World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Rosemarie Nagel

Rosemarie Nagel

D-Index & Metrics

Economics and Finance

D-Index
30
Citations
7476
World Ranking
3665
National Ranking
51

Rosemarie Nagel publication distribution in Economics and Finance in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Economics and Finance in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rosemarie Nagel sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 1 scientists 47–51 publications: 12 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 23 scientists 62–66 publications: 32 scientists 67–71 publications: 36 scientists 72–76 publications: 56 scientists 77–81 publications: 57 scientists 82–86 publications: 70 scientists 87–91 publications: 86 scientists 92–96 publications: 72 scientists 97–101 publications: 106 scientists 102–106 publications: 97 scientists 107–111 publications: 96 scientists 112–116 publications: 101 scientists 117–121 publications: 103 scientists 122–126 publications: 102 scientists 127–131 publications: 108 scientists 132–136 publications: 107 scientists 137–141 publications: 111 scientists 142–146 publications: 94 scientists 147–151 publications: 96 scientists 152–156 publications: 100 scientists 157–161 publications: 74 scientists 162–166 publications: 68 scientists 167–171 publications: 91 scientists 172–176 publications: 76 scientists 177–181 publications: 75 scientists 182–186 publications: 61 scientists 187–191 publications: 66 scientists 192–196 publications: 68 scientists 197–201 publications: 71 scientists 202–206 publications: 60 scientists 207–211 publications: 56 scientists 212–216 publications: 44 scientists 217–221 publications: 51 scientists 222–226 publications: 65 scientists 227–231 publications: 48 scientists 232–236 publications: 59 scientists 237–241 publications: 37 scientists 242–246 publications: 37 scientists 247–251 publications: 41 scientists 252–256 publications: 43 scientists 257–261 publications: 33 scientists 262–266 publications: 34 scientists 267–271 publications: 39 scientists 272–276 publications: 25 scientists 277–281 publications: 29 scientists 282–286 publications: 29 scientists 287–291 publications: 26 scientists 292–296 publications: 31 scientists 297–301 publications: 31 scientists 302–306 publications: 24 scientists 307–311 publications: 28 scientists 312–316 publications: 24 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 14 scientists 327–331 publications: 25 scientists 332–336 publications: 18 scientists 337–341 publications: 16 scientists 342–346 publications: 18 scientists 347–351 publications: 15 scientists 352–356 publications: 17 scientists 357–361 publications: 19 scientists 362–366 publications: 16 scientists 367–371 publications: 17 scientists 372–376 publications: 7 scientists 377–381 publications: 18 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 19 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 13 scientists 407–411 publications: 13 scientists 412–416 publications: 5 scientists 417–421 publications: 10 scientists 422–426 publications: 6 scientists 427–431 publications: 12 scientists 432–436 publications: 9 scientists 437–441 publications: 9 scientists 442–446 publications: 10 scientists 447–451 publications: 12 scientists 452–456 publications: 8 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 5 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 7 scientists 487–491 publications: 8 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 4 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 7 scientists 517–520 publications: 7 scientists 521+ publications: 99 scientists
42 publications 521+

This scientist: 85 publications — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 521 publications or more.

Rosemarie Nagel D-index placement in Economics and Finance in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Economics and Finance scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rosemarie Nagel sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 126 scientists 31 D-Index: 147 scientists 32 D-Index: 157 scientists 33 D-Index: 178 scientists 34 D-Index: 171 scientists 35 D-Index: 141 scientists 36 D-Index: 132 scientists 37 D-Index: 129 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 120 scientists 40 D-Index: 117 scientists 41 D-Index: 113 scientists 42 D-Index: 114 scientists 43 D-Index: 97 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 86 scientists 46 D-Index: 78 scientists 47 D-Index: 83 scientists 48 D-Index: 62 scientists 49 D-Index: 74 scientists 50 D-Index: 50 scientists 51 D-Index: 66 scientists 52 D-Index: 69 scientists 53 D-Index: 55 scientists 54 D-Index: 67 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 62 scientists 57 D-Index: 45 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 47 scientists 60 D-Index: 46 scientists 61 D-Index: 36 scientists 62 D-Index: 37 scientists 63 D-Index: 56 scientists 64 D-Index: 50 scientists 65 D-Index: 32 scientists 66 D-Index: 28 scientists 67 D-Index: 30 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 25 scientists 70 D-Index: 22 scientists 71 D-Index: 21 scientists 72 D-Index: 26 scientists 73 D-Index: 24 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 12 scientists 76 D-Index: 14 scientists 77 D-Index: 15 scientists 78 D-Index: 15 scientists 79 D-Index: 17 scientists 80 D-Index: 17 scientists 81 D-Index: 11 scientists 82 D-Index: 10 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 11 scientists 85 D-Index: 5 scientists 86 D-Index: 9 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 9 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 6 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 8 scientists 93 D-Index: 10 scientists 94 D-Index: 11 scientists 95 D-Index: 6 scientists 96 D-Index: 4 scientists 97 D-Index: 4 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100 D-Index: 8 scientists 101+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 101+

This scientist: 30 D-Index — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 101 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Unraveling in Guessing Games: An Experimental Study

    Rosemarie Nagel

  • Search Dynamics in Consumer Choice under Time Pressure: An Eye-Tracking Study

    Elena Reutskaja;Rosemarie Nagel;Colin F. Camerer;Antonio Rangel

  • Neural correlates of depth of strategic reasoning in medial prefrontal cortex

    Giorgio Coricelli;Rosemarie Nagel

  • One, Two, (Three), Infinity, ...: Newspaper and Lab Beauty-Contest Experiments

    Antoni Bosch-Domènech;José G. Montalvo;Rosemarie Nagel;Albert Satorra

  • The effect of intergroup competition on group coordination: an experimental study ✩

    Gary Bornstein;Uri Gneezy;Rosemarie Nagel

  • Experimental results on ultimatum games with incomplete information

    Michael Mitzkewitz;Rosemarie Nagel

  • Measuring Strategic Uncertainty in Coordination Games

    Frank Heinemann;Rosemarie Nagel;Peter Ockenfels

  • THE THEORY OF GLOBAL GAMES ON TEST: EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF COORDINATION GAMES WITH PUBLIC AND PRIVATE INFORMATION

    Frank Heinemann;Rosemarie Nagel;Peter Ockenfels

  • ON THE ROBUSTNESS OF BEHAVIOUR IN EXPERIMENTAL ‘BEAUTY CONTEST’ GAMES*

    John Duffy;Rosemarie Nagel

  • Experimental results on the centipede game in normal form: an investigation on learning

    Rosemarie Nagel;Fang Fang Tang

  • Strategic Intelligence: The Cognitive Capability to Anticipate Competitor Behavior

    Sheen S. Levine;Mark Bernard;Rosemarie Nagel

  • The control of game form recognition in experiments: understanding dominant strategy failures in a simple two person “guessing” game

    Eileen Chou;Margaret McConnell;Rosemarie Nagel;Charles R. Plott

  • The two-person beauty contest

    Brit Grosskopf;Rosemarie Nagel

  • Equilibrium selection through incomplete information in coordination games: an experimental study

    Antonio Cabrales;Rosemarie Nagel;Roc Armenter

  • Naive learning and cooperation in network experiments

    Oliver Kirchkamp;Rosemarie Nagel

  • How Werner Güth's ultimatum game shaped our understanding of social behavior☆

    Eric E. van Damme;Ken K.G. Binmore;A.E. A.E. Roth;Larry L. Samuelson

  • Price floors and competition

    Martin Dufwenberg;Uri Gneezy;Jacob K. Goeree;Rosemarie Nagel

  • A survey of experimental guessing games: A study of bounded rationality and learning

    R. Nagel

  • One, Two, (Three), Infinity: Newspaper and Lab Beauty-Contest Experiments

    Rosemarie Nagel;Antoni Bosch i Domènech;Albert Satorra;José García Montalvo

  • Experimental Results on Interactive Competitive Guessing

    Rosemarie Nagel

Frequent Co-Authors

Albert Satorra
Albert Satorra Pompeu Fabra University
Uri Gneezy
Uri Gneezy University of California, San Diego
Pierpaolo Battigalli
Pierpaolo Battigalli Bocconi University
Jacob K. Goeree
Jacob K. Goeree University of New South Wales
Gary Bornstein
Gary Bornstein Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Martin Dufwenberg
Martin Dufwenberg University of Arizona
Colin F. Camerer
Colin F. Camerer California Institute of Technology
Charles R. Plott
Charles R. Plott California Institute of Technology
Antonio Rangel
Antonio Rangel California Institute of Technology
Alan G. Sanfey
Alan G. Sanfey Radboud University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Rosemarie Nagel

Recently Published Articles