World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
51
Citations
11779
World Ranking
5468
National Ranking
131

Wolfgang Froestl publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Wolfgang Froestl sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 113 publications — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Wolfgang Froestl D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Wolfgang Froestl sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • GABAB-RECEPTOR SUBTYPES ASSEMBLE INTO FUNCTIONAL HETEROMERIC COMPLEXES

    Klemens Kaupmann;Barbara Malitschek;Valerie Schuler;Jakob Heid

  • Expression cloning of GABA(B) receptors uncovers similarity to metabotropic glutamate receptors.

    Klemens Kaupmann;Katharina Huggel;Jakob Heid;Peter J. Flor

  • Epilepsy, hyperalgesia, impaired memory, and loss of pre- and postsynaptic GABA(B) responses in mice lacking GABA(B(1))

    Valérie Schuler;Christian Lüscher;Christophe Blanchet;Norman Klix

  • Genetic and Pharmacological Evidence of a Role for GABA B Receptors in the Modulation of Anxiety- and Antidepressant-Like Behavior

    Cedric Mombereau;Klemens Kaupmann;Wolfgang Froestl;Gilles Sansig

  • Positive allosteric modulation of native and recombinant gamma-aminobutyric acid(B) receptors by 2,6-Di-tert-butyl-4-(3-hydroxy-2,2-dimethyl-propyl)-phenol (CGP7930) and its aldehyde analog CGP13501.

    Stephan Urwyler;Johannes Mosbacher;Kurt Lingenhoehl;Jakob Heid

  • C-terminal interaction is essential for surface trafficking but not for heteromeric assembly of GABA(b) receptors.

    Adriana Pagano;Giorgio Rovelli;Johannes Mosbacher;Tania Lohmann;Tania Lohmann

  • CGP 35348: a centrally active blocker of GABAB receptors.

    H R Olpe;G Karlsson;M F Pozza;F Brugger

  • Behavioral Characterization of the Novel GABAB Receptor-Positive Modulator GS39783 (N,N′-Dicyclopentyl-2-methylsulfanyl-5-nitro-pyrimidine-4,6-diamine): Anxiolytic-Like Activity without Side Effects Associated with Baclofen or Benzodiazepines

    John F. Cryan;Peter H. Kelly;Frederique Chaperon;Conrad Gentsch

  • Phosphinic acid analogues of GABA. 2. Selective, orally active GABAB antagonists.

    Froestl W;Mickel Sj;von Sprecher G;Diel Pj

  • Redistribution of GABAB(1) Protein and Atypical GABAB Responses in GABAB(2)-Deficient Mice

    Martin Gassmann;Hamdy Shaban;Réjan Vigot;Gilles Sansig

  • N,N′-Dicyclopentyl-2-methylsulfanyl-5-nitro-pyrimidine-4,6-diamine (GS39783) and Structurally Related Compounds: Novel Allosteric Enhancers of γ-Aminobutyric AcidB Receptor Function

    Stephan Urwyler;Mario F. Pozza;Kurt Lingenhoehl;Johannes Mosbacher

  • Phosphinic acid analogues of GABA. 1. New potent and selective GABAB agonists.

    Wolfgang Froestl;Stuart J. Mickel;Roger G. Hall;Georg von Sprecher

  • Mutagenesis and modeling of the GABAB receptor extracellular domain support a venus flytrap mechanism for ligand binding

    Thierry Galvez;Marie-Laure Parmentier;Cécile Joly;Barbara Malitschek

  • The effects of GABAB agonists and gabapentin on mechanical hyperalgesia in models of neuropathic and inflammatory pain in the rat

    Sadhana Patel;Sami Naeem;Adam Kesingland;Wolfgang Froestl

  • SGS742: the first GABAB receptor antagonist in clinical trials

    Wolfgang Froestl;Michela Gallagher;Helen Jenkins;Annette Madrid

  • Specific γ-hydroxybutyrate-binding sites but loss of pharmacological effects of γ-hydroxybutyrate in GABAB(1)-deficient mice

    Klemens Kaupmann;John F. Cryan;Petrine Wellendorph;Cedric Mombereau

  • Human γ-aminobutyric acid type B receptors are differentially expressed and regulate inwardly rectifying K+ channels

    Klemens Kaupmann;Valerie Schuler;Johannes Mosbacher;Serge Bischoff

  • Pharmacologic rescue of lethal seizures in mice deficient in succinate semialdehyde dehydrogenase.

    Boris M. Hogema;Boris M. Hogema;Boris M. Hogema;Maneesh Gupta;Henry Senephansiri;Terry G. Burlingame

  • The GABAB receptor agonists baclofen and CGP44532 decreased nicotine self-administration in the rat.

    Neil E. Paterson;Wolfgang Froestl;Athina Markou

  • Mapping the Agonist-binding Site of GABAB Type 1 Subunit Sheds Light on the Activation Process of GABABReceptors

    Thierry Galvez;Laurent Prézeau;Gérald Milioti;Miloslav Franek;Miloslav Franek

Frequent Co-Authors

Klemens Kaupmann
Klemens Kaupmann Novartis (Switzerland)
Christian Marescaux
Christian Marescaux Grenoble Alpes University
Bernhard Bettler
Bernhard Bettler University of Basel
Pascal Furet
Pascal Furet Novartis (Switzerland)
Athina Markou
Athina Markou University of California, San Diego
Gian Luigi Gessa
Gian Luigi Gessa University of Cagliari
Roland R. Griffiths
Roland R. Griffiths Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Paolo Paganetti
Paolo Paganetti Universita della Svizzera Italiana
John F. Cryan
John F. Cryan University College Cork
Jean-Philippe Pin
Jean-Philippe Pin University of Montpellier

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Wolfgang Froestl

Recently Published Articles