World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Pinhas N. Dannon

Pinhas N. Dannon

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 39 8496 7933 89 82 153 7780

Pinhas N. Dannon publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Pinhas N. Dannon between 1995 and 2021, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Pinhas N. Dannon published across 27 years, from 1995 to 2021, averaging 5.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 13 publications in 2000. 2 of the 154 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1995 to 2021. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 13. Peak 13 publications in 2000. 1995: 3 publications 1996: 5 publications 1997: 10 publications 1998: 6 publications 1999: 8 publications 2000: 13 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 11 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 9 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 12 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 1 publication 2018: 4 publications 2019: 2 publications 2020: 0 publications 2021: 2 publications
1995 2021

154 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Pinhas N. Dannon: publications per year, 1995 to 2021
Year Publications
1995 3
1996 5
1997 10
1998 6
1999 8
2000 13
2001 5
2002 11
2003 5
2004 9
2005 5
2006 12
2007 5
2008 3
2009 4
2010 7
2011 8
2012 5
2013 4
2014 6
2015 7
2016 4
2017 1
2018 4
2019 2
2020 0
2021 2
Total 154
Download as CSV

Pinhas N. Dannon publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pinhas N. Dannon sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 151–160 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 153 publications — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576 153
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Pinhas N. Dannon D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pinhas N. Dannon sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 38–39 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641 39
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Pinhas N. Dannon is affiliated with Tel Aviv University in Israel. Their research spans multiple fields within psychology and medicine, with a particular focus on psychiatry and mental health, experimental and cognitive psychology, and clinical psychology.

Their work addresses several main topics, including:

  • Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Anxiety, depression, psychometrics, treatment, and cognitive processes
  • Obsessive-compulsive spectrum disorders

Pinhas N. Dannon has contributed to scholarly literature through publications in peer-reviewed journals. One of their recent papers is titled The Influence of Substance Abuse on Inhibition Capacities and Risky Decision in a Group of Outpatient Schizophrenia Patients, published in 2021 in the Journal of Dual Diagnosis.

Frequent collaborators in their research include:

  • Lior Glick
  • Semion Kertzman
  • Aviva Wolf
  • Marina Kupchik
  • Maya Kuperberg

Their publications have appeared primarily in the Journal of Dual Diagnosis.

Best Publications

  • Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in the Treatment of Depression

    Ari A. Gershon;Pinhas N. Dannon;Leon Grunhaus

  • Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation is as effective as electroconvulsive therapy in the treatment of nondelusional major depressive disorder: an open study.

    Leon Grunhaus;Pinhas N Dannon;Shaul Schreiber;Ornah H Dolberg

  • Efficacy and safety of deep transcranial magnetic stimulation for major depression: a prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial

    Yechiel Levkovitz;Moshe Isserles;Frank Padberg;Sarah H. Lisanby

  • Smoking Cessation Induced by Deep Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of the Prefrontal and Insular Cortices: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial

    Limor Dinur-Klein;Limor Dinur-Klein;Pinhas Dannon;Aviad Hadar;Oded Rosenberg

  • Internet addiction is associated with social anxiety in young adults.

    Aviv Weinstein;Dikla Dorani;Rotem Elhadif;Yehely Bukovza

  • A randomized controlled comparison of electroconvulsive therapy and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in severe and resistant nonpsychotic major depression.

    Leon Grunhaus;Shaul Schreiber;Ornah T Dolberg;Dana Polak

  • Internet Addiction Disorder: Overview and Controversies

    Aviv Weinstein;Laura Curtiss Feder;Kenneth Paul Rosenberg;Pinhas Dannon

  • Transcranial electrical and magnetic stimulation (tES and TMS) for addiction medicine: A consensus paper on the present state of the science and the road ahead

    Hamed Ekhtiari;Hosna Tavakoli;Giovanni Addolorato;Chris Baeken

  • A transdiagnostic dimensional approach towards a neuropsychological assessment for addiction: an international Delphi consensus study

    Murat Yücel;Erin Oldenhof;Serge H. Ahmed;David Belin

  • Three and six-month outcome following courses of either ECT or rTMS in a population of severely depressed individuals—preliminary report

    Pinhas N Dannon;Ornah T Dolberg;Shaul Schreiber;Leon Grunhaus

  • Transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with bipolar depression: a double blind, controlled study

    OT Dolberg;PN Dannon;S Schreiber;L Grunhaus

  • Go–no-go performance in pathological gamblers

    Semion Kertzman;Katherine Lowengrub;Anat Aizer;Michael Vainder

  • Anger, impulsivity and suicide risk

    Neta Horesh;Tzipora Rolnick;Iulian Iancu;Pinhas Dannon

  • Topiramate versus fluvoxamine in the treatment of pathological gambling: a randomized, blind-rater comparison study.

    Pinhas N Dannon;Katherine Lowengrub;Yehudit Gonopolski;Ernest Musin

  • Pindolol augmentation in treatment-resistant obsessive compulsive disorder: a double-blind placebo controlled trial.

    Pinhas N Dannon;Yehuda Sasson;Shmuel Hirschmann;Iulian Iancu

  • Sustained-release Bupropion Versus Naltrexone in the Treatment of Pathological Gambling: A Preliminary Blind-rater Study

    Pinhas N Dannon;Katherine Lowengrub;Ernest Musin;Yehudit Gonopolski

  • Pindolol augmentation in patients with treatment-resistant panic disorder: A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

    Shmuel Hirschmann;Pinhas N. Dannon;Iulian Iancu;Ornah T. Dolberg

  • Stroop performance in pathological gamblers.

    Semion Kertzman;Katherine Lowengrub;Anat Aizer;Zeev Ben Nahum

  • Coping styles and suicide risk.

    N. Horesh;T. Rolnick;I. Iancu;P. Dannon

  • Comorbid cannabis use and panic disorder: short term and long term follow-up study.

    Pinhas N. Dannon;Katherine Lowengrub;Revital Amiaz;Leon Grunhaus

Frequent Co-Authors

Moshe Kotler
Moshe Kotler Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Shaul Schreiber
Shaul Schreiber Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center
Abraham Zangen
Abraham Zangen Ben-Gurion University of the Negev
Joseph Zohar
Joseph Zohar Sheba Medical Center
Aviv Weinstein
Aviv Weinstein Ariel University
Netta Horesh
Netta Horesh Bar-Ilan University
Alan Apter
Alan Apter Reichman University
Abraham Weizman
Abraham Weizman Tel Aviv University
Brian L. Odlaug
Brian L. Odlaug University of Minnesota
Yechiel Levkovitz
Yechiel Levkovitz Tel Aviv University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a psychology degree in the USA opens doors to various online programs and career pathways. Many students explore related fields such as social work, counseling, or mental health services to expand their job prospects.

Social work is a popular pathway for psychology graduates. Requirements and pathways can vary by state. For example, if you're interested in how to become a social worker in Kentucky, you'll need to understand state-specific licensing and degree requirements. Similarly, Louisiana social work education requirements outline the academic and fieldwork expectations needed to practice professionally.

Other states such as Maine and Maryland have their own standards. Learn more about how to become a social worker in Maine, which highlights important state regulations and certification steps. Meanwhile, how to become a social worker in Maryland is a comprehensive resource for those seeking to work in Maryland’s evolving social work sector.

Exploring online psychology and social work degrees can help you tailor your education to your desired career path, while also meeting local licensure requirements.

Best Scientists Citing Pinhas N. Dannon

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles