World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Ricardo Chacartegui

Ricardo Chacartegui

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
49
Citations
7576
World Ranking
4408
National Ranking
98

Ricardo Chacartegui publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ricardo Chacartegui sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 169 publications — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Ricardo Chacartegui D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ricardo Chacartegui sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ricardo Chacartegui is affiliated with the University of Seville in Spain and has an extensive publication record primarily focused on engineering disciplines. Their research spans a broad range of engineering subfields, including mechanical engineering, biomedical engineering, electrical and electronic engineering, renewable energy, sustainability and the environment, and materials chemistry.

The scientist's recent research contributions include several papers published in notable journals. These works address topics such as natural ventilation in classrooms within Mediterranean climates, oxygen production methods for oxy-fuel combustion, the physicochemical properties of Portland cement blended with calcium carbonate as supplementary cementitious material, increasing solar energy share in combined cycles through thermochemical energy storage, and scaling up calcium-looping processes for CO2 capture and energy storage. Specific published papers include:

  • Natural ventilation in classrooms for healthy schools in the COVID era in Mediterranean climate, 2021, published in Building and Environment
  • Oxygen production routes assessment for oxy-fuel combustion, 2022, published in Energy
  • The physicochemical properties of Portland cement blended with calcium carbonate with different morphologies as a supplementary cementitious material, 2022, published in Journal of Cleaner Production
  • Increasing the solar share in combined cycles through thermochemical energy storage, 2020, published in Energy Conversion and Management
  • Scaling-up the Calcium-Looping Process for CO2 Capture and Energy Storage, 2020, published in KONA Powder and Particle Journal

Chacartegui has collaborated frequently with several researchers throughout their career. The most frequent coauthors include:

  • C. Ortiz
  • J.A. Becerra
  • A. Carro
  • Luis A. Pérez-Maqueda
  • José Manuel Valverde

The scientist's work has been published predominantly in these venues:

  • Energy
  • Energy Conversion and Management
  • Journal of Cleaner Production
  • Chemical Engineering Journal
  • SSRN Electronic Journal

Their research interest centers on chemical looping and thermochemical processes, adsorption and cooling systems, carbon dioxide capture technologies, integrated energy systems optimization, thermodynamic and exergetic analyses of power and cooling systems, building energy and comfort optimization, and phase change materials research.

Best Publications

  • Alternative ORC bottoming cycles FOR combined cycle power plants

    R. Chacartegui;D. Sánchez;J.M. Muñoz;T. Sánchez

  • Advances in thermal energy storage materials and their applications towards zero energy buildings: A critical review

    Jesús Lizana;Ricardo Chacartegui;Angela Barrios-Padura;José Manuel Valverde

  • Thermochemical energy storage of concentrated solar power by integration of the calcium looping process and a CO2 power cycle

    R. Chacartegui;A. Alovisio;A. Alovisio;C. Ortiz;J.M. Valverde

  • The Calcium-Looping (CaCO3/CaO) process for thermochemical energy storage in Concentrating Solar Power plants

    C. Ortiz;J.M. Valverde;Ricardo Chacartegui;Luis A. Pérez-Maqueda

  • Alternative cycles based on carbon dioxide for central receiver solar power plants

    R. Chacartegui;J.M. Muñoz de Escalona;D. Sánchez;B. Monje

  • Optimizing the CSP-Calcium Looping integration for Thermochemical Energy Storage

    A. Alovisio;A. Alovisio;R. Chacartegui;C. Ortiz;J.M. Valverde

  • Power cycles integration in concentrated solar power plants with energy storage based on calcium looping

    C. Ortiz;R. Chacartegui;J.M. Valverde;A. Alovisio

  • Process integration of Calcium-Looping thermochemical energy storage system in concentrating solar power plants

    C. Ortiz;M.C. Romano;J.M. Valverde;M. Binotti

  • Advanced low-carbon energy measures based on thermal energy storage in buildings: A review

    Jesús Lizana;Ricardo Chacartegui;Angela Barrios-Padura;Carlos Ortiz

  • Identification of potential indoor air pollutants in schools

    Jose A. Becerra;Jesus Lizana;Maite Gil;Angela Barrios-Padura

  • Carbonation of Limestone Derived CaO for Thermochemical Energy Storage: From Kinetics to Process Integration in Concentrating Solar Plants

    C. Ortíz;J.M. Valverde;R. Chacartegui;Luis A. Pérez-Maqueda

  • Energy flexible building through smart demand-side management and latent heat storage

    Jesus Lizana;Daniel Friedrich;Renaldi Renaldi;Ricardo Chacartegui

  • Natural ventilation in classrooms for healthy schools in the COVID era in Mediterranean climate

    Unknown

  • Natural ventilation systems in 21st-century for near zero energy school buildings

    Maite Gil-Baez;Ángela Barrios-Padura;Marta Molina-Huelva;R. Chacartegui

  • Thermal and electrochemical model of internal reforming solid oxide fuel cells with tubular geometry

    D. Sánchez;R. Chacartegui;A. Muñoz;T. Sánchez

  • Analysis of two heat storage integrations for an Organic Rankine Cycle Parabolic trough solar power plant

    Ricardo Chacartegui;Leo Vigna;Leo Vigna;J.A. Becerra;Vittorio Verda

  • Multi-criteria assessment for the effective decision management in residential energy retrofitting

    Jesús Lizana;ÿngela Barrios-Padura;Marta Molina-Huelva;Ricardo Chacartegui

  • Analysis of combustion turbine inlet air cooling systems applied to an operating cogeneration power plant

    R. Chacartegui;F. Jiménez-Espadafor;D. Sánchez;T. Sánchez

  • Real time simulation of medium size gas turbines

    R. Chacartegui;D. Sánchez;A. Muñoz;T. Sánchez

  • Numerical and experimental analysis of municipal solid wastes gasification process

    Nuno Couto;Nuno Couto;Valter Silva;Valter Silva;Eliseu Monteiro;Sandra Teixeira

  • On the effect of methane internal reforming modelling in solid oxide fuel cells

    D. Sánchez;R. Chacartegui;A. Muñoz;T. Sánchez

Frequent Co-Authors

David Sánchez
David Sánchez University of Seville
Jose Manuel Valverde
Jose Manuel Valverde University of Seville
Vittorio Verda
Vittorio Verda Polytechnic University of Turin
Susana Marta Almeida
Susana Marta Almeida Instituto Superior Técnico
Luis A. Pérez-Maqueda
Luis A. Pérez-Maqueda Spanish National Research Council
Stefano Campanari
Stefano Campanari Polytechnic University of Milan
Abel Rouboa
Abel Rouboa University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro
Matteo C. Romano
Matteo C. Romano Polytechnic University of Milan
Luis M. Romeo
Luis M. Romeo University of Zaragoza
Antonio Perejón
Antonio Perejón University of Seville

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Engineering and Technology in the USA unlocks diverse opportunities, and many students also explore related fields through flexible online degrees. If you’re considering expanding your skills or complementing your technical background, there are a variety of online degree pathways worth exploring.

Business knowledge is in high demand—many online students pursue an online mba under 35k to gain managerial expertise affordably. Accreditation also matters; programs like the aacsb online mba offer recognized, rigorous business training that pairs well with technology skills.

For students interested in digital innovation, a social media marketing degree online can provide essential strategies for today’s digital landscape—an area closely tied to technology and engineering trends. Meanwhile, the booming service sector offers fast-track options like hospitality management courses online, perfect for those intrigued by operations and technology in hospitality.

Exploring these online degrees can broaden your knowledge, boost your career prospects, and help you stay competitive in the rapidly evolving engineering and technology fields.

Best Scientists Citing Ricardo Chacartegui

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles