World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
38
Citations
32681
World Ranking
9921
National Ranking
4167

Xiaohua Zhai publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Xiaohua Zhai sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 250 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 560 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 424 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 378 scientists 262–271 publications: 300 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 64 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Xiaohua Zhai D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Xiaohua Zhai sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 984 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 969 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 765 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 517 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Xiaohua Zhai is affiliated with Google in the United States and has contributed extensively to the field of computer science, with a strong focus on computer vision and artificial intelligence. Their research spans multiple subfields including computer vision and pattern recognition, artificial intelligence, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, materials chemistry, and electrical and electronic engineering.

Their work involves several main research topics such as domain adaptation and few-shot learning, multimodal machine learning applications, advanced neural network applications, advanced image and video retrieval techniques, natural language processing techniques, COVID-19 diagnosis using AI, and topic modeling.

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Xiaohua Zhai include Lucas Beyer, Neil Houlsby, А. И. Колесников, Andreas Steiner, and Ibrahim Alabdulmohsin, indicating a collaborative approach across diverse teams and research focuses.

Publications by Xiaohua Zhai have appeared primarily in the following venues:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)
  • Lecture Notes in Computer Science
  • International Journal of Computer Vision
  • ACS Nano

Significant recent papers include:

  • "Scaling Vision Transformers," 2022, 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)
  • "LiT: Zero-Shot Transfer with Locked-image text Tuning," 2022, 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)
  • "MLP-Mixer: An all-MLP Architecture for Vision," 2021, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scale," 2020, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "Underspecification Presents Challenges for Credibility in Modern Machine Learning," 2020, arXiv (Cornell University)

The volume and scope of their publications demonstrate active engagement with ongoing advancements in vision transformer models and challenges in machine learning credibility. Xiaohua Zhai has contributed to foundational research shaping domain adaptation, multimodal learning, and neural network architectures.

Their academic footprint reflects a balance between theoretical frameworks and transformative applications across machine learning disciplines, focusing on both performance and transferability of models in computer vision and related fields.

Best Publications

  • An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scale

    Alexey Dosovitskiy;Lucas Beyer;Alexander Kolesnikov;Dirk Weissenborn

  • MLP-Mixer: An all-MLP Architecture for Vision

    Ilya Tolstikhin;Neil Houlsby;Alexander Kolesnikov;Lucas Beyer

  • Big Transfer (BiT): General Visual Representation Learning

    Alexander Kolesnikov;Lucas Beyer;Xiaohua Zhai;Joan Puigcerver

  • Revisiting Self-Supervised Visual Representation Learning

    Alexander Kolesnikov;Xiaohua Zhai;Lucas Beyer

  • Scaling Vision Transformers

    Xiaohua Zhai;Alexander Kolesnikov;Neil Houlsby;Lucas Beyer

  • S4L: Self-Supervised Semi-Supervised Learning

    Lucas Beyer;Xiaohua Zhai;Avital Oliver;Alexander Kolesnikov

  • PaLI: A Jointly-Scaled Multilingual Language-Image Model

    Unknown

  • Underspecification Presents Challenges for Credibility in Modern Machine Learning

    Alexander D'Amour;Katherine A. Heller;Dan Moldovan;Ben Adlam

  • Sigmoid Loss for Language Image Pre-Training

    Unknown

  • Self-Supervised GANs via Auxiliary Rotation Loss

    Ting Chen;Xiaohua Zhai;Marvin Ritter;Mario Lucic

  • LiT: Zero-Shot Transfer with Locked-image Text Tuning

    Xiaohua Zhai;Xiao Wang;Basil Mustafa;Andreas Steiner

  • Scaling Vision Transformers to 22 Billion Parameters

    Unknown

  • S4L: Self-Supervised Semi-Supervised Learning

    Xiaohua Zhai;Avital Oliver;Alexander Kolesnikov;Lucas Beyer

  • Learning Cross-Media Joint Representation With Sparse and Semisupervised Regularization

    Xiaohua Zhai;Yuxin Peng;Jianguo Xiao

  • Simple Open-Vocabulary Object Detection

    Unknown

  • A Large-scale Study of Representation Learning with the Visual Task Adaptation Benchmark

    Xiaohua Zhai;Joan Puigcerver;Alexander Kolesnikov;Pierre Ruyssen

  • Knowledge distillation: A good teacher is patient and consistent

    Lucas Beyer;Xiaohua Zhai;Amélie Royer;Larisa Markeeva

  • Semi-Supervised Cross-Media Feature Learning With Unified Patch Graph Regularization

    Yuxin Peng;Xiaohua Zhai;Yunzhen Zhao;Xin Huang

  • The GAN Landscape: Losses, Architectures, Regularization, and Normalization

    Karol Kurach;Mario Lucic;Xiaohua Zhai;Marcin Michalski

  • Heterogeneous metric learning with joint graph regularization for cross-media retrieval

    Xiaohua Zhai;Yuxin Peng;Jianguo Xiao

  • High-Fidelity Image Generation With Fewer Labels

    Mario Lucic;Michael Tschannen;Marvin Ritter;Xiaohua Zhai

  • Are we done with ImageNet

    Lucas Beyer;Olivier J. Hénaff;Alexander Kolesnikov;Xiaohua Zhai

  • A Large-Scale Study on Regularization and Normalization in GANs

    Karol Kurach;Mario Lučić;Xiaohua Zhai;Marcin Michalski

  • The Visual Task Adaptation Benchmark

    Xiaohua Zhai;Joan Puigcerver;Alexander Kolesnikov;Pierre Ruyssen

Frequent Co-Authors

Mario Lucic
Mario Lucic Google (United States)
Sylvain Gelly
Sylvain Gelly Google (United States)
Yuxin Peng
Yuxin Peng Peking University
Jianguo Xiao
Jianguo Xiao Peking University
Alexey Dosovitskiy
Alexey Dosovitskiy Google (United States)
Daniel Keysers
Daniel Keysers Google (United States)
Hugo Larochelle
Hugo Larochelle Google (United States)
Dustin Tran
Dustin Tran Google (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science in the USA opens doors to a range of related fields. Students often branch into disciplines like data science, engineering, or physics, discovering new career options through flexible online programs. With the demand for STEM professionals rising, online education has made degree pathways more accessible and affordable than ever.

If you're interested in engineering, consider the cheapest mechanical engineering degree online options to keep costs manageable. Similarly, a bachelor of science in physics online can be a great fit for those who wish to pursue analytical or research-based roles.

Data science is another rapidly growing area. Many universities now offer dedicated data science degrees online, allowing students to specialize in big data, machine learning, and analytics. Those with an interest in electronics might prefer to explore programs featured in the online electrical engineering degree ranking, which highlights top accredited programs.

Regardless of your chosen path, online STEM degrees provide the flexibility and credentials needed to advance in today's tech-driven workforce.

Best Scientists Citing Xiaohua Zhai

Trending Scientists