World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mathematics

D-Index
32
Citations
7117
World Ranking
3120
National Ranking
127

Steven J. Ruuth publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Steven J. Ruuth sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 83 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientists 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientists 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientists 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42 publications 537+

This scientist: 78 publications — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

Steven J. Ruuth D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Steven J. Ruuth sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 138 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

Overview

Steven J. Ruuth is affiliated with Simon Fraser University in Canada and conducts research primarily within the field of Engineering. Their scholarly work spans various subfields, including Computational Mechanics, Mechanics of Materials, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Numerical Analysis, and Computational Theory and Mathematics.

Their research addresses several advanced topics, such as:

  • Advanced Numerical Methods in Computational Mathematics
  • Numerical methods in engineering
  • Electromagnetic Simulation and Numerical Methods
  • Numerical methods for differential equations
  • Advanced Numerical Analysis Techniques
  • Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics
  • Matrix Theory and Algorithms

Ruuth has contributed numerous publications to diverse scientific venues, with frequent appearances in:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Journal of Scientific Computing
  • SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing
  • Numerical Algorithms
  • Journal of Computational Physics

Among recent papers authored or co-authored by Ruuth are:

  • "Meshfree Semi-Lagrangian Methods for Solving Surface Advection PDEs," 2022, Journal of Scientific Computing
  • "Boundary treatment of high order Runge-Kutta methods for hyperbolic conservation laws," 2020, Journal of Computational Physics
  • "Linearly Stabilized Schemes for the Time Integration of Stiff Nonlinear PDEs," 2021, Journal of Scientific Computing
  • "A Closest Point Method for PDEs on Manifolds with Interior Boundary Conditions for Geometry Processing," 2024, ACM Transactions on Graphics
  • "A closest point method library for PDEs on surfaces with parallel domain decomposition solvers and preconditioners," 2022, Numerical Algorithms

Ruuth frequently collaborates with other researchers. Their notable co-authors include:

  • Ronald D. Haynes
  • Ian C. T. May
  • Alireza Yazdani
  • Leevan Ling
  • K. Victor Chow

Best Publications

  • Implicit-explicit Runge-Kutta methods for time-dependent partial differential equations

    Uri M. Ascher;Steven J. Ruuth;Raymond J. Spiteri

  • Implicit-explicit methods for time-dependent partial differential equations

    Uri M. Ascher;Steven J. Ruuth;Brian T. R. Wetton

  • A New Class of Optimal High-Order Strong-Stability-Preserving Time Discretization Methods

    Raymond J. Spiteri;Steven J. Ruuth

  • A simple embedding method for solving partial differential equations on surfaces

    Steven J. Ruuth;Barry Merriman

  • Implicit-explicit methods for reaction-diffusion problems in pattern formation

    Steven J. Ruuth

  • The Implicit Closest Point Method for the Numerical Solution of Partial Differential Equations on Surfaces

    Colin B. Macdonald;Steven J. Ruuth

  • IMEX extensions of linear multistep methods with general monotonicity and boundedness properties

    Willem Hundsdorfer;Steven J. Ruuth

  • Global optimization of explicit strong-stability-preserving Runge-Kutta methods

    Steven J. Ruuth

  • Implicit-Explicit Methods for Time-Dependent PDE''s

    Uri M. Ascher;Steven J. Ruuth;Brian Wetton

  • Level Set Equations on Surfaces via the Closest Point Method

    Colin B. Macdonald;Steven J. Ruuth

  • Two Barriers on Strong-Stability-Preserving Time Discretization Methods

    Steven J. Ruuth;Raymond J. Spiteri

  • Monotonicity-Preserving Linear Multistep Methods

    Willem Hundsdorfer;Steven J. Ruuth;Raymond J. Spiteri

  • High-Order Strong-Stability-Preserving Runge-Kutta Methods with Downwind-Biased Spatial Discretizations

    Steven J. Ruuth;Raymond J. Spiteri

  • Efficient Algorithms for Diffusion-Generated Motion by Mean Curvature

    Steven J. Ruuth

  • Non-linear evolution using optimal fourth-order strong-stability-preserving Runge-Kutta methods

    Raymond J. Spiteri;Steven J. Ruuth

  • A Diffusion-Generated Approach to Multiphase Motion

    Steven J. Ruuth

  • Solving eigenvalue problems on curved surfaces using the Closest Point Method

    Colin B. Macdonald;Jeremy Brandman;Steven J. Ruuth

  • High-order linear multistep methods with general monotonicity and boundedness properties

    Steven J. Ruuth;Willem Hundsdorfer

  • A Simple Scheme for Volume-Preserving Motion by Mean Curvature

    Steven J. Ruuth;Brian T. R. Wetton

  • Simple computation of reaction-diffusion processes on point clouds.

    Colin B. Macdonald;Barry Merriman;Steven J. Ruuth

  • Threshold dynamics for high order geometric motions

    Selim Esedoglu;Steven J. Ruuth;Richard Tsai

  • Diffusion generated motion using signed distance functions

    Selim Esedoglu;Steven Ruuth;Richard Tsai

Frequent Co-Authors

Willem Hundsdorfer
Willem Hundsdorfer Centrum Wiskunde & Informatica
Richard Tsai
Richard Tsai The University of Texas at Austin
Uri M. Ascher
Uri M. Ascher University of British Columbia
Stanley Osher
Stanley Osher University of California, Los Angeles
Robert D. Russell
Robert D. Russell Simon Fraser University
Michael J. Ward
Michael J. Ward University of British Columbia
Jack Xin
Jack Xin University of California, Irvine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in expanding their expertise beyond Mathematics, pursuing related online degrees can open diverse career pathways. Many students find that combining analytical skills from math with business knowledge leads to high-demand roles. For example, exploring some of the easiest mba to get into can be a practical step for professionals seeking leadership positions without rigorous admission barriers.

Additionally, if affordability is a priority, several programs stand out. The cheapest online masters in finance provide excellent options for students aiming to apply quantitative skills in financial sectors. These degrees often complement mathematics backgrounds effectively.

For those targeting executive roles, pursuing a 1-year 1 year dba program online offers a fast-tracked route to advanced business expertise. Similarly, selecting from the easiest mba programs online can balance flexibility with career advancement.

Combining quantitative skills with business acumen through these related online degrees can significantly enhance job prospects in industries such as finance, consulting, and management. This integrated approach creates versatile professionals ready to tackle complex challenges.

Best Scientists Citing Steven J. Ruuth

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles