World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
115
Citations
53403
World Ranking
449
National Ranking
263

Medicine

D-Index
115
Citations
53495
World Ranking
4512
National Ranking
2452

Robert Y. Moore publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert Y. Moore sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 265 publications — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Robert Y. Moore D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert Y. Moore sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 115 D-Index — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2006 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Robert Y. Moore is affiliated with the University of Pittsburgh in the United States. Their academic career includes recognition by the American scientific community, notably receiving the distinction of Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 2006.

The available information does not specify particular fields or subfields of study, nor does it list any recent publications, co-authors, or frequent venues for publication. Likewise, there are no details on book publications or specific research topics documented in the current data.

The lack of entries for research output or collaborative work suggests either a focus outside the traditional dimensions of research output or incomplete data regarding publications and research activities. However, the AAAS fellowship indicates a level of engagement and contribution within their scientific discipline, as recognized by peers through this professional honor.

Best Publications

  • Loss of a circadian adrenal corticosterone rhythm following suprachiasmatic lesions in the rat.

    Robert Y. Moore;Victor B. Eichler

  • Reduced number of hypocretin neurons in human narcolepsy.

    Thomas C. Thannickal;Robert Y. Moore;Robert Nienhuis;Lalini Ramanathan

  • Suprachiasmatic nucleus : the mind's clock

    D. C. Klein;Robert Y. Moore;Steven M. Reppert

  • A retinohypothalamic projection in the rat

    Robert Y. Moore;Nicholas J. Lenn

  • Catecholamine innervation of the basal forebrain. IV. Topography of the dopamine projection to the basal forebrain and neostriatum.

    James H. Fallon;Robert Y. Moore

  • Ascending projections of the locus coeruleus in the rat. II. Autoradiographic study

    Barbara E. Jones;Barbara E. Jones;Robert Y. Moore;Robert Y. Moore

  • Suprachiasmatic nucleus in the mouse: retinal innervation, intrinsic organization and efferent projections.

    Eric E Abrahamson;Robert Y Moore

  • Visual pathways and the central neural control of a circadian rhythm in pineal serotonin N-acetyltransferase activity

    Robert Y. Moore;Robert Y. Moore;David C. Klein;David C. Klein

  • Serotonin neurons of the midbrain raphe: ascending projections.

    Robert Y. Moore;Angelos E. Halaris;Barbara E. Jones

  • Pineal N-acetyltransferase and hydroxyindole-O-methyltransferase: control by the retinohypothalamic tract and the suprachiasmatic nucleus.

    David C. Klein;David C. Klein;Robert Y. Moore;Robert Y. Moore

  • GABA is the principal neurotransmitter of the circadian system.

    Robert Y. Moore;Joan C. Speh

  • Mesencephalic dopamine neurons projecting to neocortex.

    Olle Lindvall;Olle Lindvall;Anders Björklund;Anders Björklund;Robert Y. Moore;Robert Y. Moore;Ulf Stenevi;Ulf Stenevi

  • Suprachiasmatic nucleus organization

    Robert Y. Moore;Joan C. Speh;Rehana K. Leak

  • Catecholamine innervation of the basal forebrain II. Amygdala, suprarhinal cortex and entorhinal cortex

    James H. Fallon;David A. Koziell;Robert Y. Moore

  • Dopamine nerve terminal degeneration produced by high doses of methylamphetamine in the rat brain

    G.A. Ricaurte;R.W. Guillery;L.S. Seiden;C.R. Schuster

  • The organization of tubero-hypophyseal and reticulo-infundibular catecholamine neuron systems in the rat brain.

    Anders Björklund;Anders Björklund;Robert Y. Moore;Robert Y. Moore;Anders Nobin;Anders Nobin;Ulf Stenevi;Ulf Stenevi

  • Forebrain activation in REM sleep: an FDG PET study.

    Eric A Nofzinger;Mark A Mintun;MaryBeth Wiseman;David J Kupfer

  • Retinohypothalamic projection in mammals: a comparative study ☆

    Robert Y. Moore

  • Cortical cholinergic function is more severely affected in parkinsonian dementia than in Alzheimer disease: an in vivo positron emission tomographic study.

    Nicolaas I. Bohnen;Daniel I. Kaufer;Larry S. Ivanco;Brian Lopresti

  • Serotonin in aging, late-life depression, and alzheimer's disease : The emerging role of functional imaging

    Carolyn Cidis Meltzer;Gwenn Smith;Steven T. Dekosky;Bruce G. Pollock

  • Handbook of Behavioral Neurobiology

    Joseph S. Takahashi;Fred W. Turek;Robert Y. Moore

Frequent Co-Authors

Nicolaas I. Bohnen
Nicolaas I. Bohnen University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Lawrence P. Morin
Lawrence P. Morin Stony Brook University
David J. Kupfer
David J. Kupfer University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine
Chester A. Mathis
Chester A. Mathis University of Pittsburgh
Carolyn C. Meltzer
Carolyn C. Meltzer Emory University
Eric A. Nofzinger
Eric A. Nofzinger University of Pittsburgh
Barbara E. Jones
Barbara E. Jones McGill University
Steven T. DeKosky
Steven T. DeKosky University of Florida
Pat Levitt
Pat Levitt University of Southern California
Anders Björklund
Anders Björklund Lund University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Robert Y. Moore

Recently Published Articles