World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Social Sciences and Humanities
Singapore
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 58 1615 1446 4 4 115 21871

Teck-Hua Ho publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Teck-Hua Ho between 1989 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Teck-Hua Ho published across 37 years, from 1989 to 2025, averaging 3.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 8 publications in 2010. 3 of the 124 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1989 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 8. Peak 8 publications in 2010. 1989: 1 publication 1990: 0 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 6 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 4 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 7 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 6 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 1 publication 2014: 1 publication 2015: 6 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 2 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 0 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 2 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 1 publication 2024: 2 publications 2025: 1 publication
1989 2025

124 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Teck-Hua Ho: publications per year, 1989 to 2025
Year Publications
1989 1
1990 0
1991 1
1992 0
1993 0
1994 6
1995 0
1996 4
1997 3
1998 7
1999 3
2000 1
2001 6
2002 5
2003 5
2004 7
2005 6
2006 3
2007 4
2008 6
2009 6
2010 8
2011 2
2012 7
2013 1
2014 1
2015 6
2016 5
2017 2
2018 5
2019 0
2020 4
2021 2
2022 3
2023 1
2024 2
2025 1
Total 124
Download as CSV

Teck-Hua Ho publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Teck-Hua Ho sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 114–123 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 115 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474 115
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Teck-Hua Ho D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Teck-Hua Ho sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 58 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95 58
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Social Sciences and Humanities in Singapore Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Social Sciences and Humanities in Singapore Leader Award

Overview

Teck-Hua Ho is affiliated with Nanyang Technological University in Singapore, focusing on research primarily within the field of Computer Science. Their work spans several interconnected subfields, including Artificial Intelligence, Management Science and Operations Research, Epidemiology, Safety Research, and Applied Psychology.

The primary research topics covered by their publications include Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies, Influenza Virus Research Studies, Behavioral Health and Interventions, Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy, SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research, Survey Methodology and Nonresponse, and Auction Theory and Applications.

Recent published papers have appeared in notable venues, indicating a breadth of disciplinary engagement:

  • Assessing the impact of novelty and conformity on hesitancy towards COVID-19 vaccines using mRNA technology, 2022, Communications Medicine
  • Redefine statistical significance, 2025, UNC Libraries
  • R2-B2: Recursive Reasoning-Based Bayesian Optimization for No-Regret Learning in Games, 2020, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • A Bayesian Level-k Model in n-Person Games, 2020, Management Science
  • Examining the replicability of online experiments selected by a decision market, 2024, Nature Human Behaviour

Frequent co-authorship relationships provide insight into collaborative networks in their field. They have consistently worked with the following researchers:

  • Ching Leong
  • Lawrence Jin
  • Dayoung Kim
  • Jeongbin Kim
  • Magnus Johannesson

Publication venues where Teck-Hua Ho's work has appeared multiple times include:

  • Behavioural Public Policy
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Communications Medicine
  • Nature Human Behaviour
  • UNC Libraries

The diversity in publication venues and research topics reflects an interdisciplinary approach combining elements of computer science techniques with practical applications in epidemiology and behavioral health.

Best Publications

  • Redefine statistical significance

    Daniel J. Benjamin;James O. Berger;Magnus Johannesson;Magnus Johannesson;Brian A. Nosek;Brian A. Nosek

  • Experience‐weighted Attraction Learning in Normal Form Games

    Colin F. Camerer;Teck Hua Ho

  • A Cognitive Hierarchy Model of Games

    Colin F. Camerer;Teck-Hua Ho;Juin-Kuan Chong

  • Evaluating the replicability of social science experiments in Nature and Science between 2010 and 2015

    Colin F. Camerer;Anna Dreber;Felix Holzmeister;Teck-Hua Ho

  • Violations of the betweenness axiom and nonlinearity in probability

    Colin F. Camerer;Teck-Hua Ho

  • Determining where to shop: Fixed and variable costs of shopping

    David R. Bell;Teck-Hua Ho;Christopher S. Tang

  • New Product Development: The Performance and Time-To-Market Tradeoff

    Morris A. Cohen;Jehoshua Eliashberg;Teck-Hua Ho

  • Iterated Dominance and Iterated Best-Response in Experimental P-Beauty Contests

    Teck-Hua Ho;Colin F. Camerer;Keith Weigelt

  • Sophisticated Experience-Weighted Attraction Learning and Strategic Teaching in Repeated Games

    Colin F. Camerer;Teck-Hua Ho;Juin-Kuan Chong

  • Culture: a fourth dimension of group support systems

    Richard T. Watson;Teck Hua Ho;K. S. Raman

  • Designing Pricing Contracts for Boundedly Rational Customers: Does the Framing of the Fixed Fee Matter?

    Unknown

  • Modeling the Psychology of Consumer and Firm Behavior with Behavioral Economics

    Teck H. Ho;Noah Lim;Colin F. Camerer

  • Behavioural Game Theory: Thinking, Learning and Teaching

    Colin F. Camerer;Teck-Hua Ho;Juin Kuan Chong

  • Distributional and Peer‐Induced Fairness in Supply Chain Contract Design

    Unknown

  • Reference Dependence in Multilocation Newsvendor Models: A Structural Analysis

    Teck Hua Ho;Noah Lim;Tony Haitao Cui

  • Self-tuning experience weighted attraction learning in games

    Teck-Hua Ho;Colin F. Camerer;Juin-Kuan Chong;Juin-Kuan Chong

  • Managing Demand and Sales Dynamics in New Product Diffusion Under Supply Constraint

    Teck-Hua Ho;Sergei Savin;Christian Terwiesch

  • Initial Public Offerings as Lotteries: Skewness Preference and First-Day Returns

    T. Clifton Green;Byoung-Hyoun Hwang

  • Store Choice and Shopping Behavior: How Price Format Works

    Christopher S. Tang;David R. Bell;Teck-Hua Ho

  • Information Sharing in a Long-Term Supply Chain Relationship: The Role of Customer Review Strategy

    Z. Justin Ren;Morris A. Cohen;Teck H. Ho;Christian Terwiesch

  • Rational shopping behavior and the option value of variable pricing

    Teck-Hua Ho;Christopher S. Tang;David R. Bell

  • Designing Price Contracts for Boundedly Rational Customers: Does the Number of Blocks Matter?

    Noah Lim;Teck-Hua Ho

  • Measuring Imputed Cost in the Semiconductor Equipment Supply Chain

    Morris A. Cohen;Teck H. Ho;Z. Justin Ren;Christian Terwiesch

  • An Empirical Analysis of Forecast Sharing in the Semiconductor Equipment Supply Chain

    Christian Terwiesch;Z. Justin Ren;Teck H. Ho;Morris A. Cohen

  • Knowledge Market Design: A Field Experiment at Google Answers ⁄

    Yan Chen;Teck‐Hua Ho;Yong‐Mi Kim

  • Product variety management : research advances

    Teck-Hua Ho;Christopher S. Tang

  • Setting Customer Expectation in Service Delivery: An Integrated Marketing-Operations Perspective

    Teck H. Ho;Yu-Sheng Zheng

Frequent Co-Authors

Colin F. Camerer
Colin F. Camerer California Institute of Technology
Morris A. Cohen
Morris A. Cohen University of Pennsylvania
Christopher S. Tang
Christopher S. Tang University of California, Los Angeles
Brian A. Nosek
Brian A. Nosek Center for Open Science
Christian Terwiesch
Christian Terwiesch University of Pennsylvania
Magnus Johannesson
Magnus Johannesson Stockholm School of Economics
Michael Kirchler
Michael Kirchler University of Innsbruck
Jehoshua Eliashberg
Jehoshua Eliashberg University of Pennsylvania
David Bell
David Bell University of Leeds
Anna Dreber
Anna Dreber Stockholm School of Economics

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in Social Sciences and Humanities opens up a range of flexible and affordable options for students worldwide. Many universities offer programs like affordable online msw programs, making advanced education in social work accessible without high tuition costs or relocation.

For those interested in psychology or behavioral sciences, there are bcba accredited programs online. These pathways prepare students for certification as Board Certified Behavior Analysts, supporting meaningful career roles in mental health, education, and therapy.

Accelerated options like 1 year msw programs online are designed for motivated learners eager to fast-track their career while balancing existing commitments. Similarly, students wanting to delve into mental health and counseling may consider an accelerated bachelor's degree psychology for a quicker route to professional roles or advanced studies.

Choosing the right online program is vital—accreditation, affordability, and flexibility should guide your decision as you prepare for rewarding careers in human services, research, or community leadership.

Best Scientists Citing Teck-Hua Ho

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles