World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering

D-Index
32
Citations
3632
World Ranking
3196
National Ranking
394

Xueyuan Peng publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Xueyuan Peng sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 659+

This scientist: 219 publications — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

Xueyuan Peng D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Xueyuan Peng sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Experimental investigation of the discharge valve dynamics in a reciprocating compressor for trans-critical CO2 refrigeration cycle.

    Unknown

  • Development of a double acting free piston expander for power recovery in transcritical co2 cycle

    Unknown

  • Fault diagnosis of reciprocating compressor valve with the method integrating acoustic emission signal and simulated valve motion

    Unknown

  • A review of key components of hydrogen recirculation subsystem for fuel cell vehicles

    Unknown

  • 3D transient CFD modelling of a scroll-type hydrogen pump used in FCVs

    Unknown

  • Improved rotary vane expander for trans-critical CO2 cycle by introducing high-pressure gas into the vane slots

    Unknown

  • Numerical investigation of the effects of the central channel on the flow field in an oil–gas cyclone separator

    Unknown

  • Performance investigation of a multi-nozzle ejector for proton exchange membrane fuel cell system

    Unknown

  • FSI model of valve motion and pressure pulsation for investigating thermodynamic process and internal flow inside a reciprocating compressor

    Unknown

  • Performance prediction and evaluation of the scroll-type hydrogen pump for FCVs based on CFD–Taguchi method

    Unknown

  • Three-dimensional numerical simulation and experimental validation of flows in working chambers and inlet/outlet pockets of Roots pump

    Unknown

  • Investigation on the oil–gas separation efficiency considering oil droplets breakup and collision in a swirling flow

    Unknown

  • Transient flow field and performance analysis of a claw pump for FCVs

    Unknown

  • A multi-objective parametric study of the claw hydrogen pump for fuel cell vehicles using taguchi method and ANN

    Unknown

  • Research on sealing performance and self-acting valve reliability in high-pressure oil-free hydrogen compressors for hydrogen refueling stations

    Unknown

  • Performance Study of an Advanced Adiabatic Compressed Air Energy Storage System

    Hamidreza Mozayeni;Michael Negnevitsky;Xiaolin Wang;Feng Cao

  • A novel profile with high efficiency for hydrogen-circulating Roots pumps used in FCVs

    Unknown

  • Effect of hydraulic oil compressibility on the volumetric efficiency of a diaphragm compressor for hydrogen refueling stations

    Unknown

  • Investigation on the delayed closure of the suction valve in the refrigerator compressor by FSI modeling

    Unknown

  • Mathematical modelling and design of the ionic liquid compressor for the hydrogen refuelling station

    Unknown

Frequent Co-Authors

Xiaolin Wang
Xiaolin Wang University of Tasmania
Yan Zhao
Yan Zhao Wuhan University of Technology
Yu Zhang
Yu Zhang Chinese Academy of Sciences

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

While Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering focus on designing and building advanced machinery and aircraft, students often explore related fields to broaden their career opportunities. For those interested in interdisciplinary careers, understanding the requirements of other specialized degree programs can be valuable. For example, if you are curious about health sciences, you might want to explore speech language pathology graduate programs to see how admission standards compare with engineering fields.

When considering online education options, some prospective students prioritize programs that are more accessible. Checking out the easiest online slp programs to get into can offer insights into flexible pathways that might fit different schedules or academic backgrounds, an important consideration for those balancing work or family commitments.

Cost is another crucial factor in choosing an online degree. Evaluating how much does an online speech pathology degree cost helps students budget their education realistically, and similar financial planning applies to engineering degrees as well.

Finally, veterans looking to transition into or advance their careers through education will find tailored support and programs. Exploring options like online speech pathology degrees for veterans highlights available benefits and resources, which are also relevant to veterans seeking engineering degrees.

Best Scientists Citing Xueyuan Peng

Recently Published Articles