World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Chemistry

D-Index
51
Citations
8789
World Ranking
14009
National Ranking
784

Philip M. Williams publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Chemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip M. Williams sits on this spectrum.

61–80 publications: 66 scientists 81–100 publications: 302 scientists 101–120 publications: 623 scientists 121–140 publications: 918 scientists 141–160 publications: 1,218 scientists 161–180 publications: 1,350 scientists 181–200 publications: 1,344 scientists 201–220 publications: 1,281 scientists 221–240 publications: 1,216 scientists 241–260 publications: 1,100 scientists 261–280 publications: 979 scientists 281–300 publications: 939 scientists 301–320 publications: 764 scientists 321–340 publications: 643 scientists 341–360 publications: 628 scientists 361–380 publications: 522 scientists 381–400 publications: 459 scientists 401–420 publications: 397 scientists 421–440 publications: 327 scientists 441–460 publications: 270 scientists 461–480 publications: 265 scientists 481–500 publications: 252 scientists 501–520 publications: 201 scientists 521–540 publications: 185 scientists 541–560 publications: 148 scientists 561–580 publications: 148 scientists 581–600 publications: 132 scientists 601–620 publications: 114 scientists 621–640 publications: 104 scientists 641–660 publications: 91 scientists 661–680 publications: 92 scientists 681–700 publications: 73 scientists 701–720 publications: 57 scientists 721–740 publications: 54 scientists 741–760 publications: 67 scientists 761–780 publications: 45 scientists 781–800 publications: 46 scientists 801–820 publications: 39 scientists 821–840 publications: 32 scientists 841–860 publications: 36 scientists 861–880 publications: 29 scientists 881–900 publications: 26 scientists 901–920 publications: 24 scientists 921–940 publications: 14 scientists 941–960 publications: 23 scientists 961–980 publications: 28 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 15 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 29 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 12 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 19 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 12 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 6 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 8 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 12 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 5 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 6 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 14 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 7 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 2 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 6 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 4 scientists 1,281–1,294 publications: 6 scientists 1,295+ publications: 100 scientists
61 publications 1,295+

This scientist: 138 publications — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more.

Philip M. Williams D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip M. Williams sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 612 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 808 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 776 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 835 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 861 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 872 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 933 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,051 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 930 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 882 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 834 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 731 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 775 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 683 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 646 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 561 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 501 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 437 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 388 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 354 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 292 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 275 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 254 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 235 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 185 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 192 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 155 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 163 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 125 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 105 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 105 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 112 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 88 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 68 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 69 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 65 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 79 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 61 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 44 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 40 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 33 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 26 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 34 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 35 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 25 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 27 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 17 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 16 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 20 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 20 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 15 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 9 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 11 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 3 scientists 158 D-Index: 3 scientists 159+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 159+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more.

Overview

Philip M. Williams is affiliated with the University of Nottingham in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focuses on medicine, with significant contributions across physiology, molecular biology, biomedical engineering, astronomy and astrophysics, and environmental engineering.

Williams has published extensively on various topics within these fields. The main topics of their work include spaceflight effects on biology, 3D printing in biomedical research, medical and biological ozone research, genetics, aging, and longevity in model organisms, innovative microfluidic and catalytic techniques, mass spectrometry techniques and applications, and space exploration and technology.

Frequent publication venues for Williams include:

  • Preprints.org
  • Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies
  • ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
  • Advanced Healthcare Materials
  • Numerical Algorithms

Williams often collaborates with a consistent group of coauthors, including Volker Hessel, Morgan R. Alexander, Li Shean Toh, Ian D. Fisk, and Paul Williams.

Their recent scholarly works demonstrate a range of topics and research methods. Notable papers include:

  • Protein identification by 3D OrbiSIMS to facilitate in situ imaging and depth profiling, 2020, Nature Communications
  • Impact of cold plasma on the biomolecules and organoleptic properties of foods: A review, 2021, Journal of Food Science
  • Space Medicines for Space Health, 2022, ACS Medicinal Chemistry Letters
  • Immunity in Space: Prokaryote Adaptations and Immune Response in Microgravity, 2021, Life
  • Routine omics collection is a golden opportunity for European human research in space and analog environments, 2022, Patterns

Williams' research frequently addresses interdisciplinary themes linking biology and space sciences, often incorporating advanced analytical techniques such as mass spectrometry and exploring biomedical engineering applications. This multidisciplinary approach supports studies in space health, molecular biology adaptations to microgravity, and innovations in biomedical research technologies.

Best Publications

  • Photo-oxidation of Organic Matter in Sea Water by Ultra-violet Radiation, Analytical and Other Applications

    F. A. J. Armstrong;P. M. Williams;J. D. H. Strickland

  • Immobilization of Protein Molecules onto Homogeneous and Mixed Carboxylate-Terminated Self-Assembled Monolayers

    Nikin Patel;Martyn C. Davies;Mark Hartshorne;Richard J. Heaton

  • Detection of antigen-antibody binding events with the atomic force microscope.

    Stephanie Allen;Xinyong Chen;John Davies;Martyn C. Davies

  • Single-Molecule Studies of Protein Folding

    Alessandro Borgia;Philip M. Williams;Jane Clarke

  • Spatially controlled cell engineering on biodegradable polymer surfaces

    Nikin Patel;Robert Padera;Robert Padera;Giles H. W. Sanders;Scott M. Cannizzaro;Scott M. Cannizzaro

  • Hidden complexity in the mechanical properties of titin

    Philip M. Williams;Susan B. Fowler;Robert B. Best;José Luis Toca-Herrera;José Luis Toca-Herrera

  • Interactions of 3T3 fibroblasts and endothelial cells with defined pore features

    A. K. Salem;R. Stevens;R. G. Pearson;M. C. Davies

  • Carbon-13: carbon-12 ratios in dissolved and particulate organic matter in the sea

    P.M. Williams;L.I. Gordon

  • Natural Radiocarbon Activity of the Dissolved Organic Carbon in the North-east Pacific Ocean

    P. M. Williams;H. Oeschger;P. Kinney

  • Blind reconstruction of scanning probe image data

    P. M. Williams;K. M. Shakesheff;M. C. Davies;D. E. Jackson

  • Sea surface chemistry: organic carbon and organic and inorganic nitrogen and phosphorus in surface films and subsurface waters

    P.M. Williams

  • Direct real-time molecular scale visualisation of the degradation of condensed DNA complexes exposed to DNase I.

    Hosam G. Abdelhady;Stephanie Allen;Martyn C. Davies;Clive J. Roberts

  • The effect of poly(ethylene glycol) molecular architecture on cellular interaction and uptake of DNA complexes

    Mangesh C. Deshpande;Martyn C. Davies;Martin C. Garnett;Philip M. Williams

  • Analytical descriptions of dynamic force spectroscopy: behaviour of multiple connections

    Philip M. Williams

  • Mechanical unfolding of TNfn3: the unfolding pathway of a fnIII domain probed by protein engineering, AFM and MD simulation.

    Sean P. Ng;Ross W.S. Rounsevell;Annette Steward;Christian D. Geierhaas

  • Interpretation of tapping mode atomic force microscopy data using amplitude-phase-distance measurements

    X. Chen;M.C. Davies;C.J. Roberts;S.J.B. Tendler

  • Observation of DNA-polymer condensate formation in real time at a molecular level.

    A.L. Martin;M.C. Davies;B.J. Rackstraw;C.J. Roberts

  • Synthesis and Characterisation of a Degradable Poly(lactic acid)−Poly(ethylene glycol) Copolymer with Biotinylated End Groups

    A. K. Salem;S. M. Cannizzaro;M. C. Davies;S. J. B. Tendler

  • Approaches to the immobilization of proteins at surfaces for analysis by scanning tunneling microscopy

    G. J. Leggett;C. J. Roberts;P. M. Williams;M. C. Davies

  • Microspheres for targeting drugs to specific body sites

    S.S. Davis;L. Ilium;S.M. Moghimi;M.C. Davies

Frequent Co-Authors

Clive J. Roberts
Clive J. Roberts University of Nottingham
Martyn C. Davies
Martyn C. Davies University of Nottingham
Saul J. B. Tendler
Saul J. B. Tendler University of Nottingham
Kevin M. Shakesheff
Kevin M. Shakesheff University of Nottingham
Morgan R. Alexander
Morgan R. Alexander University of Nottingham
Molly M. Stevens
Molly M. Stevens University of Oxford
Paul Williams
Paul Williams University of Nottingham
Abraham J. Domb
Abraham J. Domb Hebrew University of Jerusalem

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Chemistry in the USA opens doors to a variety of exciting career paths, many of which can be enhanced through specialized online degrees. For instance, those interested in the pharmaceutical industry might explore becoming a pharmaceutical sales representative. Understanding how much do pharmaceutical reps make can help gauge the financial potential of this dynamic role.

Another lucrative option is pursuing a career as a pharmacist. With a deep knowledge of chemistry, pharmacists play a critical role in healthcare. Prospective students curious about the profession should consider reviewing the typical pharmacist salary to better understand long-term earnings.

For those interested in forensic applications of chemistry, an online forensic science degree provides flexible learning pathways. These programs prepare graduates for roles in criminal investigations and lab work, making them a practical choice. Exploring affordable options, such as those outlined in online forensic science degree programs, can make this career accessible.

Additionally, the field of forensic pathology offers specialized roles like autopsy technicians. Those curious about this path should consider both the education requirements and how much do autopsy techs make to determine if it fits their ambitions and financial goals.

Best Scientists Citing Philip M. Williams

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles