World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
78
Citations
27472
World Ranking
1189
National Ranking
165

S. Joe Qin publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where S. Joe Qin sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 239 publications — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

S. Joe Qin D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where S. Joe Qin sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 78 D-Index — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

S. Joe Qin is affiliated with Lingnan University in China and specializes in the field of Engineering, with a particular focus on Control and Systems Engineering as evidenced by the majority of their research output. Their work spans several subfields including Artificial Intelligence, Analytical Chemistry, Materials Chemistry, and Mechanical Engineering.

The scientist's recent research includes publications in a range of topics from system control to materials science. Key recent papers include:

  • "Constructing and optimizing core@shell structure CNTs@MoS2 nanocomposites as outstanding microwave absorbers" (2020, Applied Surface Science)
  • "Optimization, selective and efficient production of CNTs/CoxFe3−xO4 core/shell nanocomposites as outstanding microwave absorbers" (2020, Journal of Materials Chemistry C)
  • "Bridging systems theory and data science: A unifying review of dynamic latent variable analytics and process monitoring" (2020, Annual Reviews in Control)
  • "Efficient Dynamic Latent Variable Analysis for High-Dimensional Time Series Data" (2020, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics)
  • "Dynamic latent variable regression for inferential sensor modeling and monitoring" (2020, Computers & Chemical Engineering)

The research of S. Joe Qin addresses several main topics, such as:

  • Fault Detection and Control Systems
  • Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses
  • Control Systems and Identification
  • Advanced Control Systems Optimization
  • Neural Networks and Applications
  • Mineral Processing and Grinding
  • Topic Modeling

Frequent coauthors contributing to their work include Yining Dong, Haoran Xie, Fu Lee Wang, Xiaohui Tao, and Lishuai Li.

Several publication venues have been typical outlets for their work, indicating a diverse interdisciplinary approach. These venues include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • IFAC-PapersOnLine
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics
  • Computers & Chemical Engineering

The collective output demonstrates a blend of theoretical and applied research, particularly emphasizing engineering systems, data analytics for process monitoring, and materials chemistry. Their work contributes frequently to advancing knowledge in control systems, dynamic modeling, and nanocomposite materials research.

Best Publications

  • A survey of industrial model predictive control technology

    S.Joe Qin;Thomas A. Badgwell

  • Statistical process monitoring: basics and beyond

    S. Joe Qin

  • Survey on data-driven industrial process monitoring and diagnosis

    S. Joe Qin

  • Recursive PCA for adaptive process monitoring

    Weihua Li;H.Henry Yue;Sergio Valle-Cervantes;S.Joe Qin

  • Recursive PLS algorithms for adaptive data modeling

    S. Joe Qin

  • An overview of subspace identification

    S. Joe Qin

  • Identification of faulty sensors using principal component analysis

    Ricardo Dunia;S. Joe Qin;Thomas F. Edgar;Thomas J. McAvoy

  • Selection of the Number of Principal Components: The Variance of the Reconstruction Error Criterion with a Comparison to Other Methods†

    Sergio Valle;and Weihua Li;S. Joe Qin

  • Nonlinear PLS Modeling Using Neural Networks

    S.J. Qin;T.J. McAvoy

  • An Overview of Nonlinear Model Predictive Control Applications

    S. Joe Qin;Thomas A. Badgwell

  • Reconstruction-based contribution for process monitoring

    Carlos F. Alcala;S. Joe Qin

  • Reconstruction-Based Fault Identification Using a Combined Index

    H. Henry Yue;S. Joe Qin

  • Multimode process monitoring with Bayesian inference‐based finite Gaussian mixture models

    Jie Yu;S. Joe Qin

  • Subspace approach to multidimensional fault identification and reconstruction

    Ricardo Dunia;S. Joe Qin

  • Total projection to latent structures for process monitoring

    Donghua Zhou;Gang Li;S. Joe Qin

  • Control performance monitoring — a review and assessment

    S. Joe Qin

  • Fault detection and diagnosis based on modified independent component analysis

    Jong-Min Lee;S. Joe Qin;In-Beum Lee

  • A novel dynamic PCA algorithm for dynamic data modeling and process monitoring

    Yining Dong;Yining Dong;S. Joe Qin;S. Joe Qin

  • Process data analytics in the era of big data

    S. Joe Qin

  • Brief paper: Geometric properties of partial least squares for process monitoring

    Gang Li;S. Joe Qin;Donghua Zhou

  • On unifying multiblock analysis with application to decentralized process monitoring

    S. Joe Qin;Sergio Valle;Michael J. Piovoso

  • Multivariate process monitoring and fault diagnosis by multi-scale PCA

    Manish Misra;H.Henry Yue;S.Joe Qin;Cheng Ling

  • Recursive PCA for Adaptive Process Monitoring

    S. Joe Qin;Weihua Li;H. Henry Yue

Frequent Co-Authors

Tianyou Chai
Tianyou Chai Northeastern University
Donghua Zhou
Donghua Zhou Shandong University of Science and Technology
Lennart Ljung
Lennart Ljung Linköping University
Terrence L. Blevins
Terrence L. Blevins Emerson (Sweden)
Muhammad Sahimi
Muhammad Sahimi University of Southern California
Thomas F. Edgar
Thomas F. Edgar The University of Texas at Austin
Thomas J. McAvoy
Thomas J. McAvoy University of Maryland, College Park
In-Beum Lee
In-Beum Lee Pohang University of Science and Technology
Ruilong Deng
Ruilong Deng Zhejiang University
Theodore T. Tsotsis
Theodore T. Tsotsis University of Southern California

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online education in computer science opens a world of flexible learning and career opportunities. Prospective students can start their academic journey with online associates programs, which offer a foundational steppingstone into this dynamic field.

Budget-conscious learners can benefit from the cheapest online colleges to access quality education without a hefty price tag. Accessibility is further enhanced by institutions featuring online graduate programs that accept 2.0 gpa, making advanced study attainable for a broader range of students.

Computer science graduates enjoy diverse pathways, including roles in software development, data analysis, or IT management. Those interested in interdisciplinary fields may also consider how their technology skills connect with environmental science by exploring what can you get with an environmental science degree.

No matter your starting point or future goals, there is an online education pathway in the US to suit your ambitions and circumstances.

Best Scientists Citing S. Joe Qin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles