World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
38
Citations
4908
World Ranking
8951
National Ranking
4744

Shannon Gwin Mitchell publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Shannon Gwin Mitchell sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 130 publications — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Shannon Gwin Mitchell D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Shannon Gwin Mitchell sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Shannon Gwin Mitchell is affiliated with the Friends Research Institute in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on topics related to substance use disorders and treatment approaches, particularly in the context of opioid use disorder and public health implementation.

The scientist's main fields of study include Medicine and Health Professions, with specific subfields encompassing Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Epidemiology, General Health Professions, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine.

Key research topics covered in their publications are:

  • Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
  • Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects
  • Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Pain Management and Opioid Use
  • Dental Anxiety and Anesthesia Techniques
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Shannon Gwin Mitchell has contributed extensively to several academic journals. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Journal of Substance Use and Addiction Treatment
  • Drug and Alcohol Dependence
  • Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment
  • Addiction Science & Clinical Practice
  • Implementation Research and Practice

Their collaborative work involves several frequent coauthors, notably:

  • Robert P. Schwartz
  • Jan Gryczynski
  • Kevin E. O'Grady
  • Laura B. Monico
  • Marc Fishman

Among recent papers authored, some notable works include:

  • Extended-release naltrexone for youth with opioid use disorder, 2021, Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment
  • Preventing Hospital Readmission for Patients With Comorbid Substance Use Disorder, 2021, Annals of Internal Medicine
  • One million screened: Scaling up SBIRT and buprenorphine treatment in hospital emergency departments across Maryland, 2020, The American Journal of Emergency Medicine
  • Using Timeline Methodology to Visualize Treatment Trajectories of Youth and Young Adults Following Inpatient Opioid Treatment, 2020, International Journal of Qualitative Methods
  • Assessment of Screening Tools to Identify Substance Use Disorders Among Adolescents, 2023, JAMA Network Open

Best Publications

  • SBIRT for adolescent drug and alcohol use: Current status and future directions

    Shannon Gwin Mitchell;Jan Gryczynski;Kevin E. O'Grady;Robert P. Schwartz

  • Why don't out-of-treatment individuals enter methadone treatment programmes?

    James A. Peterson;Robert P. Schwartz;Shannon Gwin Mitchell;Heather Schacht Reisinger

  • Introduction to special issue on social ecological approaches to community health research and action.

    David William Lounsbury;Shannon Gwin Mitchell

  • Predictors of methadone treatment retention from a multi-site study: a survival analysis.

    Sharon M. Kelly;Kevin E. O’Grady;Shannon Gwin Mitchell;Barry S. Brown

  • Validity of Brief Screening Instrument for Adolescent Tobacco, Alcohol, and Drug Use

    Sharon M. Kelly;Jan Gryczynski;Shannon Gwin Mitchell;Arethusa Kirk

  • Update on Barriers to Pharmacotherapy for Opioid Use Disorders.

    Anjalee Sharma;Sharon M. Kelly;Shannon Gwin Mitchell;Jan Gryczynski

  • Attitudes Toward Buprenorphine and Methadone Among Opioid-Dependent Individuals

    Robert P. Schwartz;Sharon M. Kelly;Kevin E. O'Grady;Shannon Gwin Mitchell

  • Leaving buprenorphine treatment: Patients' reasons for cessation of care

    Jan Gryczynski;Shannon Gwin Mitchell;Jerome H. Jaffe;Kevin E. O’Grady

  • Buprenorphine Treatment and 12-step Meeting Attendance: Conflicts, Compatibilities, and Patient Outcomes.

    Laura B. Monico;Jan Gryczynski;Shannon Gwin Mitchell;Robert P. Schwartz

  • Premature Discharge from Methadone Treatment: Patient Perspectives

    Heather Schacht Reisinger;Robert P. Schwartz;Shannon Gwin Gwin Mitchell;James A. Peterson

  • Validation and performance of the Alcohol, Smoking and Substance Involvement Screening Test (ASSIST) among adolescent primary care patients.

    Jan Gryczynski;Sharon M. Kelly;Shannon Gwin Mitchell;Arethusa Kirk

  • Uses of Diverted Methadone and Buprenorphine by Opioid-Addicted Individuals in Baltimore, Maryland

    Shannon Gwin Mitchell;Sharon M. Kelly;Barry S. Brown;Heather Schacht Reisinger

  • Understanding Patterns Of High-Cost Health Care Use Across Different Substance User Groups

    Jan Gryczynski;Robert P. Schwartz;Kevin E. O’Grady;Lauren Restivo

  • Patient perspectives on buprenorphine/naloxone: a qualitative study of retention during the starting treatment with agonist replacement therapies (START) study.

    Cheryl Teruya;Robert P Schwartz;Shannon Gwin Mitchell;Albert L Hasson

  • Patterns in admission delays to outpatient methadone treatment in the United States

    Jan Gryczynski;Robert P. Schwartz;David S. Salkever;Shannon Gwin Mitchell

  • The CRAFFT Cut-Points and DSM-5 Criteria for Alcohol and Other Drugs: A Reevaluation and Reexamination

    Shannon Gwin Mitchell;Sharon M. Kelly;Jan Gryczynski;C. Patrick Myers

  • Preventing Hospital Readmission for Patients With Comorbid Substance Use Disorder : A Randomized Trial.

    Jan Gryczynski;Courtney D Nordeck;Christopher Welsh;Shannon G Mitchell

  • Patient Perspectives on Choosing Buprenorphine Over Methadone in an Urban, Equal‐Access System

    Jan Gryczynski;Jerome H. Jaffe;Robert P. Schwartz;Kristi A. Dušek

  • The Role of Patient Satisfaction in Methadone Treatment

    Sharon M. Kelly;Kevin E. O'Grady;Barry S. Brown;Shannon Gwin Mitchell

  • Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) for Substance Use in a School-Based Program: Services and Outcomes

    Shannon Gwin Mitchell;Jan Gryczynski;Arturo Gonzales;Ana Moseley

  • Rehospitalization and substance use disorder (SUD) treatment entry among patients seen by a hospital SUD consultation-liaison service.

    Courtney D. Nordeck;Christopher Welsh;Robert P. Schwartz;Shannon Gwin Mitchell

  • Changes in Quality of Life following Buprenorphine Treatment: Relationship with Treatment Retention and Illicit Opioid Use.

    Shannon Gwin Mitchell;Jan Gryczynski;Robert P. Schwartz;C. Patrick Myers

  • Computerized versus in‐person brief intervention for drug misuse: a randomized clinical trial

    Robert P. Schwartz;Jan Gryczynski;Shannon Gwin Mitchell;Arturo Gonzales

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert P. Schwartz
Robert P. Schwartz University of Maryland, Baltimore
Kevin E. O'Grady
Kevin E. O'Grady University of Maryland, College Park
Barry S. Brown
Barry S. Brown University of North Carolina Wilmington
Carl A. Latkin
Carl A. Latkin Johns Hopkins University
Gary A. Zarkin
Gary A. Zarkin Research Triangle Park Foundation
Shelly F. Greenfield
Shelly F. Greenfield Harvard University
Karin E. Tobin
Karin E. Tobin Johns Hopkins University
Kevin Knight
Kevin Knight Texas Christian University
Peter D. Friedmann
Peter D. Friedmann University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School
Aimee N. C. Campbell
Aimee N. C. Campbell Columbia University Medical Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in psychology and counseling offers broad opportunities for both study and career advancement. With flexible formats, students can access quality education regardless of location, making it easier to balance studies with personal or work commitments. Choosing the right online program is crucial, however, and factors like accreditation, curriculum, tuition, and graduate outcomes need careful consideration.

Prospective students interested in value and career prospects can explore local options to find programs best suited to their goals. For those in the Northeast, the best value counseling degrees in Philadelphia provide insight into affordable and high-quality choices. Residents of the Pacific Northwest might benefit from the most valuable counseling programs in Seattle.

Similarly, students in the South can investigate the most valuable counseling programs in Texas, while those in the Midwest may wish to review the most valuable counseling degrees in Wisconsin. Exploring these options can help you make informed decisions on specialization, cost, and potential career pathways in psychology and counseling.

Best Scientists Citing Shannon Gwin Mitchell

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles