World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Economics and Finance 37 2676 2425 1492 1314 383 6337
Law 37 138 125 107 96 417 6558

Thomas J. Miceli publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Thomas J. Miceli between 1988 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Thomas J. Miceli published across 38 years, from 1988 to 2025, averaging 12.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 38 publications in 2020. 30 of the 471 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1988 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 38. Peak 38 publications in 2020. 1988: 2 publications 1989: 3 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 5 publications 1992: 4 publications 1993: 4 publications 1994: 6 publications 1995: 9 publications 1996: 5 publications 1997: 20 publications 1998: 12 publications 1999: 9 publications 2000: 9 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 14 publications 2003: 11 publications 2004: 15 publications 2005: 12 publications 2006: 9 publications 2007: 14 publications 2008: 14 publications 2009: 12 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 21 publications 2012: 20 publications 2013: 22 publications 2014: 18 publications 2015: 19 publications 2016: 14 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 27 publications 2019: 19 publications 2020: 38 publications 2021: 14 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 11 publications 2024: 18 publications 2025: 12 publications
1988 2025

471 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Thomas J. Miceli: publications per year, 1988 to 2025
Year Publications
1988 2
1989 3
1990 0
1991 5
1992 4
1993 4
1994 6
1995 9
1996 5
1997 20
1998 12
1999 9
2000 9
2001 6
2002 14
2003 11
2004 15
2005 12
2006 9
2007 14
2008 14
2009 12
2010 9
2011 21
2012 20
2013 22
2014 18
2015 19
2016 14
2017 10
2018 27
2019 19
2020 38
2021 14
2022 4
2023 11
2024 18
2025 12
Total 471
Download as CSV

Thomas J. Miceli publications per year - data summary

  • Thomas J. Miceli, a Law scholar from University of Connecticut, has 471 publications recorded across 38 years, from 1988 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1988 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2020, with 38 publications.
  • The least productive year with any output is 1988, with 2 publications.
  • 1 of the 38 years in the span carries no publications at all (1990).
  • The rate of publication averages 12.4 papers per year over the whole span, or 12.7 per year counting only the 37 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 59 publications, 13% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1988-2000: 88 publications (6.8 per year); 2001-2013: 179 publications (13.8 per year); 2014-2025: 204 publications (17.0 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Thomas J. Miceli publication distribution in Law in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Law in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas J. Miceli sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 46 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 37–41 to 262+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 100. Most scientists, 100, have 262+ publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 262 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 262+ publications, is where this scientist sits. 37–41 publications: 3 scientists 42–46 publications: 1 scientist 47–51 publications: 0 scientists 52–56 publications: 3 scientists 57–61 publications: 2 scientists 62–66 publications: 1 scientist 67–71 publications: 6 scientists 72–76 publications: 6 scientists 77–81 publications: 10 scientists 82–86 publications: 7 scientists 87–91 publications: 10 scientists 92–96 publications: 18 scientists 97–101 publications: 15 scientists 102–106 publications: 14 scientists 107–111 publications: 12 scientists 112–116 publications: 12 scientists 117–121 publications: 14 scientists 122–126 publications: 10 scientists 127–131 publications: 9 scientists 132–136 publications: 14 scientists 137–141 publications: 12 scientists 142–146 publications: 14 scientists 147–151 publications: 8 scientists 152–156 publications: 14 scientists 157–161 publications: 5 scientists 162–166 publications: 9 scientists 167–171 publications: 15 scientists 172–176 publications: 6 scientists 177–181 publications: 9 scientists 182–186 publications: 8 scientists 187–191 publications: 16 scientists 192–196 publications: 7 scientists 197–201 publications: 6 scientists 202–206 publications: 7 scientists 207–211 publications: 11 scientists 212–216 publications: 0 scientists 217–221 publications: 5 scientists 222–226 publications: 6 scientists 227–231 publications: 10 scientists 232–236 publications: 8 scientists 237–241 publications: 5 scientists 242–246 publications: 4 scientists 247–251 publications: 2 scientists 252–256 publications: 7 scientists 257–261 publications: 5 scientists 262+ publications: 100 scientists
37–41 publications 262+

This scientist: 417 publications — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 262 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Law scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 466 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
37–41 3
42–46 1
47–51 0
52–56 3
57–61 2
62–66 1
67–71 6
72–76 6
77–81 10
82–86 7
87–91 10
92–96 18
97–101 15
102–106 14
107–111 12
112–116 12
117–121 14
122–126 10
127–131 9
132–136 14
137–141 12
142–146 14
147–151 8
152–156 14
157–161 5
162–166 9
167–171 15
172–176 6
177–181 9
182–186 8
187–191 16
192–196 7
197–201 6
202–206 7
207–211 11
212–216 0
217–221 5
222–226 6
227–231 10
232–236 8
237–241 5
242–246 4
247–251 2
252–256 7
257–261 5
262+ 100 417
Download as CSV

Thomas J. Miceli publication distribution in Law in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 466 Law scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 46 ranges running from 37–41 to 262+ publications.
  • Thomas J. Miceli, a Law scholar from University of Connecticut, records 417 publications - the 94th percentile of the discipline.
  • 94% of ranked Law scientists score the same or lower than Thomas J. Miceli, and about 6% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 167–171 publications range, and Thomas J. Miceli ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 262+ publications, holding 100 scientists (21% of the field).
  • 14% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 92–96 publications), so the field is spread fairly evenly across the scale.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 262 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (21% of the field).

Thomas J. Miceli D-index placement in Law in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Law scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas J. Miceli sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
20 40 60 80
Bar chart with 23 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 20 to 42+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 92. Most scientists, 92, have 42+ D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 42 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 37 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 20 D-Index: 16 scientists 21 D-Index: 23 scientists 22 D-Index: 11 scientists 23 D-Index: 20 scientists 24 D-Index: 17 scientists 25 D-Index: 23 scientists 26 D-Index: 19 scientists 27 D-Index: 19 scientists 28 D-Index: 22 scientists 29 D-Index: 14 scientists 30 D-Index: 25 scientists 31 D-Index: 25 scientists 32 D-Index: 20 scientists 33 D-Index: 24 scientists 34 D-Index: 23 scientists 35 D-Index: 12 scientists 36 D-Index: 11 scientists 37 D-Index: 15 scientists 38 D-Index: 14 scientists 39 D-Index: 4 scientists 40 D-Index: 8 scientists 41 D-Index: 9 scientists 42+ D-Index: 92 scientists
20 D-Index 42+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 42 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Law scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 466 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
20 16
21 23
22 11
23 20
24 17
25 23
26 19
27 19
28 22
29 14
30 25
31 25
32 20
33 24
34 23
35 12
36 11
37 15 37
38 14
39 4
40 8
41 9
42+ 92
Download as CSV

Thomas J. Miceli D-index placement in Law in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 466 Law scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 23 ranges running from 20 to 42+ D-Index.
  • Thomas J. Miceli, a Law scholar from University of Connecticut, records 37 D-Index - the 73rd percentile of the discipline.
  • 73% of ranked Law scientists score the same or lower than Thomas J. Miceli, and about 27% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 31 D-Index range, and Thomas J. Miceli ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 42+ D-Index, holding 92 scientists (20% of the field).
  • 24% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 25 D-Index), so the field is spread fairly evenly across the scale.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 42 D-Index or more, 92 scientists in all (20% of the field).

Overview

Thomas J. Miceli is affiliated with the University of Connecticut in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields including Economics, Econometrics and Finance, as well as Social Sciences. Within these broad domains, their subfields of study include Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science, Law, Safety Research, and Pharmacy.

The researcher's work addresses several main topics, notably:

  • Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems
  • Legal and Constitutional Studies
  • Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
  • Crime Patterns and Interventions
  • Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance
  • Sports Analytics and Performance
  • Legal principles and applications

Thomas J. Miceli's publication record includes recent papers such as:

  • The role of experience in deterring crime: A theory of specific versus general deterrence (2022), Economic Inquiry
  • Counting offenders' gains? Economic and moral considerations in the determination of criminality (2022), European Journal of Law and Economics

Other recent papers coauthored by close collaborators include:

  • Identity, religion, and the state: The origin of theocracy (2020), Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization
  • Religion, rulers, and conflict (2023), Journal of Economic Growth
  • Legislating for profit and optimal Eighth-Amendment review (2021), Economic Inquiry

Frequent co-authors working with Thomas J. Miceli are:

  • Metin M. Coşgel
  • Kathleen Segerson
  • Murat C. Mungan
  • Richard N. Langlois
  • Tim Friehe

Publication venues where this researcher has contributed multiple papers include:

  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • International Journal of Sport Finance
  • Review of Law & Economics
  • Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization
  • International Review of Law and Economics

Thomas J. Miceli has authored books published by Stanford University Press eBooks and Edward Elgar Publishing. These include "The Economic Approach to Law, Third Edition" (2020) and "Topics in Sports Economics" (forthcoming in 2025).

Best Publications

  • Voluntary Environmental Agreements: Good or Bad News for Environmental Protection?

    Kathleen Segerson;Thomas J. Miceli

  • Economics of the Law: Torts, Contracts, Property, Litigation

    Thomas Miceli

  • The Economic Approach to Law

    Thomas J. Miceli

  • Reputation and judicial decision-making

    Thomas J. Miceli;Metin M. Coşgel

  • Regulatory Takings: When Should Compensation Be Paid?

    Thomas J. Miceli;Kathleen Segerson

  • The holdout problem, urban sprawl, and eminent domain

    Thomas J. Miceli;C.F. Sirmans

  • Optimal Prosecution of Defendants Whose Guilt Is Uncertain

    Thomas J. Miceli

  • A Bargaining Model of Holdouts and Takings

    Thomas J. Miceli;Kathleen Segerson

  • Job Rotation: Cost, Benefits, and Stylized Facts

    Metin M. Cosgel;Thomas J. Miceli

  • Do Owners Take Better Care of Their Housing Than Renters

    John Harding;Thomas J. Miceli;C.F. Sirmans

  • Optimal criminal procedure: Fairness and deterrence

    Thomas J. Miceli

  • Voluntary Approaches to Environmental Protection: The Role of Legislative Threats

    Kathleen Segerson;Thomas J. Miceli

  • The Optimal Duration of Real Estate Listing Contracts

    Thomas J. Miceli

  • An economic theory of adverse possession

    Thomas J. Miceli;C.F. Sirmans

  • Contingent Fees for Lawyers: The Impact on Litigation and Accident Prevention

    Thomas J. Miceli;Kathleen Segerson

  • Contracting with spatial externalities and agency problems The case of retail leases

    Thomas J. Miceli;C.F. Sirmans

  • An Experimental Analysis of the Impact of Intermediaries on the Outcome of Bargaining Games

    Abdullah Yavas;Thomas J. Miceli;C.F. Sirmans

  • State and religion

    Metin Coşgel;Thomas J. Miceli

  • State and Religion

    Metin Cosgel;Thomas Miceli

  • The political economy of mass printing: Legitimacy and technological change in the Ottoman Empire

    Metin M. Coşgel;Thomas J. Miceli;Jared Rubin

  • Economics of The Law

    Unknown

  • A Simple Theory of Increasing Penalties for Repeat Offenders

    Thomas J. Miceli;Catherine Bucci

  • Plea bargaining and deterrence: An institutional approach

    Thomas J. Miceli

  • Land Inheritance Rules: Theory and Cross- Cultural Analysis

    Matthew Baker;Thomas J. Miceli

  • Do Contingent Fees Promote Excessive Litigation

    Thomas J. Miceli

  • Title Systems and Land Values

    Thomas J. Miceli;Henry J. Munneke;C. F. Sirmans;Geoffrey K. Turnbull

  • Joint liability in torts: Marginal and infra-marginal efficiency

    Thomas J. Miceli;Kathleen Segerson

  • The Dynamic Effects of Land Title Systems

    Thomas J. Miceli;C.F. Sirmans;Geoffrey K. Turnbull

  • Reverse Mortgages and Borrower Maintenance Risk

    Thomas J. Miceli;C.F. Sirmans

  • Is the Compensation Model for Real Estate Brokers Obsolete

    Thomas J. Miceli;Katherine A. Pancak;C. F. Sirmans

  • Tax Collection in History

    Metin M. Coşgel;Thomas J. Miceli

Frequent Co-Authors

C. F. Sirmans
C. F. Sirmans Florida State University
Kathleen Segerson
Kathleen Segerson University of Connecticut
Geoffrey K. Turnbull
Geoffrey K. Turnbull University of Central Florida
Brad R. Humphreys
Brad R. Humphreys West Virginia University
Dhammika Dharmapala
Dhammika Dharmapala University of California, Berkeley
Richard N. Langlois
Richard N. Langlois University of Connecticut
J. Vernon Henderson
J. Vernon Henderson London School of Economics and Political Science
Abdullah Yavas
Abdullah Yavas University of Wisconsin–Madison

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring alternative or complementary online degrees can significantly benefit students interested in Law and legal careers. Many fields intersect with legal studies, providing valuable skills that can enhance career prospects in compliance, corporate governance, or management roles.

For example, a masters in organizational leadership develops skills in team management, ethics, and strategic decision-making—crucial for leadership roles in both legal and corporate settings. Similarly, mba programs in operations management offer a strong grounding in process optimization and resource management, which align well with legal careers focused on regulatory compliance or risk management.

Flexible options like an online mba no gre make graduate education accessible for those who want to advance without standardized test barriers. Budget-conscious students may also consider the best online mba under 30k, offering an affordable avenue for expanding your expertise beyond the legal field.

These programs can open doors to diverse career pathways where law and business intersect, providing more options in today’s dynamic job market.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas J. Miceli

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles