| Discipline name | D-Index | World Ranking | Current World Ranking | National Ranking | Current National Ranking | Publications | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Economics and Finance | 30 | 3665 | 3341 | 51 | 51 | 85 | 7476 |
The chart shows the history of publications by Rosemarie Nagel between 1993 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Rosemarie Nagel published across 33 years, from 1993 to 2025, averaging 3.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 8 publications in 2007. 4 of the 105 publications appeared in the last two years.
105 publications in total across all disciplines
| Year | Publications |
|---|---|
| 1993 | 2 |
| 1994 | 1 |
| 1995 | 0 |
| 1996 | 0 |
| 1997 | 2 |
| 1998 | 1 |
| 1999 | 5 |
| 2000 | 3 |
| 2001 | 4 |
| 2002 | 6 |
| 2003 | 1 |
| 2004 | 5 |
| 2005 | 3 |
| 2006 | 3 |
| 2007 | 8 |
| 2008 | 8 |
| 2009 | 4 |
| 2010 | 7 |
| 2011 | 3 |
| 2012 | 6 |
| 2013 | 4 |
| 2014 | 1 |
| 2015 | 3 |
| 2016 | 4 |
| 2017 | 5 |
| 2018 | 6 |
| 2019 | 3 |
| 2020 | 1 |
| 2021 | 1 |
| 2022 | 0 |
| 2023 | 1 |
| 2024 | 1 |
| 2025 | 3 |
| Total | 105 |
The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Economics and Finance in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rosemarie Nagel sits on this spectrum.
This scientist: 85 publications — 8th percentile
8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.
The last bar groups every scientist with 521 publications or more.
| Publications | Scientists | This scientist |
|---|---|---|
| 42–46 | 1 | |
| 47–51 | 12 | |
| 52–56 | 7 | |
| 57–61 | 23 | |
| 62–66 | 32 | |
| 67–71 | 36 | |
| 72–76 | 56 | |
| 77–81 | 57 | |
| 82–86 | 70 | 85 |
| 87–91 | 86 | |
| 92–96 | 72 | |
| 97–101 | 106 | |
| 102–106 | 97 | |
| 107–111 | 96 | |
| 112–116 | 101 | |
| 117–121 | 103 | |
| 122–126 | 102 | |
| 127–131 | 108 | |
| 132–136 | 107 | |
| 137–141 | 111 | |
| 142–146 | 94 | |
| 147–151 | 96 | |
| 152–156 | 100 | |
| 157–161 | 74 | |
| 162–166 | 68 | |
| 167–171 | 91 | |
| 172–176 | 76 | |
| 177–181 | 75 | |
| 182–186 | 61 | |
| 187–191 | 66 | |
| 192–196 | 68 | |
| 197–201 | 71 | |
| 202–206 | 60 | |
| 207–211 | 56 | |
| 212–216 | 44 | |
| 217–221 | 51 | |
| 222–226 | 65 | |
| 227–231 | 48 | |
| 232–236 | 59 | |
| 237–241 | 37 | |
| 242–246 | 37 | |
| 247–251 | 41 | |
| 252–256 | 43 | |
| 257–261 | 33 | |
| 262–266 | 34 | |
| 267–271 | 39 | |
| 272–276 | 25 | |
| 277–281 | 29 | |
| 282–286 | 29 | |
| 287–291 | 26 | |
| 292–296 | 31 | |
| 297–301 | 31 | |
| 302–306 | 24 | |
| 307–311 | 28 | |
| 312–316 | 24 | |
| 317–321 | 13 | |
| 322–326 | 14 | |
| 327–331 | 25 | |
| 332–336 | 18 | |
| 337–341 | 16 | |
| 342–346 | 18 | |
| 347–351 | 15 | |
| 352–356 | 17 | |
| 357–361 | 19 | |
| 362–366 | 16 | |
| 367–371 | 17 | |
| 372–376 | 7 | |
| 377–381 | 18 | |
| 382–386 | 13 | |
| 387–391 | 19 | |
| 392–396 | 9 | |
| 397–401 | 10 | |
| 402–406 | 13 | |
| 407–411 | 13 | |
| 412–416 | 5 | |
| 417–421 | 10 | |
| 422–426 | 6 | |
| 427–431 | 12 | |
| 432–436 | 9 | |
| 437–441 | 9 | |
| 442–446 | 10 | |
| 447–451 | 12 | |
| 452–456 | 8 | |
| 457–461 | 4 | |
| 462–466 | 7 | |
| 467–471 | 4 | |
| 472–476 | 5 | |
| 477–481 | 6 | |
| 482–486 | 7 | |
| 487–491 | 8 | |
| 492–496 | 5 | |
| 497–501 | 4 | |
| 502–506 | 4 | |
| 507–511 | 5 | |
| 512–516 | 7 | |
| 517–520 | 7 | |
| 521+ | 99 |
The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Economics and Finance scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rosemarie Nagel sits on this spectrum.
This scientist: 30 D-Index — 3rd percentile
3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.
The last bar groups every scientist with 101 D-Index or more.
| D-Index | Scientists | This scientist |
|---|---|---|
| 30 | 126 | 30 |
| 31 | 147 | |
| 32 | 157 | |
| 33 | 178 | |
| 34 | 171 | |
| 35 | 141 | |
| 36 | 132 | |
| 37 | 129 | |
| 38 | 130 | |
| 39 | 120 | |
| 40 | 117 | |
| 41 | 113 | |
| 42 | 114 | |
| 43 | 97 | |
| 44 | 115 | |
| 45 | 86 | |
| 46 | 78 | |
| 47 | 83 | |
| 48 | 62 | |
| 49 | 74 | |
| 50 | 50 | |
| 51 | 66 | |
| 52 | 69 | |
| 53 | 55 | |
| 54 | 67 | |
| 55 | 61 | |
| 56 | 62 | |
| 57 | 45 | |
| 58 | 34 | |
| 59 | 47 | |
| 60 | 46 | |
| 61 | 36 | |
| 62 | 37 | |
| 63 | 56 | |
| 64 | 50 | |
| 65 | 32 | |
| 66 | 28 | |
| 67 | 30 | |
| 68 | 24 | |
| 69 | 25 | |
| 70 | 22 | |
| 71 | 21 | |
| 72 | 26 | |
| 73 | 24 | |
| 74 | 23 | |
| 75 | 12 | |
| 76 | 14 | |
| 77 | 15 | |
| 78 | 15 | |
| 79 | 17 | |
| 80 | 17 | |
| 81 | 11 | |
| 82 | 10 | |
| 83 | 16 | |
| 84 | 11 | |
| 85 | 5 | |
| 86 | 9 | |
| 87 | 13 | |
| 88 | 9 | |
| 89 | 7 | |
| 90 | 6 | |
| 91 | 4 | |
| 92 | 8 | |
| 93 | 10 | |
| 94 | 11 | |
| 95 | 6 | |
| 96 | 4 | |
| 97 | 4 | |
| 98 | 6 | |
| 99 | 6 | |
| 100 | 8 | |
| 101+ | 100 |
Rosemarie Nagel
Elena Reutskaja;Rosemarie Nagel;Colin F. Camerer;Antonio Rangel
Giorgio Coricelli;Rosemarie Nagel
Antoni Bosch-Domènech;José G. Montalvo;Rosemarie Nagel;Albert Satorra
Gary Bornstein;Uri Gneezy;Rosemarie Nagel
Michael Mitzkewitz;Rosemarie Nagel
Frank Heinemann;Rosemarie Nagel;Peter Ockenfels
Frank Heinemann;Rosemarie Nagel;Peter Ockenfels
John Duffy;Rosemarie Nagel
Rosemarie Nagel;Fang Fang Tang
Sheen S. Levine;Mark Bernard;Rosemarie Nagel
Eileen Chou;Margaret McConnell;Rosemarie Nagel;Charles R. Plott
Brit Grosskopf;Rosemarie Nagel
Antonio Cabrales;Rosemarie Nagel;Roc Armenter
Oliver Kirchkamp;Rosemarie Nagel
Eric E. van Damme;Ken K.G. Binmore;A.E. A.E. Roth;Larry L. Samuelson
Martin Dufwenberg;Uri Gneezy;Jacob K. Goeree;Rosemarie Nagel
R. Nagel
Rosemarie Nagel;Antoni Bosch i Domènech;Albert Satorra;José García Montalvo
Rosemarie Nagel
If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.
