World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
42
Citations
5357
World Ranking
8533
National Ranking
3645

Zijiang Yang publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Zijiang Yang sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 145 publications — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Zijiang Yang D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Zijiang Yang sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Zijiang Yang is affiliated with Western Michigan University in the United States and has contributed significantly to research across engineering and computer science fields. Their work spans main areas including Engineering and Computer Science, with a considerable focus on subfields such as Artificial Intelligence, Management Science and Operations Research, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Materials Chemistry, and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

Their research covers topics that include Efficiency Analysis Using DEA, Inflammatory Bowel Disease, Acoustic Wave Resonator Technologies, Machine Learning in Materials Science, Speech Recognition and Synthesis, Eosinophilic Esophagitis, and Microplastics and Plastic Pollution.

Among recent published papers, notable works include:

  • "Enabling deeper learning on big data for materials informatics applications" (2021) in Scientific Reports
  • "Relation-based test case prioritization for regression testing" (2020) in Journal of Systems and Software
  • "Explanation-guided fairness testing through genetic algorithm" (2022) in Proceedings of the 44th International Conference on Software Engineering
  • "The prevalence of oral frailty among older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis" (2024) in European Geriatric Medicine
  • "Learning to Predict Crystal Plasticity at the Nanoscale: Deep Residual Networks and Size Effects in Uniaxial Compression Discrete Dislocation Simulations" (2020) in Scientific Reports

Frequent co-authors who have collaborated extensively with Zijiang Yang include Björn W. Schuller, Meishu Song, Natalie A. Terry, Andreas Triantafyllopoulos, and Xin Jing.

Yang's publications are often found in widely recognized venues. The most frequent publication sources include arXiv (Cornell University), Gastroenterology, SSRN Electronic Journal, Marine Pollution Bulletin, and The American Journal of Gastroenterology.

Best Publications

  • Deep learning approaches for mining structure-property linkages in high contrast composites from simulation datasets

    Zijiang Yang;Yuksel C. Yabansu;Reda Al-Bahrani;Wei keng Liao

  • System und verfahren zum modellieren, abstrahieren und analysieren von software

    Franjo Ivancic;Pranav N. Ashar;Malay K. Ganai;Aarti Gupta

  • Microstructural Materials Design Via Deep Adversarial Learning Methodology

    Zijiang Yang;Xiaolin Li;L. Catherine Brinson;Alok N. Choudhary

  • Establishing structure-property localization linkages for elastic deformation of three-dimensional high contrast composites using deep learning approaches

    Zijiang Yang;Yuksel C. Yabansu;Dipendra Jha;Wei keng Liao

  • Software defect prediction based on kernel PCA and weighted extreme learning machine

    Zhou Xu;Zhou Xu;Jin Liu;Jin Liu;Xiapu Luo;Zijiang Yang

  • F-SOFT: software verification platform

    F. Ivančić;Z. Yang;M. K. Ganai;A. Gupta

  • Efficient SAT-based bounded model checking for software verification

    Franjo Ivančić;Zijiang Yang;Malay K. Ganai;Aarti Gupta

  • The Impact of Feature Selection on Defect Prediction Performance: An Empirical Comparison

    Zhou Xu;Jin Liu;Zijiang Yang;Gege An

  • SAT-Based Image Computation with Application in Reachability Analysis

    Aarti Gupta;Zijiang Yang;Pranav Ashar;Anubhav Gupta

  • Model checking C programs using F-Soft

    F. Ivancic;I. Shlyakhter;A. Gupta;M.K. Ganai

  • Meta-analysis of the need for nasogastric or nasojejunal decompression after gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

    Z Yang;Q Zheng;Z Wang

  • Iterative Abstraction using SAT-based BMC with Proof Analysis

    Aarti Gupta;Malay Ganai;Zijiang Yang;Pranav Ashar

  • Peephole partial order reduction

    Chao Wang;Zijiang Yang;Vineet Kahlon;Aarti Gupta

  • Is There a Best Symbolic Cycle-Detection Algorithm?

    Kathi Fisler;Kathi Fisler;Ranan Fraer;Gila Kamhi;Moshe Y. Vardi

  • Generating data race witnesses by an SMT-based analysis

    Mahmoud Said;Chao Wang;Zijiang Yang;Karem Sakallah

  • Partition-based decision heuristics for image computation using SAT and BDDs

    Aarti Gupta;Zijiang Yang;Pranav Ashar;Lintao Zhang

  • Opportunistic Networks for Emergency Applications and Their Standard Implementation Framework

    L. Lilien;A. Gupta;Zijiang Yang

  • Numerical and experimental investigation on nozzle parameters for R410A ejector air conditioning system

    Jichao Hu;Junye Shi;Yuanyuan Liang;Zijiang Yang

  • Software Plagiarism Detection with Birthmarks Based on Dynamic Key Instruction Sequences

    Zhenzhou Tian;Qinghua Zheng;Ting Liu;Ming Fan

  • sCompile: Critical path identification and analysis for smart contracts

    Jialiang Chang;Bo Gao;Hao Xiao;Jun Sun

Frequent Co-Authors

Aarti Gupta
Aarti Gupta Princeton University
Chao Wang
Chao Wang University of Southern California
Qinghua Zheng
Qinghua Zheng Xi'an Jiaotong University
Alok Choudhary
Alok Choudhary Northwestern University
Ankit Agrawal
Ankit Agrawal Northwestern University
Franjo Ivancic
Franjo Ivancic Google (United States)
Wei-keng Liao
Wei-keng Liao Northwestern University
Shiyong Lu
Shiyong Lu Wayne State University
Pranav Ashar
Pranav Ashar NEC (United States)
Surya R. Kalidindi
Surya R. Kalidindi Georgia Institute of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science doesn't have to mean following a single, traditional route. Today, students can pursue a computer science degree online for greater flexibility and accessibility. These programs allow learners to study at their own pace, making them ideal for working adults or those looking to accelerate their education.

Entry requirements have also evolved. Many online graduate schools with low gpa requirements make it possible for students with non-traditional academic backgrounds to start or continue their studies in related technical fields.

If you're interested in blending technology with environmental stewardship, there are also environmental engineering schools online that offer affordable, specialized degrees. These programs often intersect with computer science through areas like modeling, simulation, and data analytics.

Graduates have diverse career options. To learn more about opportunities outside of computer science, discover what can you do with an environmental studies degree—from research to policy and tech-driven roles. Broadening your degree search and exploring related pathways can help you tailor your educational journey to your interests and career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Zijiang Yang

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles