World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Electronics and Electrical Engineering 43 3926 3769 1412 1318 115 6939

Philip J. Pietraski publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Philip J. Pietraski between 1992 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Philip J. Pietraski published across 34 years, from 1992 to 2025, averaging 5.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 19 publications in 2011. 5 of the 173 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1992 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 19. Peak 19 publications in 2011. 1992: 1 publication 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 0 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 0 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 7 publications 2004: 8 publications 2005: 14 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 16 publications 2010: 15 publications 2011: 19 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 13 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 3 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 2 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 2 publications 2024: 1 publication 2025: 4 publications
1992 2025

173 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Philip J. Pietraski: publications per year, 1992 to 2025
Year Publications
1992 1
1993 0
1994 0
1995 0
1996 1
1997 0
1998 3
1999 3
2000 1
2001 0
2002 1
2003 7
2004 8
2005 14
2006 7
2007 8
2008 5
2009 16
2010 15
2011 19
2012 6
2013 4
2014 13
2015 9
2016 6
2017 6
2018 6
2019 3
2020 2
2021 2
2022 0
2023 2
2024 1
2025 4
Total 173
Download as CSV

Philip J. Pietraski publication distribution in Electronics and Electrical Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Electronics and Electrical Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip J. Pietraski sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 53 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 34–53 to 1,065+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 445. Most scientists, 445, have 174–193 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,065 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 114–133 publications, is where this scientist sits. 34–53 publications: 24 scientists 54–73 publications: 52 scientists 74–93 publications: 114 scientists 94–113 publications: 203 scientists 114–133 publications: 269 scientists 134–153 publications: 355 scientists 154–173 publications: 403 scientists 174–193 publications: 445 scientists 194–213 publications: 430 scientists 214–233 publications: 431 scientists 234–253 publications: 399 scientists 254–273 publications: 366 scientists 274–293 publications: 335 scientists 294–313 publications: 300 scientists 314–333 publications: 276 scientists 334–353 publications: 250 scientists 354–373 publications: 214 scientists 374–393 publications: 187 scientists 394–413 publications: 152 scientists 414–433 publications: 169 scientists 434–453 publications: 147 scientists 454–473 publications: 111 scientists 474–493 publications: 117 scientists 494–513 publications: 103 scientists 514–533 publications: 99 scientists 534–553 publications: 92 scientists 554–573 publications: 75 scientists 574–593 publications: 58 scientists 594–613 publications: 69 scientists 614–633 publications: 50 scientists 634–653 publications: 62 scientists 654–673 publications: 54 scientists 674–693 publications: 44 scientists 694–713 publications: 37 scientists 714–733 publications: 28 scientists 734–753 publications: 26 scientists 754–773 publications: 26 scientists 774–793 publications: 19 scientists 794–813 publications: 23 scientists 814–833 publications: 20 scientists 834–853 publications: 16 scientists 854–873 publications: 20 scientists 874–893 publications: 11 scientists 894–913 publications: 11 scientists 914–933 publications: 16 scientists 934–953 publications: 13 scientists 954–973 publications: 10 scientists 974–993 publications: 11 scientists 994–1,013 publications: 9 scientists 1,014–1,033 publications: 9 scientists 1,034–1,053 publications: 10 scientists 1,054–1,064 publications: 6 scientists 1,065+ publications: 99 scientists
34–53 publications 1,065+

This scientist: 115 publications — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,065 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Electronics and Electrical Engineering scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,875 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
34–53 24
54–73 52
74–93 114
94–113 203
114–133 269 115
134–153 355
154–173 403
174–193 445
194–213 430
214–233 431
234–253 399
254–273 366
274–293 335
294–313 300
314–333 276
334–353 250
354–373 214
374–393 187
394–413 152
414–433 169
434–453 147
454–473 111
474–493 117
494–513 103
514–533 99
534–553 92
554–573 75
574–593 58
594–613 69
614–633 50
634–653 62
654–673 54
674–693 44
694–713 37
714–733 28
734–753 26
754–773 26
774–793 19
794–813 23
814–833 20
834–853 16
854–873 20
874–893 11
894–913 11
914–933 16
934–953 13
954–973 10
974–993 11
994–1,013 9
1,014–1,033 9
1,034–1,053 10
1,054–1,064 6
1,065+ 99
Download as CSV

Philip J. Pietraski D-index placement in Electronics and Electrical Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Electronics and Electrical Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip J. Pietraski sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 82 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 111+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 263. Most scientists, 263, have 32 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 111 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 178 scientists 31 D-Index: 257 scientists 32 D-Index: 263 scientists 33 D-Index: 262 scientists 34 D-Index: 244 scientists 35 D-Index: 236 scientists 36 D-Index: 211 scientists 37 D-Index: 220 scientists 38 D-Index: 214 scientists 39 D-Index: 214 scientists 40 D-Index: 205 scientists 41 D-Index: 187 scientists 42 D-Index: 194 scientists 43 D-Index: 201 scientists 44 D-Index: 155 scientists 45 D-Index: 189 scientists 46 D-Index: 148 scientists 47 D-Index: 160 scientists 48 D-Index: 134 scientists 49 D-Index: 130 scientists 50 D-Index: 141 scientists 51 D-Index: 156 scientists 52 D-Index: 108 scientists 53 D-Index: 130 scientists 54 D-Index: 112 scientists 55 D-Index: 97 scientists 56 D-Index: 111 scientists 57 D-Index: 102 scientists 58 D-Index: 108 scientists 59 D-Index: 120 scientists 60 D-Index: 103 scientists 61 D-Index: 93 scientists 62 D-Index: 92 scientists 63 D-Index: 74 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 73 scientists 66 D-Index: 64 scientists 67 D-Index: 69 scientists 68 D-Index: 60 scientists 69 D-Index: 39 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 59 scientists 72 D-Index: 46 scientists 73 D-Index: 49 scientists 74 D-Index: 38 scientists 75 D-Index: 35 scientists 76 D-Index: 32 scientists 77 D-Index: 35 scientists 78 D-Index: 31 scientists 79 D-Index: 22 scientists 80 D-Index: 34 scientists 81 D-Index: 31 scientists 82 D-Index: 34 scientists 83 D-Index: 23 scientists 84 D-Index: 18 scientists 85 D-Index: 30 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 20 scientists 89 D-Index: 8 scientists 90 D-Index: 17 scientists 91 D-Index: 7 scientists 92 D-Index: 14 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 10 scientists 98 D-Index: 10 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 16 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 8 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 13 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 5 scientists 109 D-Index: 10 scientists 110 D-Index: 8 scientists 111+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 111+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 111 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Electronics and Electrical Engineering scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,875 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 178
31 257
32 263
33 262
34 244
35 236
36 211
37 220
38 214
39 214
40 205
41 187
42 194
43 201 43
44 155
45 189
46 148
47 160
48 134
49 130
50 141
51 156
52 108
53 130
54 112
55 97
56 111
57 102
58 108
59 120
60 103
61 93
62 92
63 74
64 77
65 73
66 64
67 69
68 60
69 39
70 57
71 59
72 46
73 49
74 38
75 35
76 32
77 35
78 31
79 22
80 34
81 31
82 34
83 23
84 18
85 30
86 19
87 19
88 20
89 8
90 17
91 7
92 14
93 9
94 15
95 10
96 12
97 10
98 10
99 12
100 16
101 5
102 7
103 7
104 8
105 9
106 13
107 4
108 5
109 10
110 8
111+ 96
Download as CSV

Overview

Philip J. Pietraski is affiliated with InterDigital in the United States. Their research contributions primarily span engineering and computer science, with a strong focus on electrical and electronic engineering as well as specialized topics within artificial intelligence, signal processing, and computer networks and communications.

Their scholarly work includes multiple publications in notable venues such as arXiv (Cornell University), IEEE Access, and the IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing. The recent papers reflect a concentration on wireless communication technologies and data-driven methods for radio systems.

  • Soft-Decoding for Multi-Set Space-Time Shift-Keying mmWave Systems: A Deep Learning Approach (2020, IEEE Access)
  • SignCRF: Scalable Channel-Agnostic Data-Driven Radio Authentication System (2025, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing)
  • SignCRF: Scalable Channel-agnostic Data-driven Radio Authentication System (2023, arXiv (Cornell University))
  • Unsupervised Learning for Pilot-free Transmission in 3GPP MIMO Systems (2023, arXiv (Cornell University))

Their frequent collaborators include the following scientists, highlighting consistent partnerships in research:

  • Amani Al-Shawabka
  • Sudhir B Pattar
  • Pedram Johari
  • Tommaso Melodia
  • K. Satyanarayana

Philip J. Pietraski's research is concentrated on advanced wireless communication techniques, especially in the areas of millimeter-wave propagation and modeling, full-duplex wireless communications, and wireless signal modulation classification. Their work additionally spans several aspects of speech and audio processing and wireless communication networks research.

  • Advanced Wireless Communication Techniques
  • Millimeter-Wave Propagation and Modeling
  • Advanced Wireless Communication Technologies
  • Wireless Signal Modulation Classification
  • Speech and Audio Processing
  • Full-Duplex Wireless Communications
  • Wireless Communication Networks Research

Philip J. Pietraski's research profile is marked by participation in interdisciplinary studies intersecting engineering and computational methods. The integration of deep learning and data-driven techniques within wireless system design and authentication underscores a focus on innovative communication technology development.

Best Publications

  • UPLINK CHANNEL CONTROL INFORMATION SIGNALING IN LTE-A

    Bala Erdem;Pietraski Philip J;Shin Sung-Hyuk;Zhang Guodong

  • WTRU application, method of WTRU application used for executing carrier aggregation, and WTRU

    Bala Erdem;Zhang Guodong;Pietraski Philip J;Shin Sung-Hyuk

  • WIRELESS OPERATION IN UNLICENSED SPECTRUM

    Kaur Samian;Bala Erdem;Deng Tao;Shah Kandarp

  • Method for uplink power control on a wireless transmitter/receiver unit (WTRU) and WTRU

    Shin Sung-Hyuk;Zhang Guodong;Stern-Berkowitz Janet A;Pietraski Philip J

  • Method used for calculating power allowance and wireless transmitting/ receiving unit

    Zhang Guodong;Bala Erdem;Pietraski Philip J;Shin Sung-Hyuk

  • Wireless transmission and receiving unit (WTRU) and method

    Wang Carl S;Li Kai;Movva Sasidhar;Pietraski Philip J

  • Method and apparatus for integrating different radio access technologies using carrier aggregation

    Ravikumar V. Pragada;Samian Kaur;Douglas R. Castor;Philip J. Pietraski

  • TRANSMITTING CONTROL INFORMATION FOR CARRIER AGGREGATED SPECTRUMS

    Kyle Jung-lin Pan;Philip J. Pietraski;Jean-louis Gauvreau

  • METHOD AND DEVICE OF RECONFIGURATION SPECIALIZED TO COMPONENT CARRIER

    Zhang Guodong;Pan Kyle Jung-Lin;Jean-Louis Gauvreau;Terry Stephen E

  • Method and apparatus for wireless communications

    Pan Kyle Jung-Lin;Gauvreau Jean-Louis;Zhang Guodong;Pietraski Philip J

  • Method and apparatus for enhancing cell-edge user performance and signaling radio link failure conditions via downlink cooperative component carriers

    Philip J. Pietraski;Rui Yang;Kai Li;Carl Wang

  • Harq process utilization in multiple carrier wireless communications

    Benoit Pelletier;Jean-Louis Gauvreau;Diana Pani;Christopher R. Cave

  • Mobile station with improved channel quality prediction for wireless communications

    Philip J. Pietraski

  • Method and device for handover of a communication link from a primary beam

    Roy Arnab;Pragada Ravikumar;Pietraski Philip J;Viswanathan Bharath

  • Reference signal configuration

    Guodong Zhang;Joseph S. Levy;Philip J. Pietraski;Janet A. Stern-Berkowitz

  • Reconfiguration and handover procedures for fuzzy cells

    Samian J. Kaur;Philip J. Pietraski;Ana Lucia A. Pinheiro;Stephen E. Terry

  • Wireless device for controlling transmission power

    Sung-Hyuk Shin;Philip J. Pietraski;Vincent Roy;Guodong Zhang

  • Method and apparatus for subcarrier and antenna selection in MIMO-OFDM system

    Fatih M. Ozluturk;Philip J. Pietraski;Aykut Bultan

  • Detection, avoidance and/or correction of problematic puncturing patterns in parity bit streams used when implementing turbo codes

    Philip J. Pietraski;Gregory S. Sternberg

  • Method for controlling signaling executed by WTRU, and WTRU

    Deng Tao;Deenoo Yugeswar;Pietraski Philip J;Pragada Ravikumar

Frequent Co-Authors

Kyle Jung-Lin Pan
Kyle Jung-Lin Pan InterDigital (United States)
Janet A. Stern-Berkowitz
Janet A. Stern-Berkowitz InterDigital (United States)
Eldad Zeira
Eldad Zeira Leucadia Wireless
Marian Rudolf
Marian Rudolf InterDigital (United States)
Guodong Zhang
Guodong Zhang InterDigital (United States)
Alexander Reznik
Alexander Reznik Hewlett Packard Enterprise (United States)
Samian Kaur
Samian Kaur InterDigital (United States)
Peter S. Wang
Peter S. Wang InterDigital (United States)
Paul Marinier
Paul Marinier InterDigital (United States)
Robert L. Olesen
Robert L. Olesen InterDigital (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in advancing their knowledge in Electronics and Electrical Engineering, exploring diverse online educational options is essential. One growing trend is the what is a competency based masters degree, which allows students to progress based on skills and mastery rather than time spent in class. This approach can accelerate learning and tailor the experience to individual strengths.

Military spouses and dependents often face unique challenges when pursuing education. Thankfully, there are specific options available highlighted by the best online college for military spouses, providing flexible and supportive environments to balance career development with personal commitments.

For those who want to start their educational journey without delay, many institutions offer flexible admissions such as online colleges starting this month. These options help students jump into relevant courses quickly, ensuring continuous momentum toward their goals.

If immediate workforce entry is a priority, consider short certificate programs that pay well online. These condensed programs offer focused training in key technical skills, equipping learners to secure high-demand positions in a short timeframe.

Best Scientists Citing Philip J. Pietraski

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles