World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
38
Citations
8866
World Ranking
6515
National Ranking
516

Peter Gell publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Gell sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 149 publications — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Peter Gell D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Gell sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Peter Gell is affiliated with Federation University Australia and focuses on research within Environmental Science, contributing extensively to this field with 67 publications. Their work spans several key subfields including Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Global and Planetary Change, Atmospheric Science, and Environmental Chemistry.

Their research addresses various scientific topics, mainly concentrating on Fish Ecology and Management Studies, Coastal Wetland Ecosystem Dynamics, Geology and Paleoclimatology Research, Land Use and Ecosystem Services, Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies, Freshwater Macroinvertebrate Diversity and Ecology, and Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management.

Peter Gell has published in multiple venues, with frequent contributions to Marine and Freshwater Research, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, Forest Ecology and Management, Pacific Conservation Biology, and BIO Web of Conferences.

Some of their recent notable papers include the following:

  • Using long-term data to inform a decision pathway for restoration of ecosystem resilience, 2021, Anthropocene
  • Community structure and ecological responses to hydrological changes in benthic algal assemblages in a regulated river: application of algal metrics and multivariate techniques in river management, 2021, Environmental Science and Pollution Research
  • Application of portable gas chromatography-mass spectrometer for rapid field based determination of TCE in soil vapour and groundwater, 2020, Environmental Technology & Innovation
  • The carbon stock potential of the restored mangrove ecosystem of Pasarbanggi, Rembang, Central Java, 2023, Marine Environmental Research
  • Continuing the discussion about ecological futures for the lower Murray River (Australia) in the Anthropocene, 2021, Marine and Freshwater Research

Frequent collaborators in their research include C. Max Finlayson, Tri Retnaningsih Soeprobowati, Keely Mills, Nick C. Davidson, and Lindsey Gillson.

Best Publications

  • Emerging threats and persistent conservation challenges for freshwater biodiversity

    Andrea J. Reid;Andrew K. Carlson;Irena F. Creed;Erika J. Eliason

  • A global perspective on wetland salinization: ecological consequences of a growing threat to freshwater wetlands

    Ellen R. Herbert;Paul Boon;Amy J. Burgin;Scott C. Neubauer

  • Looking forward through the past: Identification of 50 priority research questions in palaeoecology

    Alistair W. R. Seddon;Alistair W. R. Seddon;Anson W. Mackay;Ambroise G. Baker;H. John B. Birks;H. John B. Birks;H. John B. Birks

  • Regime shifts, thresholds and multiple stable states in freshwater ecosystems; a critical appraisal of the evidence.

    Samantha J. Capon;A. Jasmyn J. Lynch;Nick Bond;Bruce C. Chessman;Bruce C. Chessman

  • Diatom-inferred salinity in palaeolakes: An indirect tracer of climate change

    Françoise Gasse;Philip Barker;Peter A. Gell;Sherilyn C. Fritz

  • First human impacts and responses of aquatic systems: A review of palaeolimnological records from around the world

    Nathalie Dubois;Nathalie Dubois;Émilie Saulnier-Talbot;Keely Mills;Peter Gell

  • The use of diatoms to assess past and present water quality

    M. A. Reid;J. C. Tibby;D. Penny;P. A. Gell

  • When trends intersect: The challenge of protecting freshwater ecosystems under multiple land use and hydrological intensification scenarios

    Jenny A. Davis;Anthony P. O'Grady;Allan P. Dale;Angela H. Arthington

  • The status of wetlands and the predicted effects of global climate change: the situation in Australia

    C Finlayson;Jennifer Davis;Peter Gell;Richard Kingsford

  • The Development of a Diatom Database for Inferring Lake Salinity, Western Victoria, Australia: Towards a Quantitative Approach for Reconstructing Past Climates

    Peter A. Gell

  • Seasonal and interannual variations in diatom assemblages in Murray River connected wetlands in north-west Victoria, Australia

    Peter A. Gell;Ian R. Sluiter;Jennie Fluin

  • Accessing limnological change and variability using fossil diatom assemblages, south‐east Australia

    Peter A Gell;John Tibby;Jennie Fluin;Paul Joseph Leahy

  • A diatom species index for bioassessment of Australian rivers

    Bruce C. Chessman;Nina Bate;Peter A. Gell;Peter A. Gell;Peter Newall

  • Social-ecological systems in the Anthropocene: The need for integrating social and biophysical records at regional scales

    JA Dearing;B Acma;S Bub;FM Chambers

  • The enigma of a late Pleistocene wetland in the Flinders Ranges, South Australia

    Martin A Williams;John R Prescott;John Chappell;Donald Adamson

  • Tareena Billabong – a palaeolimnological history of an ever-changing wetland, Chowilla Floodplain, lower Murray–Darling Basin, Australia

    Peter A. Gell;Sorell Bulpin;Peter Wallbrink;Gary Hancock

  • An Illustrated Guide to Common Stream Diatom Species from Temperate Australia

    J. Sonneman;A. Sincock;J. Fluin;M. Reid

  • Palaeolimnological evidence for the independent evolution of neighbouring terminal lakes, the Murray Darling Basin, Australia

    Jennie Fluin;Peter Gell;Deborah Haynes;John Tibby

  • The Role of Substrate Type on Benthic Diatom Assemblages in the Daly and Roper Rivers of the Australian Wet/Dry Tropics

    Simon A. Townsend;Peter A. Gell

  • Anthropogenic acceleration of sediment accretion in lowland floodplain wetlands, Murray–Darling Basin, Australia

    Peter Gell;Jennie Fluin;John Tibby;Gary Hancock

  • First human impacts and responses of aquatic systems

    Nathalie Dubois;Emilie Saulnier-Talbot;Keely Mills;Peter Gell

Frequent Co-Authors

John Tibby
John Tibby University of Adelaide
Gary Hancock
Gary Hancock Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
C. Max Finlayson
C. Max Finlayson Charles Sturt University
Richard W. Battarbee
Richard W. Battarbee University College London
Suzanne McGowan
Suzanne McGowan University of Nottingham
Roger J. Flower
Roger J. Flower University College London
Neil L. Rose
Neil L. Rose University College London
Keith F. Walker
Keith F. Walker University of Adelaide
Jasmine E. Saros
Jasmine E. Saros University of Maine
Helen Bennion
Helen Bennion University College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Ecology and Evolution gives you a strong foundation in the biological sciences, but there are also numerous masters degree in counseling online options to consider. These interdisciplinary pathways let you combine your passion for science with skills in communication, advocacy, and care for both individuals and communities.

If you are interested in the intersection of biology and criminal justice, a forensic psychology degree allows you to explore areas such as behavioral science and criminology. This path is ideal for those curious about applying ecological or evolutionary principles to real-world legal and investigative problems.

For those who wish to work with youth or advocate for the well-being of future generations, consider enrolling in child psychology masters programs. These programs equip graduates to understand developmental processes—an important complement to evolutionary study.

Finally, those seeking affordable and flexible options can find numerous affordable masters in counseling programs online. These degrees open doors to a variety of meaningful careers, allowing you to make an impact in both environmental and human health fields.

Best Scientists Citing Peter Gell

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles