World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
45
Citations
7816
World Ranking
7239
National Ranking
3160

Quentin F. Stout publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Quentin F. Stout sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 194 publications — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Quentin F. Stout D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Quentin F. Stout sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Quentin F. Stout is affiliated with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of Computer Science, with a focus on several subfields and topics related to machine learning, algorithms, and statistical methods.

The main fields of study in which Stout has contributed include:

  • Computer Science

More specifically, their work covers subfields such as:

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
  • Statistics and Probability
  • Information Systems
  • Hardware and Architecture

In terms of research topics, Stout's publications address areas including:

  • Machine Learning and Algorithms
  • Statistical Methods and Inference
  • Machine Learning and Data Classification
  • Graph Theory and Algorithms
  • Recommender Systems and Techniques
  • Topic Modeling
  • Semantic Web and Ontologies

Stout has contributed multiple papers primarily published in arXiv (Cornell University), which is the main venue for their work. Notable recent papers are:

  • "Generating Artificial Core Users for Interpretable Condensed Data," 2021, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "$L_0$ Isotonic Regression With Secondary Objectives," 2021, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "$L_p$ Isotonic Regression Algorithms Using an $L_0$ Approach," 2021, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "Low Power Mesh Algorithms for Image Problems," 2022, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "Best $L_p$ Isotonic Regressions, $p \in \{0, 1, \infty\}$," 2023, arXiv (Cornell University)

Their frequent coauthor includes Amy Nesky, with whom Stout has collaborated on at least one publication.

Best Publications

  • Space Weather Modeling Framework: A new tool for the space science community

    Gábor Tóth;Igor V. Sokolov;Tamas I. Gombosi;David R. Chesney

  • Adaptive numerical algorithms in space weather modeling

    Gábor Tóth;Bart van der Holst;Igor V. Sokolov;Darren L. De Zeeuw

  • Parallel computations on reconfigurable meshes

    R. Miller;V.K. Prasanna-Kumar;D.I. Reisis;Q.F. Stout

  • ARCHITECTURE OF A HYPERCUBE SUPERCOMPUTER.

    John P. Hayes;Trevor N. Mudge;Quentin F. Stout

  • Meshes with reconfigurable buses

    Russ Miller;V. K. Prasanna-Kumar;Dionisios Reisis;Quentin F. Stout

  • A Microprocessor-based Hypercube Supercomputer

    John P. Hayes;Trevor Mudge;Quentin F. Stout;Stephen Colley

  • Intensive hypercube communication. Prearranged communication in link-bound machines

    Quentin F. Stout;Bruce Wagar

  • PERFECT DOMINATING SETS

    Marilynn Livingston;Quentin F. Stout

  • Efficient parallel convex hull algorithms

    R. Miller;Q.F. Stout

  • Mesh computer algorithms for computational geometry

    R. Miller;Q.F. Stout

  • Distributed genetic algorithms for function optimization

    Reiko Tanese;John H. Holland;Quentin F. Stout

  • Data movement techniques for the pyramid computer

    Russ Miller;Quentin Stout

  • Meshes with multiple buses

    Quentin F. Stout

  • Geometric algorithms for digitized pictures on a mesh-connected computer

    R. Miller;Q.F. Stout

  • CRASH: A BLOCK-ADAPTIVE-MESH CODE FOR RADIATIVE SHOCK HYDRODYNAMICS—IMPLEMENTATION AND VERIFICATION

    B. van der Holst;G. Tóth;I. V. Sokolov;K. G. Powell

  • Hypercube message routing in the presence of faults

    Jesse M. Gordon;Quentin F. Stout

  • An adaptive MHD method for global space weather simulations

    D.L. De Zeeuw;T.I. Gombosi;C.P.T. Groth;K.G. Powell

  • Data Movement Operations and Applications on Reconfigurable VLSI Arrays.

    Russ Miller;Viktor K. Prasanna;Dionisios I. Reisis;Quentin F. Stout

  • Distributing resources in hypercube computers

    M. Livingston;Q. F. Stout

  • Block-Structured Adaptive Grids on the Sphere: Advection Experiments

    Christiane Jablonowski;Michael Herzog;Joyce E. Penner;Robert C. Oehmke

Frequent Co-Authors

Tamas I. Gombosi
Tamas I. Gombosi University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Aaron J. Ridley
Aaron J. Ridley University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Joyce E. Penner
Joyce E. Penner University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Kirk C. Hansen
Kirk C. Hansen University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus
Bram van Leer
Bram van Leer University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
C. R. Clauer
C. R. Clauer Virginia Tech
Igor M. Sokolov
Igor M. Sokolov Tufts University
John P. Hayes
John P. Hayes University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Trevor Mudge
Trevor Mudge University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
William Martin
William Martin Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens doors to numerous online degree options and career trajectories across technology and business sectors. Many students choose closely related degrees that complement their computer science knowledge or broaden their career potential.

For those interested in cybersecurity, law enforcement, or digital forensics, some of the cheapest online criminal justice degrees provide a solid foundation at an affordable cost. If your goals include finance, tech auditing, or data analysis, pursuing an accredited online accounting degree can add valuable credentials.

Data professionals are also in demand across all industries. Specialized data science degrees online focus on advanced analytics, machine learning, and big data — skills highly sought after by employers.

Additionally, tech-driven project management roles can be accessed through a accelerated construction management degree online. This pathway combines engineering principles with practical leadership techniques to fast-track your credentials.

By exploring these related online degrees, students can customize their education to match evolving career goals in today’s digital world.

Best Scientists Citing Quentin F. Stout

Trending Scientists