| Discipline name | D-Index | World Ranking | Current World Ranking | National Ranking | Current National Ranking | Publications | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 41 | 8619 | 8374 | 3694 | 3550 | 103 | 12127 |
The chart shows the history of publications by William A. Arbaugh between 1997 and 2016, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. William A. Arbaugh published across 20 years, from 1997 to 2016, averaging 5.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 21 publications in 2004. 2 of the 105 publications appeared in the last two years.
105 publications in total across all disciplines
| Year | Publications |
|---|---|
| 1997 | 2 |
| 1998 | 8 |
| 1999 | 1 |
| 2000 | 4 |
| 2001 | 7 |
| 2002 | 6 |
| 2003 | 18 |
| 2004 | 21 |
| 2005 | 11 |
| 2006 | 13 |
| 2007 | 4 |
| 2008 | 3 |
| 2009 | 2 |
| 2010 | 1 |
| 2011 | 1 |
| 2012 | 0 |
| 2013 | 1 |
| 2014 | 0 |
| 2015 | 1 |
| 2016 | 1 |
| Total | 105 |
The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William A. Arbaugh sits on this spectrum.
This scientist: 103 publications — 9th percentile
9% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.
The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.
| Publications | Scientists | This scientist |
|---|---|---|
| 32–41 | 7 | |
| 42–51 | 22 | |
| 52–61 | 82 | |
| 62–71 | 134 | |
| 72–81 | 249 | |
| 82–91 | 324 | |
| 92–101 | 421 | |
| 102–111 | 420 | 103 |
| 112–121 | 497 | |
| 122–131 | 544 | |
| 132–141 | 555 | |
| 142–151 | 609 | |
| 152–161 | 559 | |
| 162–171 | 534 | |
| 172–181 | 556 | |
| 182–191 | 583 | |
| 192–201 | 519 | |
| 202–211 | 508 | |
| 212–221 | 490 | |
| 222–231 | 437 | |
| 232–241 | 423 | |
| 242–251 | 408 | |
| 252–261 | 377 | |
| 262–271 | 301 | |
| 272–281 | 335 | |
| 282–291 | 320 | |
| 292–301 | 293 | |
| 302–311 | 250 | |
| 312–321 | 238 | |
| 322–331 | 206 | |
| 332–341 | 209 | |
| 342–351 | 208 | |
| 352–361 | 162 | |
| 362–371 | 176 | |
| 372–381 | 127 | |
| 382–391 | 158 | |
| 392–401 | 128 | |
| 402–411 | 104 | |
| 412–421 | 94 | |
| 422–431 | 99 | |
| 432–441 | 83 | |
| 442–451 | 108 | |
| 452–461 | 73 | |
| 462–471 | 77 | |
| 472–481 | 69 | |
| 482–491 | 84 | |
| 492–501 | 62 | |
| 502–511 | 54 | |
| 512–521 | 57 | |
| 522–531 | 51 | |
| 532–541 | 51 | |
| 542–551 | 32 | |
| 552–561 | 38 | |
| 562–571 | 28 | |
| 572–581 | 43 | |
| 582–591 | 33 | |
| 592–601 | 41 | |
| 602–611 | 32 | |
| 612–621 | 28 | |
| 622–631 | 25 | |
| 632–641 | 27 | |
| 642–651 | 17 | |
| 652–661 | 20 | |
| 662–671 | 17 | |
| 672–681 | 15 | |
| 682–691 | 14 | |
| 692–701 | 21 | |
| 702–711 | 13 | |
| 712–721 | 12 | |
| 722–731 | 19 | |
| 732–741 | 14 | |
| 742–751 | 12 | |
| 752–761 | 10 | |
| 762–771 | 10 | |
| 772–781 | 11 | |
| 782–791 | 10 | |
| 792–801 | 11 | |
| 802–811 | 8 | |
| 812–821 | 8 | |
| 822–831 | 7 | |
| 832–841 | 11 | |
| 842–851 | 10 | |
| 852–861 | 5 | |
| 862–871 | 9 | |
| 872–881 | 4 | |
| 882–891 | 6 | |
| 892–901 | 3 | |
| 902–911 | 6 | |
| 912–921 | 3 | |
| 922–931 | 2 | |
| 932–941 | 2 | |
| 942–951 | 2 | |
| 952–961 | 3 | |
| 962–971 | 3 | |
| 972–981 | 3 | |
| 982–990 | 5 | |
| 991+ | 100 |
The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William A. Arbaugh sits on this spectrum.
This scientist: 41 D-Index — 40th percentile
40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.
The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.
| D-Index | Scientists | This scientist |
|---|---|---|
| 30–31 | 879 | |
| 32–33 | 983 | |
| 34–35 | 918 | |
| 36–37 | 990 | |
| 38–39 | 968 | |
| 40–41 | 907 | 41 |
| 42–43 | 821 | |
| 44–45 | 763 | |
| 46–47 | 689 | |
| 48–49 | 543 | |
| 50–51 | 543 | |
| 52–53 | 518 | |
| 54–55 | 500 | |
| 56–57 | 458 | |
| 58–59 | 400 | |
| 60–61 | 337 | |
| 62–63 | 308 | |
| 64–65 | 292 | |
| 66–67 | 249 | |
| 68–69 | 213 | |
| 70–71 | 192 | |
| 72–73 | 189 | |
| 74–75 | 165 | |
| 76–77 | 139 | |
| 78–79 | 119 | |
| 80–81 | 121 | |
| 82–83 | 113 | |
| 84–85 | 88 | |
| 86–87 | 87 | |
| 88–89 | 75 | |
| 90–91 | 69 | |
| 92–93 | 57 | |
| 94–95 | 46 | |
| 96–97 | 38 | |
| 98–99 | 34 | |
| 100–101 | 36 | |
| 102–103 | 27 | |
| 104–105 | 37 | |
| 106–107 | 18 | |
| 108–109 | 31 | |
| 110–111 | 19 | |
| 112–113 | 16 | |
| 114–115 | 12 | |
| 116–117 | 20 | |
| 118–119 | 15 | |
| 120–121 | 5 | |
| 122–123 | 20 | |
| 124–125 | 8 | |
| 126–127 | 5 | |
| 128–129 | 7 | |
| 130 | 3 | |
| 131+ | 98 |
William A. Arbaugh is affiliated with the University of Maryland, College Park in the United States. Their academic profile and research focus pertain primarily to this institution.
No recent papers, frequent co-authors, publication venues, book publications, main fields or subfields of study, or specific research topics are available in the current data.
There is no information on awards or honors conferred upon William A. Arbaugh.
Based on the information provided, the available data is limited to affiliation details, and no additional specifics about their research contributions or scholarly activities are accessible at this time.
Arunesh Mishra;Minho Shin;William Arbaugh
W.A. Arbaugh;D.J. Farber;J.M. Smith
W.A. Arbaugh;N. Shankar;Y.C.J. Wan;Kan Zhang
Nick L. Petroni;Timothy Fraser;Jesus Molina;William A. Arbaugh
D.S. Alexander;W.A. Arbaugh;M.W. Hicks;P. Kakkar;P. Kakkar
A. Khalili;J. Katz;W.A. Arbaugh
Arunesh Mishra;Suman Banerjee;William Arbaugh
Minho Shin;Arunesh Mishra;William A. Arbaugh
W.A. Arbaugh;W.L. Fithen;J. McHugh
Arunesh Mishra;Vivek Shrivastava;Suman Banerjee;William Arbaugh
A. Mishra;Min Ho Shin;N.L. Petroni;T.C. Clancy
A. Mishra;V. Brik;S. Banerjee;A. Srinivasan
Unknown
Arunesh Mishra;Vladimir Brik;Suman Banerjee;Aravind Srinivasan
Hao Yang;Fan Ye;Yuan Yuan;Songwu Lu
R. Droms;W. Arbaugh
Arunesh Mishra;Eric Rozner;Suman Banerjee;William Arbaugh
Arunesh Mishra;William A. Arbaugh
Nick L. Petroni;Timothy Fraser;AAron Walters;William A. Arbaugh
D.S. Alexander;W.A. Arbaugh;A.D. Keromytis;J.M. Smith
William A. Arbaugh;Narendar Shankar;Y. C. Justin Wan
If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.
With the rise of digital learning, students interested in Computer Science now have a wide variety of online degree options. For those seeking a quicker entry into the tech field, you might consider what is the easiest associate's degree to get, as associate programs can pave the way for entry-level IT jobs or further study.
Cost is an important factor when selecting a degree. Schools like university of north georgia are known for offering affordable online programs, helping students minimize debt while maximizing career opportunity.
To ensure you're receiving quality education, it's smart to explore the best online degree programs that are nationally accredited. Their credentials can enhance your employability and ensure your studies meet industry standards.
For those passionate about gaming and technology, there are flexible options to study from home. You can look into game design schools online and gain specialized skills for the fast-growing video game industry. Whether you pursue programming, design, or development, online programs open diverse career pathways in the digital age.