World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
83
Citations
34987
World Ranking
300
National Ranking
135

Philip J. Leaf publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip J. Leaf sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 194 publications — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Philip J. Leaf D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip J. Leaf sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 83 D-Index — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Philip J. Leaf is affiliated with Johns Hopkins University in the United States. Their research spans several areas within social sciences and medicine, with a focus on topics such as terrorism, counterterrorism, political violence, suicide and self-harm studies, gun ownership and violence research, smoking behavior and cessation, substance abuse treatment and outcomes, alcohol consumption and health effects, and healthcare professionals' stress and burnout.

Their recent publications include:

  • Second Victims: Aftermath of Gun Violence and Faith-Based Responses (2020, Journal of Religion and Health)
  • Using Zoning as a Public Health Tool to Reduce Alcohol Outlet Oversaturation, Promote Compliance, and Guide Future Enforcement: a Preliminary Analysis of Transform Baltimore (2020, Journal of Urban Health)
  • The use of propensity scores to assess the generalizability of results from randomized trials (2020, UNC Libraries)
  • Health Care Workers and Burnout: A Cross-Sectional Study (2025, AJN American Journal of Nursing)

Philip J. Leaf has collaborated with several frequent co-authors, including Panagis Galiatsatos, Thomas Cudjoe, Jerrell Bratcher, Peter Heikkinen, and Sherita Hill Golden.

Their work has been published primarily in the following venues:

  • Journal of Religion and Health
  • Journal of Urban Health
  • UNC Libraries
  • AJN American Journal of Nursing

The main fields of study they contribute to are social sciences and medicine, with subfields including sociology and political science, clinical psychology, health, physiology, and epidemiology.

Philip J. Leaf's research addresses a broad range of public health and social issues, often focusing on the intersections of health outcomes and societal factors. Subjects such as violence, addiction, mental health, and stress among healthcare professionals are recurrent elements in their academic output.

Best Publications

  • Multiple Imputation by Chained Equations: What is it and how does it work?

    Melissa J. Azur;Elizabeth A. Stuart;Constantine Frangakis;Philip J. Leaf

  • The epidemiology of co-occurring addictive and mental disorders: implications for prevention and service utilization.

    Ronald C. Kessler;M.P.H. Christopher B. Nelson Ph.D.;Katherine A. McGonagle;J B S Mark Edlund

  • Examining the Overlap in Internet Harassment and School Bullying: Implications for School Intervention

    Michele L. Ybarra;Marie Diener-West;Philip J. Leaf

  • Examining the Effects of Schoolwide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports on Student Outcomes: Results from a Randomized Controlled Effectiveness Trial in Elementary Schools.

    Catherine P. Bradshaw;Mary M. Mitchell;Philip J. Leaf

  • Affective disorders in five United States communities.

    Myrna M. Weissman;Philip J. Leaf;Gary L. Tischler;Dan G. Blazer

  • Feasibility and preliminary outcomes of a school-based mindfulness intervention for urban youth

    Tamar Mendelson;Mark T. Greenberg;Jacinda K. Dariotis;Laura Feagans Gould

  • Maximizing the Implementation Quality of Evidence-Based Preventive Interventions in Schools: A Conceptual Framework

    Celene E. Domitrovich;Catherine P. Bradshaw;Jeanne M. Poduska;Kimberly Hoagwood

  • A Multilevel Study of Predictors of Student Perceptions of School Climate: The Effect of Classroom-Level Factors

    Christine W. Koth;Catherine P. Bradshaw;Philip J. Leaf

  • Mental health service use in the community and schools: Results from the four-community MECA study

    Philip J. Leaf;Margarita Alegria;Patricia Cohen;Sherryl H. Goodman

  • Barriers to children's mental health services.

    Pamela L. Owens;Kimberly Hoagwood;Sarah M. Horwitz;Philip J. Leaf

  • Altering school climate through school-wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports: findings from a group-randomized effectiveness trial.

    Catherine Pilcher Bradshaw;Christine W. Koth;Leslie A. Thornton;Philip J. Leaf

  • Past-Year Use of Outpatient Services for Psychiatric Problems in the National Comorbidity Survey

    Ronald C. Kessler;Shanyang Zhao;Steven J. Katz;Anthony C. Kouzis

  • The impact of school-wide positive behavioral interventions and supports (PBIS) on the organizational health of elementary schools.

    Catherine P. Bradshaw;Christine W. Koth;Katherine B. Bevans;Nicholas Ialongo

  • Poverty and Psychiatric Status: Longitudinal Evidence From the New Haven Epidemiologic Catchment Area Study

    Martha Livingston Bruce;David T. Takeuchi;Philip J. Leaf

  • Effects of School-Wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports on Child Behavior Problems

    Catherine Pilcher Bradshaw;Tracy Evian Waasdorp;Philip J. Leaf

  • Multilevel Exploration of Factors Contributing to the Overrepresentation of Black Students in Office Disciplinary Referrals

    Catherine P. Bradshaw;Mary M. Mitchell;Lindsey M. O'Brennan;Philip J. Leaf

  • The use of propensity scores to assess the generalizability of results from randomized trials

    Elizabeth A. Stuart;Stephen R. Cole;Catherine P. Bradshaw;Philip J. Leaf

  • Racial differences in attitudes toward professional mental health care and in the use of services

    M.P.H. Chamberlain Diala Ph.D.;Carles Muntaner M.D.;Christine Walrath;Kim J. Nickerson

  • Student and Teacher Perceptions of School Climate: A Multilevel Exploration of Patterns of Discrepancy

    Mary M. Mitchell;Catherine P. Bradshaw;Philip J. Leaf

  • Implementation of School-Wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS) in Elementary Schools: Observations from a Randomized Trial

    Catherine Pilcher Bradshaw;Wendy M. Reinke;Louis D. Brown;Katherine B. Bevans

  • Mental health in pediatric settings: distribution of disorders and factors related to service use.

    Margaret J. Briggs-Gowan;Sarah Mc Cue Horwitz;Mary E. Schwab-Stone;John M. Leventhal

Frequent Co-Authors

Catherine P. Bradshaw
Catherine P. Bradshaw University of Virginia
Sarah M. Horwitz
Sarah M. Horwitz New York University
Nicholas S. Ialongo
Nicholas S. Ialongo Johns Hopkins University
Michele L. Ybarra
Michele L. Ybarra Johns Hopkins University
Darrel A. Regier
Darrel A. Regier University of British Columbia
Elizabeth A. Stuart
Elizabeth A. Stuart Johns Hopkins University
Tracy Evian Waasdorp
Tracy Evian Waasdorp Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Ronald C. Kessler
Ronald C. Kessler Harvard University
Richard G. Frank
Richard G. Frank Harvard University
Sherryl H. Goodman
Sherryl H. Goodman Emory University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring social sciences and humanities in the USA opens doors to a wide range of online degrees and specialized career tracks. With flexible learning options, students can tailor their studies to fit busy lifestyles and diverse interests.

Aspiring clinical psychologists can consider psyd online programs that prepare graduates for advanced practice in mental health settings. For those drawn to family therapy and counseling, online mft degrees provide a streamlined path to licensure and hands-on experience, often on an accelerated timeline.

If affordability is a top concern, students can explore the cheapest online master's in psychology, ensuring a high-quality education without excessive debt. Additionally, professionals seeking leadership in education may benefit from edd online programs that offer fast-track options to reach career goals sooner.

Each pathway offers unique advantages, from practical skills to lower tuition costs, and is designed to help you advance in fields such as social work, education, counseling, and psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Philip J. Leaf

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles