crucial subject for academic research, also holds significant implications for practical application, such as in the sphere of healthcare, law, and social work. The nuanced understanding and application of bioethical principles can greatly influence these sectors, particularly in shaping their policies and practices concerning moral and ethical dilemmas.
For instance, individuals adept in bioethics can consider a career as a substance abuse counselor. This profession calls for a deep understanding of bioethical issues as it involves dealing with addiction behaviors and assisting clients in overcoming dependencies. Substance abuse counselors apply bioethical principles to respect client autonomy, secure informed consent, and maintain confidentiality, among other responsibilities.
Specific credentials may be required for pursuing such roles, particularly in certain U.S. states. For example, to qualify as a substance abuse counselor in Virginia, specific licensing procedures and certification requirements need to be met. Those interested in exploring this career path can learn more by checking our in-depth guide on how to become a certified Substance abuse counselor in Virginia.
In conclusion, mastering bioethics not only equips individuals to contribute more relevantly in academic debates but also opens up intriguing opportunities for practical application and career advancement.
Julian Savulescu;Ingmar Persson;Ingmar Persson;Dominic Wilkinson;Dominic Wilkinson
(2020)Julian Savulescu;Christopher Gyngell;Guy Kahane
(2021)Alberto Giubilini;Julian Savulescu;Dominic Wilkinson
(2021)Wendy A. Rogers;Heather Draper;Stacy M. Carter
(2021)Seppe Segers;Guido Pennings;Heidi Mertes
(2020)Marcos Alonso;Julian Savulescu
(2021)Julian J. Koplin;Christopher Gyngell;Julian Savulescu
(2020)Lauren Notini;Christopher Gyngell;Julian Savulescu
(2020)Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities fields opens up diverse career paths, many of which can be accessed through flexible online education options. For those interested in information management and public resources, pursuing one of the ala accredited mlis programs can lead to rewarding roles in library science and archival services.
If you’re wondering is library science a good degree, the answer is yes—this field offers stable employment opportunities with the chance to work in diverse environments like schools, museums, and government agencies.
On the other hand, those drawn to societal behavior and structures may find value in an accredited online bachelors in sociology. This degree can pave the way for careers in social research, community outreach, or policy development.
For professionals aiming to support mental health and well-being, considering online counseling phd programs provides a pathway to advanced clinical roles and leadership positions in counseling and therapy.
