| Discipline name | D-Index | World Ranking | Current World Ranking | National Ranking | Current National Ranking | Publications | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 50 | 5691 | 5236 | 38 | 36 | 144 | 10567 |
The chart shows the history of publications by Ruth Djaldetti between 1990 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Ruth Djaldetti published across 36 years, from 1990 to 2025, averaging 4.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 13 publications in 2012. 7 of the 168 publications appeared in the last two years.
168 publications in total across all disciplines
| Year | Publications |
|---|---|
| 1990 | 1 |
| 1991 | 0 |
| 1992 | 4 |
| 1993 | 3 |
| 1994 | 3 |
| 1995 | 3 |
| 1996 | 11 |
| 1997 | 0 |
| 1998 | 5 |
| 1999 | 6 |
| 2000 | 3 |
| 2001 | 5 |
| 2002 | 5 |
| 2003 | 5 |
| 2004 | 5 |
| 2005 | 2 |
| 2006 | 12 |
| 2007 | 9 |
| 2008 | 8 |
| 2009 | 3 |
| 2010 | 4 |
| 2011 | 5 |
| 2012 | 13 |
| 2013 | 6 |
| 2014 | 5 |
| 2015 | 3 |
| 2016 | 5 |
| 2017 | 8 |
| 2018 | 5 |
| 2019 | 3 |
| 2020 | 1 |
| 2021 | 1 |
| 2022 | 6 |
| 2023 | 3 |
| 2024 | 4 |
| 2025 | 3 |
| Total | 168 |
The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ruth Djaldetti sits on this spectrum.
This scientist: 144 publications — 40th percentile
40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.
The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.
| Publications | Scientists | This scientist |
|---|---|---|
| 38–47 | 18 | |
| 48–57 | 79 | |
| 58–67 | 193 | |
| 68–77 | 323 | |
| 78–87 | 406 | |
| 88–97 | 452 | |
| 98–107 | 539 | |
| 108–117 | 505 | |
| 118–127 | 522 | |
| 128–137 | 469 | |
| 138–147 | 456 | 144 |
| 148–157 | 459 | |
| 158–167 | 397 | |
| 168–177 | 383 | |
| 178–187 | 350 | |
| 188–197 | 302 | |
| 198–207 | 306 | |
| 208–217 | 262 | |
| 218–227 | 242 | |
| 228–237 | 220 | |
| 238–247 | 203 | |
| 248–257 | 174 | |
| 258–267 | 176 | |
| 268–277 | 175 | |
| 278–287 | 125 | |
| 288–297 | 116 | |
| 298–307 | 127 | |
| 308–317 | 128 | |
| 318–327 | 99 | |
| 328–337 | 89 | |
| 338–347 | 78 | |
| 348–357 | 96 | |
| 358–367 | 66 | |
| 368–377 | 59 | |
| 378–387 | 65 | |
| 388–397 | 54 | |
| 398–407 | 48 | |
| 408–417 | 49 | |
| 418–427 | 34 | |
| 428–437 | 31 | |
| 438–447 | 30 | |
| 448–457 | 31 | |
| 458–467 | 36 | |
| 468–477 | 40 | |
| 478–487 | 35 | |
| 488–497 | 30 | |
| 498–507 | 23 | |
| 508–517 | 26 | |
| 518–527 | 20 | |
| 528–537 | 23 | |
| 538–547 | 20 | |
| 548–557 | 20 | |
| 558–567 | 17 | |
| 568–577 | 14 | |
| 578–587 | 20 | |
| 588–597 | 20 | |
| 598–607 | 19 | |
| 608–617 | 18 | |
| 618–627 | 17 | |
| 628–637 | 11 | |
| 638–647 | 11 | |
| 648–657 | 11 | |
| 658–667 | 8 | |
| 668–677 | 7 | |
| 678–687 | 11 | |
| 688–697 | 10 | |
| 698–707 | 4 | |
| 708–717 | 6 | |
| 718–727 | 5 | |
| 728–737 | 5 | |
| 738–747 | 9 | |
| 748–757 | 9 | |
| 758–767 | 3 | |
| 768–777 | 7 | |
| 778–787 | 7 | |
| 788–797 | 6 | |
| 798–807 | 2 | |
| 808–817 | 2 | |
| 818–827 | 7 | |
| 828–837 | 0 | |
| 838–847 | 9 | |
| 848–857 | 3 | |
| 858–867 | 1 | |
| 868–877 | 3 | |
| 878–886 | 6 | |
| 887+ | 100 |
The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ruth Djaldetti sits on this spectrum.
This scientist: 50 D-Index — 41st percentile
41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.
The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.
| D-Index | Scientists | This scientist |
|---|---|---|
| 30–31 | 42 | |
| 32–33 | 172 | |
| 34–35 | 296 | |
| 36–37 | 435 | |
| 38–39 | 459 | |
| 40–41 | 456 | |
| 42–43 | 467 | |
| 44–45 | 478 | |
| 46–47 | 512 | |
| 48–49 | 435 | |
| 50–51 | 425 | 50 |
| 52–53 | 418 | |
| 54–55 | 392 | |
| 56–57 | 357 | |
| 58–59 | 334 | |
| 60–61 | 328 | |
| 62–63 | 260 | |
| 64–65 | 278 | |
| 66–67 | 239 | |
| 68–69 | 250 | |
| 70–71 | 210 | |
| 72–73 | 200 | |
| 74–75 | 189 | |
| 76–77 | 170 | |
| 78–79 | 146 | |
| 80–81 | 113 | |
| 82–83 | 126 | |
| 84–85 | 100 | |
| 86–87 | 84 | |
| 88–89 | 99 | |
| 90–91 | 84 | |
| 92–93 | 85 | |
| 94–95 | 72 | |
| 96–97 | 76 | |
| 98–99 | 45 | |
| 100–101 | 49 | |
| 102–103 | 43 | |
| 104–105 | 32 | |
| 106–107 | 45 | |
| 108–109 | 50 | |
| 110–111 | 32 | |
| 112–113 | 39 | |
| 114–115 | 32 | |
| 116–117 | 29 | |
| 118–119 | 27 | |
| 120–121 | 19 | |
| 122–123 | 23 | |
| 124–125 | 27 | |
| 126–127 | 16 | |
| 128–129 | 24 | |
| 130–131 | 13 | |
| 132–133 | 21 | |
| 134–135 | 17 | |
| 136–137 | 14 | |
| 138–139 | 15 | |
| 140–141 | 10 | |
| 142–143 | 10 | |
| 144–145 | 13 | |
| 146–147 | 9 | |
| 148–149 | 8 | |
| 150–151 | 6 | |
| 152–153 | 6 | |
| 154–155 | 7 | |
| 156–157 | 7 | |
| 158–159 | 10 | |
| 160–161 | 4 | |
| 162 | 8 | |
| 163+ | 100 |
Carles Vilariño-Güell;Christian Wider;Owen A. Ross;Justus C. Dachsel
Gregor K Wenning;Felix Geser;Felix Geser;Florian Krismer;Klaus Seppi
Ruth Djaldetti;Ilan Ziv;Eldad Melamed
Miquel Vila;Vernice Jackson-Lewis;Slobodanka Vukosavic;Ruth Djaldetti
I Ziv;G Fleminger;R Djaldetti;A Achiron
R. Djaldetti;A. Shifrin;Z. Rogowski;E. Sprecher
Serge Przedborski;Vernice Jackson-Lewis;Ruth Djaldetti;Gabriel Liberatore
Martin Köllensperger;Felix Geser;Jean Pierre Ndayisaba;Sylvia Boesch
Ruth Djaldetti;Ronit Mosberg-Galili;Haza Sroka;Doron Merims
Martin Köllensperger;Felix Geser;Klaus Seppi;Michaela Stampfer-Kountchev
Ruth Djaldetti;Jack Baron;Ilan Ziv;Eldad Melamed
Itay Lotan;Therese A. Treves;Yaniv Roditi;Ruth Djaldetti
J M Rabey;I Sagi;M Huberman;E Melamed
Mordechai Lorberboym;Therese A. Treves;Eldad Melamed;Yair Lampl
H. Bessler;R. Djaldetti;H. Salman;M. Bergman
Vernice Jackson-Lewis;Miquel Vila;Ruth Djaldetti;Christelle Guegan
Felix Geser;Gregor K. Wenning;Klaus Seppi;Michaela Stampfer‐Kountchev
R. Dabby;R. Djaldetti;M. Shahmurov;T. A. Treves
Mordechai Lorberboym;Ruth Djaldetti;Eldad Melamed;Menahem Sadeh
Anette Schrag;Felix Geser;Michaela Stampfer-Kountchev;Klaus Seppi
If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.