World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering

D-Index
37
Citations
3391
World Ranking
2465
National Ranking
182

Pooya Sareh publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pooya Sareh sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 659+

This scientist: 93 publications — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

Pooya Sareh D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pooya Sareh sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Rotorigami: A rotary origami protective system for robotic rotorcraft

    Unknown

  • Review of State of the Art of Dowel Laminated Timber Members and Densified Wood Materials as Sustainable Engineered Wood Products for Construction and Building Applications

    Adeayo Sotayo;Daniel Bradley;Michael Bather;Pooya Sareh

  • Additive Manufacturing Technologies for Drug Delivery Applications.

    Unknown

  • Machine learning applied to the design and inspection of reinforced concrete bridges: Resilient methods and emerging applications

    Unknown

  • The least symmetric crystallographic derivative of the developable double corrugation surface: Computational design using underlying conic and cubic curves

    Unknown

  • Multi-stability of the hexagonal origami hypar based on group theory and symmetry breaking

    Unknown

  • Particle Swarm Optimization-Based Metaheuristic Design Generation of Non-Trivial Flat-Foldable Origami Tessellations With Degree-4 Vertices

    Unknown

  • Feasible Prestress Modes for Cable-Strut Structures with Multiple Self-Stress States Using Particle Swarm Optimization

    Unknown

  • Design and low-velocity impact behavior of an origami-bellow foldcore honeycomb acoustic metastructure

    Unknown

  • A programmable auxetic metamaterial with tunable crystal symmetry

    Unknown

  • Design of isomorphic symmetric descendants of the Miura-ori

    Unknown

  • Selective hinge removal strategy for architecting hierarchical auxetic metamaterials

    Unknown

  • Geometric design classification of kirigami-inspired metastructures and metamaterials

    Unknown

  • Multi-Objective Crystal Structure Algorithm (MOCryStAl): Introduction and Performance Evaluation

    Nima Khodadadi;Mahdi Azizi;Siamak Talatahari;Pooya Sareh

  • Assigning mountain-valley fold lines of flat-foldable origami patterns based on graph theory and mixed-integer linear programming

    Unknown

  • Computational Modeling and Energy Absorption Behavior of Thin-Walled Tubes with the Kresling Origami Pattern

    Unknown

  • Intrinsic non-flat-foldability of two-tile DDC surfaces composed of glide-reflected irregular quadrilaterals

    Unknown

  • Data-driven design and morphological analysis of conical six-fold origami structures

    Unknown

  • An Integrated Geometric-Graph-Theoretic Approach to Representing Origami Structures and Their Corresponding Truss Frameworks

    Unknown

  • Anchoring like octopus: biologically inspired soft artificial sucker

    Sina Sareh;Kaspar Althoefer;Min Li;Yohan Noh

Frequent Co-Authors

Siamak Talatahari
Siamak Talatahari University of Tabriz
Simon D. Guest
Simon D. Guest University of Cambridge
Morteza Mahmoudi
Morteza Mahmoudi Michigan State University
Kaspar Althoefer
Kaspar Althoefer Queen Mary University of London
Barbara Mazzolai
Barbara Mazzolai Italian Institute of Technology
Salim Belouettar
Salim Belouettar Luxembourg Institute of Science and Technology
Zhongwei Guan
Zhongwei Guan University of Liverpool

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, exploring related online degrees can open diverse career opportunities. Understanding the online speech pathology school cost is crucial for those considering parallel paths in healthcare technology or rehabilitation engineering, where mechanical systems support therapeutic devices.

Military veterans looking to transition into engineering or allied fields might find valuable options through military friendly online speech pathology degree programs. These programs often recognize prior experience and provide flexible schedules, making them attractive for those balancing service commitments with education.

For accelerated educational routes, exploring the best 5 year speech pathology programs can inspire engineering students looking to fast-track dual qualifications or interdisciplinary expertise.

Additionally, expanding career horizons beyond engineering, such as into behavioral and investigative roles, is possible by understanding pathways like how to become a profiler. Analytical skills developed in engineering can be highly valuable in such dynamic professions.

Best Scientists Citing Pooya Sareh

Recently Published Articles