World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Genetics

D-Index
42
Citations
4961
World Ranking
4318
National Ranking
1863

Thomas D. Sargent publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas D. Sargent sits on this spectrum.

45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45 publications 703+

This scientist: 62 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

Thomas D. Sargent D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas D. Sargent sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

Overview

Thomas D. Sargent is affiliated with the National Institutes of Health in the United States. Their professional work is connected to a significant institution known for biomedical and health-related research.

There are no listed publications available to detail specific research papers or articles authored by this scientist. Consequently, the exact topics or themes explored within their published work cannot be specified.

Information about recurring collaboration patterns is not provided, so the network of frequent coauthors remains unknown. Similarly, data regarding publication venues, including journals or conferences where their work has appeared, is not available.

Details on the scientist's main fields of study, subfields, or primary research topics have also not been supplied. Without this, it is not possible to describe the specific scientific disciplines or areas of expertise they have contributed to.

No book publications linked to Thomas D. Sargent have been identified, and there are no records of awards or honours associated with their research career.

The available data confirms that Thomas D. Sargent is currently living. This status suggests ongoing opportunities for future work and contributions to their field.

Best Publications

  • Differential gene expression in the gastrula of Xenopus laevis

    Thomas D. Sargent;Igor B. Dawid

  • Epidermal keratin gene expressed in embryos of Xenopus laevis.

    Erzsebet Jonas;Thomas D. Sargent;Igor B. Dawid

  • Cell interactions and the control of gene activity during early development of Xenopus laevis

    Thomas D. Sargent;Milan Jamrich;Igor B. Dawid

  • Induction of neural crest in Xenopus by transcription factor AP2α

    Ting Luo;Young Hoon Lee;Jean Pierre Saint-Jeannet;Thomas D. Sargent

  • Inhibitory patterning of the anterior neural plate in Xenopus by homeodomain factors Dlx3 and Msx1.

    Jules A Feledy;Maureen J Beanan;John J Sandoval;Jennifer S Goodrich

  • Development of neural inducing capacity in dissociated Xenopus embryos.

    Sheryl M. Sato;Thomas D. Sargent

  • Accumulation and decay of DG42 gene products follow a gradient pattern during Xenopus embryogenesis.

    Frédéric Rosa;Thomas D. Sargent;Martha L. Rebbert;George S. Michaels

  • Differential regulation of Dlx gene expression by a BMP morphogenetic gradient.

    Ting Luo;Mami Matsuo-Takasaki;Jae H. Lim;Thomas D. Sargent

  • Regulation and function of Dlx3 in vertebrate development.

    Maureen J. Beanan;Thomas D. Sargent

  • Transcription Factor AP-2 Is an Essential and Direct Regulator of Epidermal Development in Xenopus

    Ting Luo;Mami Matsuo-Takasaki;Megan L. Thomas;Daniel L. Weeks

  • Transcription factor AP-2 is tissue-specific in Xenopus and is closely related or identical to keratin transcription factor 1 (KTF-1).

    A.M. Snape;R.S. Winning;T.D. Sargent

  • A Xenopus distal-less gene in transgenic mice: conserved regulation in distal limb epidermis and other sites of epithelial-mesenchymal interaction

    Maria I. Morasso;Kathleen A. Mahon;Thomas D. Sargent

  • Differential expression of a Distal-less homeobox gene Xdll-2 in ectodermal cell lineages.

    Marie-Luise Dirksen;Maria I. Morasso;Thomas D. Sargent;Milan Jamrich

  • Distinct roles for Distal-less genes Dlx3 and Dlx5 in regulating ectodermal development in Xenopus.

    Ting Luo;Mami Matsuo-Takasaki;Thomas D. Sargent

  • Disruption of Cell Adhesion inXenopusEmbryos by Pagliaccio, an Eph-Class Receptor Tyrosine Kinase

    Robert S. Winning;Jon B. Scales;Thomas D. Sargent

  • Cell-type-specific expression of epidermal cytokeratin genes during gastrulation of Xenopus laevis.

    M Jamrich;T D Sargent;I B Dawid

  • Transcriptional regulation of a Xenopus embryonic epidermal keratin gene.

    E.A. Jonas;A.M. Snape;T.D. Sargent

  • Localized and inducible expression of Xenopus-posterior (Xpo), a novel gene active in early frog embryos, encoding a protein with a ‘CCHC’ finger domain

    S.M. Sato;T.D. Sargent

  • Specification of the otic placode depends on Sox9 function in Xenopus.

    Natasha Saint-Germain;Young Hoon Lee;Yanhui Zhang;Thomas D. Sargent

  • Molecular cloning of Xenopus hatching enzyme and its specific expression in hatching gland cells.

    Chiaki Katagiri;Ryu Maeda;Chiaki Yamashika;Koichi Mita

Frequent Co-Authors

Igor B. Dawid
Igor B. Dawid National Institutes of Health
Justin R. Fallon
Justin R. Fallon Brown University
Trevor Williams
Trevor Williams Texas A&M University
Thomas F. Schilling
Thomas F. Schilling University of California, Irvine
Maria I. Morasso
Maria I. Morasso National Institutes of Health
Ken W.Y. Cho
Ken W.Y. Cho University of California, Irvine
Guillermo Oliver
Guillermo Oliver Northwestern University
Bradley A. Carlson
Bradley A. Carlson National Institutes of Health
Dolph L. Hatfield
Dolph L. Hatfield National Institutes of Health
Milan Jamrich
Milan Jamrich Baylor College of Medicine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring genetics in the USA can open doors to a range of healthcare and science careers. Whether you seek hands-on patient care or leadership in health systems, there are flexible, online degree options that complement a background in genetics.

For those drawn to nursing, consider nursing programs without TEAS requirements, which streamline the admissions process for future nurses. If you're aiming for rapid entry into the profession, a 6 month LPN program online can help you start working in less than a year.

Genetics graduates interested in management may pursue affordable online MHA programs, preparing for leadership roles in health organizations. Ambitious nurses can advance their research and teaching capabilities by enrolling in a PhD in nursing.

These options offer pathways for genetics graduates to tailor their education and careers to evolving interests across health and science fields—often with the flexibility and accessibility of online learning.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas D. Sargent

Recently Published Articles