World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 49 2865 2619 491 445 212 16623

Petra Meier publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Petra Meier between 1998 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Petra Meier published across 28 years, from 1998 to 2025, averaging 9.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 23 publications in 2016. 27 of the 257 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1998 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 23. Peak 23 publications in 2016. 1998: 1 publication 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 11 publications 2011: 11 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 19 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 23 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 14 publications 2019: 15 publications 2020: 11 publications 2021: 23 publications 2022: 20 publications 2023: 21 publications 2024: 19 publications 2025: 8 publications
1998 2025

257 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Petra Meier: publications per year, 1998 to 2025
Year Publications
1998 1
1999 0
2000 0
2001 2
2002 0
2003 3
2004 3
2005 3
2006 5
2007 2
2008 4
2009 4
2010 11
2011 11
2012 7
2013 9
2014 19
2015 8
2016 23
2017 11
2018 14
2019 15
2020 11
2021 23
2022 20
2023 21
2024 19
2025 8
Total 257
Download as CSV

Petra Meier publications per year - data summary

  • Petra Meier, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from University of Glasgow, has 257 publications recorded across 28 years, from 1998 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1998 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive years are 2016 and 2021, with 23 publications each.
  • The least productive year with any output is 1998, with 1 publication.
  • 3 of the 28 years in the span carry no publications at all (1999, 2000 and 2002).
  • The rate of publication averages 9.2 papers per year over the whole span, or 10.3 per year counting only the 25 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 91 publications, 35% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1998-2007: 19 publications (1.9 per year); 2008-2017: 107 publications (10.7 per year); 2018-2025: 131 publications (16.4 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Petra Meier publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Petra Meier sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 204–213 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 212 publications — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285 212
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Petra Meier publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 7,777 Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 54 ranges running from 44–53 to 570+ publications.
  • Petra Meier, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from University of Glasgow, records 212 publications - the 69th percentile of the discipline.
  • 69% of ranked Social Sciences and Humanities scientists score the same or lower than Petra Meier, and about 31% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 164–173 publications range, and Petra Meier ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 114–123 publications, holding 474 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 57% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 174–183 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 570 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Petra Meier D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Petra Meier sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 49 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186 49
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Petra Meier D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 7,777 Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 71 ranges running from 30 to 100+ D-Index.
  • Petra Meier, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from University of Glasgow, records 49 D-Index - the 64th percentile of the discipline.
  • 64% of ranked Social Sciences and Humanities scientists score the same or lower than Petra Meier, and about 36% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 45 D-Index range, and Petra Meier ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 42 D-Index, holding 313 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 59% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 47 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more, 97 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Research.com Recognitions

  • Fellow of the Academy of Social Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Fellow of the Academy of Social Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Fellow of the Academy of Social Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Fellow of the Academy of Social Sciences, United Kingdom

Overview

Petra Meier is affiliated with the University of Glasgow in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans topics within medicine and health professions, with a particular focus on substance abuse treatment and outcomes, health disparities and outcomes, and homelessness and social issues.

Their recent scholarly contributions include several papers published between 2020 and 2023. Notable works are:

  • Evaluation of public health interventions from a complex systems perspective: A research methods review, 2021, Social Science & Medicine
  • Causal mechanisms proposed for the alcohol harm paradox-a systematic review, 2021, Addiction
  • Call for transparency of COVID-19 models, 2020, Science
  • The public health implications of the cost-of-living crisis: outlining mechanisms and modelling consequences, 2023, The Lancet Regional Health - Europe
  • Economics for people and planet-moving beyond the neoclassical paradigm, 2022, The Lancet Planetary Health

Petra Meier frequently collaborates with several researchers including John Holmes, Colin Angus, Abigail K. Stevely, Alan Brennan, and Alessandro Sasso.

Their research has been published in a variety of venues, with multiple publications in:

  • Drug and Alcohol Review
  • Addiction
  • Social Science & Medicine
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • BMC Public Health

Their expertise is distributed across several subfields such as General Health Professions, Epidemiology, Health, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, and Economics and Econometrics.

Within these domains, their main topics of work include:

  • Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health disparities and outcomes
  • Homelessness and Social Issues
  • Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
  • Global Health Care Issues
  • Employment and Welfare Studies
  • Demographic modeling and climate adaptation

Petra Meier has been recognized as a Fellow of the Academy of Social Sciences, United Kingdom.

Best Publications

  • Prevention of cardiovascular events and death with pravastatin in patients with coronary heart disease and a broad range of initial cholesterol levels

    A. Tonkin;P. Alyward;D. Colquhoun;P. Glasziou

  • The role of the therapeutic alliance in the treatment of substance misuse: a critical review of the literature.

    Petra S. Meier;Christine Barrowclough;Michael C. Donmall

  • Barriers and facilitators to implementing screening and brief intervention for alcohol misuse: a systematic review of qualitative evidence

    M. Johnson;R. Jackson;L. Guillaume;P. Meier

  • Effects of minimum unit pricing for alcohol on different income and socioeconomic groups: a modelling study

    John Holmes;Yang Meng;Petra S Meier;Alan Brennan

  • Estimated effect of alcohol pricing policies on health and health economic outcomes in England: an epidemiological model

    Robin C Purshouse;Petra S Meier;Alan Brennan;Karl B Taylor

  • Policy options for alcohol price regulation: the importance of modelling population heterogeneity

    Petra Sylvia Meier;Robin Purshouse;Alan Brennan

  • The role of the early therapeutic alliance in predicting drug treatment dropout.

    Petra S. Meier;Michael C. Donmall;Patrick McElduff;Christine Barrowclough

  • Estimated Effects of Different Alcohol Taxation and Price Policies on Health Inequalities: A Mathematical Modelling Study

    Petra S. Meier;John Holmes;Colin Angus;Abdallah K. Ally

  • Disease burden and costs from excess alcohol consumption, obesity, and viral hepatitis: Fourth report of the Lancet Standing Commission on Liver Disease in the UK

    Roger Williams;Graeme Alexander;Iain Armstrong;Alastair Baker

  • All drinking is not equal: how a social practice theory lens could enhance public health research on alcohol and other health behaviours

    Petra Sylvia Meier;Alan Warde;John Holmes

  • Trend analysis and modelling of gender-specific age, period and birth cohort effects on alcohol abstention and consumption level for drinkers in Great Britain using the General Lifestyle Survey 1984–2009

    Yang Meng;John Holmes;Daniel Hill-McManus;Alan Brennan

  • Predicting the early therapeutic alliance in the treatment of drug misuse

    Petra S. Meier;Michael C. Donmall;Christine Barrowclough;Patrick McElduff

  • Unravelling the alcohol harm paradox: a population-based study of social gradients across very heavy drinking thresholds

    Dan Lewer;Petra Meier;Emma Beard;Sadie Boniface

  • Independent review of the effects of alcohol pricing and promotion: Part A. Systematic Reviews.

    Petra Meier

  • The temporal relationship between per capita alcohol consumption and harm: a systematic review of time lag specifications in aggregate time series analyses.

    John Holmes;Petra S. Meier;Andrew Booth;Yelan Guo

  • Estimation of own and cross price elasticities of alcohol demand in the UK--A pseudo-panel approach using the Living Costs and Food Survey 2001-2009.

    Yang Meng;Alan Brennan;Robin Purshouse;Daniel Hill-McManus

  • The public health implications of the cost-of-living crisis: outlining mechanisms and modelling consequences

    Unknown

  • Developing a social practice-based typology of British drinking culture in 2009-2011: Implications for alcohol policy analysis

    Abdallah K. Ally;Melanie Lovatt;Petra S. Meier;Alan Brennan

  • Call for transparency of COVID-19 models.

    C. Michael Barton;Marina Alberti;Daniel Ames;Jo An Atkinson

  • The impact of spatial and temporal availability of alcohol on its consumption and related harms: A critical review in the context of UK licensing policies

    John Holmes;Yelan Guo;Ravi Maheswaran;James Nicholls

Frequent Co-Authors

John Holmes
John Holmes University of Sheffield
Alan Brennan
Alan Brennan University of Sheffield
Susan Michie
Susan Michie University College London
Jamie Brown
Jamie Brown University College London
Charles D. H. Parry
Charles D. H. Parry South African Medical Research Council
Eileen Kaner
Eileen Kaner Newcastle University
Anne Lingford-Hughes
Anne Lingford-Hughes Imperial College London
Emanuela Lombardo
Emanuela Lombardo Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa
Anne Marie MacKintosh
Anne Marie MacKintosh University of Stirling
Christine Barrowclough
Christine Barrowclough University of Manchester

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring the Social Sciences and Humanities opens doors to diverse professional opportunities. Whether you are interested in direct client care, research, counseling, or therapy, a variety of online degree options can help accelerate your career. For example, those seeking a quick path to clinical social work may consider accelerated msw online programs, which allow you to earn a Master of Social Work in a condensed timeframe without sacrificing quality.

If your goal is to quickly gain credentials in psychology, a fast track bachelor degree in psychology provides a streamlined option to enter fields such as human services, case management, or organizational consulting.

For students drawn to mental health counseling, enrolling in cacrep schools ensures your counseling program meets national standards—an important consideration for licensure and employment.

Aspiring therapists can also pursue a masters in marriage and family therapy online, preparing for impactful work with individuals, couples, and families.

These flexible online degrees cater to different interests and schedules, helping students advance in meaningful social sciences and humanities careers.

Best Scientists Citing Petra Meier

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles