World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
37
Citations
6393
World Ranking
8751
National Ranking
29

Richard D. Jones publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard D. Jones sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 210 publications — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Richard D. Jones D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard D. Jones sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • IMPAIRMENT AND RECOVERY OF IPSILATERAL SENSORY-MOTOR FUNCTION FOLLOWING UNILATERAL CEREBRAL INFARCTION

    Richard D. Jones;Ivan Macg. Donaldson;Philip J. Parkin

  • Impaired eye movements in post-concussion syndrome indicate suboptimal brain function beyond the influence of depression, malingering or intellectual ability.

    Marcus H Heitger;Richard D Jones;Richard D Jones;A D Macleod;Deborah L Snell

  • A multistage system to detect epileptiform activity in the EEG

    A.A. Dingle;R.D. Jones;G.J. Carroll;W.R. Fright

  • A central executive deficit in patients with Parkinson's disease.

    J C Dalrymple-Alford;A S Kalders;R D Jones;R W Watson

  • Eye movement and visuomotor arm movement deficits following mild closed head injury

    M.H. Heitger;T.J. Anderson;R.D. Jones;J.C. Dalrymple-Alford

  • EEG-Based Lapse Detection With High Temporal Resolution

    P.R. Davidson;R.D. Jones;M.T.R. Peiris

  • Motor deficits and recovery during the first year following mild closed head injury.

    Marcus H. Heitger;Richard D. Jones;John C. Dalrymple-Alford;Chris M. Frampton

  • Skill training for swallowing rehabilitation in patients with Parkinson's disease.

    Ruvini P. Athukorala;Richard D. Jones;Oshrat Sella;Maggie-Lee Huckabee

  • Genetic Regulation of Birth Weight and Fasting Glucose by a Common Polymorphism in the Islet Cell Promoter of the Glucokinase Gene

    Michael N Weedon;Timothy M Frayling;Beverley Shields;Beatrice Knight

  • Mild traumatic brain injury and fatigue: a prospective longitudinal study.

    Joan Norrie;Marcus H. Heitger;Janet Leathem;Tim Anderson

  • Frequent lapses of responsiveness during an extended visuomotor tracking task in non-sleep-deprived subjects.

    Malik T. R. Peiris;Richard D. Jones;Paul R. Davidson;Grant J. Carroll

  • Losing the struggle to stay awake: Divergent thalamic and cortical activity during microsleeps

    Govinda Poudel;Govinda Poudel;Carrie R Innes;Philip J Bones;Richard Watts

  • Detection of epileptiform discharges in the EEG by a hybrid system comprising mimetic, self-organized artificial neural network, and fuzzy logic stages

    Christopher J. James;Richard D. Jones;Philip J. Bones;Grant J. Carroll

  • Assessment and training of brain-damaged drivers.

    Richard Jones;Helen Giddens;Dinah Croft

  • Saccade sequences as markers for cerebral dysfunction following mild closed head injury.

    Marcus H. Heitger;T. J. Anderson;R. D. Jones

  • Impairment of high-contrast visual acuity in Parkinson's disease.

    Richard D. Jones;Ivan M. Donaldson;Paul L. Timmings

  • A new approach to predicting postconcussion syndrome after mild traumatic brain injury based upon eye movement function

    Marcus H. Heitger;Richard D. Jones;Tim J. Anderson

  • Adaptive modification of saccade amplitude in Parkinson’s disease

    Michael R. MacAskill;Tim J. Anderson;Richard D. Jones

  • Wavelet analysis of transient biomedical signals and its application to detection of epileptiform activity in the EEG.

    Hansjerg Goelz;Richard D. Jones;Philip J. Bones

  • Expert system approach to detection of epileptiform activity in the EEG.

    B. L. K. Davey;W. R. Fright;G. J. Carroll;R. D. Jones

Frequent Co-Authors

Tim J. Anderson
Tim J. Anderson Texas Biomedical Research Institute
John C. Dalrymple-Alford
John C. Dalrymple-Alford University of Canterbury
Chris Frampton
Chris Frampton University of Otago
Fabio Babiloni
Fabio Babiloni Sapienza University of Rome
Jean Golding
Jean Golding University of Bristol
George Davey Smith
George Davey Smith University of Bristol
Susan M. Ring
Susan M. Ring University of Bristol
Laura Astolfi
Laura Astolfi Sapienza University of Rome
Sean P.A. Drummond
Sean P.A. Drummond Monash University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience opens doors to a variety of online degrees and certifications that can expand your career prospects. If you're interested in maximizing your future earnings, look into highest paying college majors to see where neuroscience fits, alongside other lucrative fields like engineering or computer science.

For those concerned about cost, consider programs from online colleges that take financial aid. These institutions may offer accessible tuition, allowing you to pursue your neuroscience or related degree with less financial strain.

Alternatively, you could supplement your credentials with certificates online that are affordable and valued by employers in healthcare, psychology, or data science.

If you want a fast track or a flexible entry point, explore what is the easiest degree to get online. Some options may complement your neuroscience interests while fitting your schedule.

Best Scientists Citing Richard D. Jones

Trending Scientists