World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
30
Citations
3528
World Ranking
11386
National Ranking
5946

Tricia M. Leahey publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tricia M. Leahey sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 69 publications — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Tricia M. Leahey D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tricia M. Leahey sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 30 D-Index — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • The Frequency, Nature, and Effects of Naturally Occurring Appearance-Focused Social Comparisons

    Tricia M. Leahey;Janis H. Crowther;Kristin D. Mickelson

  • Weight-loss maintenance in successful weight losers: surgical vs non-surgical methods

    Dale S. Bond;Suzanne Phelan;Tricia M. Leahey;James O. Hill

  • Social Influences Are Associated With BMI and Weight Loss Intentions in Young Adults

    Tricia M. Leahey;Jessica Gokee LaRose;Joseph L. Fava;Rena R. Wing

  • An Ecological Momentary Assessment of the Effects of Weight and Shape Social Comparisons on Women With Eating Pathology, High Body Dissatisfaction, and Low Body Dissatisfaction

    Tricia M. Leahey;Janis H. Crowther;Jeffrey A. Ciesla

  • A Cognitive-Behavioral Mindfulness Group Therapy Intervention for the Treatment of Binge Eating in Bariatric Surgery Patients

    Tricia M. Leahey;Janis H. Crowther;Sharon R. Irwin

  • Differences in motivations and weight loss behaviors in young adults and older adults in the National Weight Control Registry.

    Jessica Gokee LaRose;Tricia M. Leahey;Tricia M. Leahey;James O. Hill;Rena R. Wing;Rena R. Wing

  • An acceptance-based behavioral intervention for weight loss: a pilot study.

    Heather M. Niemeier;Tricia Leahey;Kathleen Palm Reed;Richard A. Brown

  • Failure to Replicate Depletion of Self-Control

    Xiaomeng Xu;Kathryn E. Demos;Kathryn E. Demos;Tricia M. Leahey;Tricia M. Leahey;Chantelle N. Hart

  • A randomized controlled pilot study testing three types of health coaches for obesity treatment: Professional, peer, and mentor†

    Tricia M. Leahey;Rena R. Wing

  • An ecological momentary assessment of comparison target as a moderator of the effects of appearance-focused social comparisons.

    Tricia M. Leahey;Janis H. Crowther

  • Teammates and Social Influence Affect Weight Loss Outcomes in a Team-Based Weight Loss Competition

    Tricia M. Leahey;Rajiv Kumar;Brad M. Weinberg;Rena R. Wing

  • Objective quantification of physical activity in bariatric surgery candidates and normal-weight controls

    Dale S. Bond;John M. Jakicic;Sivamainthan Vithiananthan;J. Graham Thomas

  • An Automated Internet Behavioral Weight Loss Program by Physician Referral: A Randomized, Controlled Trial

    J. Graham Thomas;Tricia M. Leahey;Rena R. Wing

  • Effects of bariatric surgery on food cravings: do food cravings and the consumption of craved foods “normalize” after surgery?

    Tricia M. Leahey;Dale S. Bond;Hollie Raynor;Dean Roye

  • Prevalence and degree of sexual dysfunction in a sample of women seeking bariatric surgery.

    Dale S. Bond;Siva Vithiananthan;Tricia M. Leahey;J. Graham Thomas

  • A randomized trial of an acceptance-based behavioral intervention for weight loss in people with high internal disinhibition.

    Jason Lillis;Heather M. Niemeier;J. Graham Thomas;Jessica Unick

  • The point prevalence of bulimic disorders from 1990 to 2004.

    Janis H. Crowther;Michael Armey;Kristine H. Luce;Ginnie R. Dalton

  • Benefits of adding Small Financial Incentives or Optional Group Meetings to a Web-based Statewide Obesity Initiative

    Tricia M. Leahey;Tricia M. Leahey;Leslee L. Subak;Joseph Fava;Michael Schembri

  • Adding evidence-based behavioral weight loss strategies to a statewide wellness campaign: a randomized clinical trial

    Tricia M. Leahey;J. Graham Thomas;Joseph L. Fava;Leslee L. Subak

  • Ecological momentary assessment of recommended postoperative eating and activity behaviors

    J. Graham Thomas;Dale S. Bond;Beth A. Ryder;Tricia M. Leahey

Frequent Co-Authors

Rena R. Wing
Rena R. Wing Brown University
Janis H. Crowther
Janis H. Crowther Kent State University
Joseph L. Fava
Joseph L. Fava Brown University
James O. Hill
James O. Hill University of Alabama at Birmingham
John Gunstad
John Gunstad Kent State University
Mary Beth Spitznagel
Mary Beth Spitznagel Kent State University
Chantelle N. Hart
Chantelle N. Hart Temple University
John M. Jakicic
John M. Jakicic University of Pittsburgh
Mark A. Espeland
Mark A. Espeland Wake Forest University
Crystal L. Park
Crystal L. Park University of Connecticut

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Tricia M. Leahey

Recently Published Articles