World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Ecology and Evolution 38 6515 6289 516 504 149 8866

Peter Gell publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Peter Gell between 1973 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Peter Gell published across 53 years, from 1973 to 2025, averaging 3.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 2017. 8 of the 171 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1973 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 2017. 1973: 2 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 2 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 0 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 2 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 5 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 12 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 12 publications 2016: 13 publications 2017: 16 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 11 publications 2021: 6 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 15 publications 2024: 1 publication 2025: 7 publications
1973 2025

171 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Peter Gell: publications per year, 1973 to 2025
Year Publications
1973 2
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 1
1994 2
1995 1
1996 0
1997 2
1998 0
1999 0
2000 1
2001 2
2002 3
2003 0
2004 1
2005 5
2006 4
2007 12
2008 2
2009 5
2010 8
2011 5
2012 7
2013 7
2014 7
2015 12
2016 13
2017 16
2018 6
2019 5
2020 11
2021 6
2022 2
2023 15
2024 1
2025 7
Total 171
Download as CSV

Peter Gell publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Gell sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 100 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 37–41 to 531+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 333. Most scientists, 333, have 97–101 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 147–151 publications, is where this scientist sits. 37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37–41 publications 531+

This scientist: 149 publications — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Ecology and Evolution scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 8,381 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
37–41 2
42–46 9
47–51 10
52–56 31
57–61 56
62–66 91
67–71 92
72–76 127
77–81 173
82–86 236
87–91 227
92–96 240
97–101 333
102–106 280
107–111 300
112–116 285
117–121 305
122–126 287
127–131 278
132–136 289
137–141 273
142–146 262
147–151 246 149
152–156 235
157–161 205
162–166 199
167–171 174
172–176 164
177–181 173
182–186 189
187–191 170
192–196 139
197–201 128
202–206 117
207–211 115
212–216 107
217–221 124
222–226 81
227–231 82
232–236 85
237–241 75
242–246 66
247–251 81
252–256 69
257–261 70
262–266 55
267–271 64
272–276 49
277–281 48
282–286 44
287–291 45
292–296 36
297–301 39
302–306 38
307–311 30
312–316 34
317–321 25
322–326 22
327–331 28
332–336 30
337–341 22
342–346 30
347–351 26
352–356 22
357–361 29
362–366 21
367–371 12
372–376 18
377–381 17
382–386 13
387–391 21
392–396 13
397–401 10
402–406 15
407–411 8
412–416 9
417–421 8
422–426 4
427–431 10
432–436 10
437–441 5
442–446 4
447–451 10
452–456 2
457–461 4
462–466 7
467–471 7
472–476 6
477–481 6
482–486 3
487–491 3
492–496 4
497–501 4
502–506 8
507–511 5
512–516 4
517–521 5
522–526 4
527–530 5
531+ 100
Download as CSV

Peter Gell D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Gell sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 92 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 121+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 280. Most scientists, 280, have 40 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 38 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Ecology and Evolution scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 8,381 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 95
31 123
32 191
33 245
34 252
35 244
36 249
37 244
38 254 38
39 254
40 280
41 274
42 266
43 233
44 248
45 208
46 201
47 213
48 207
49 172
50 209
51 199
52 153
53 169
54 163
55 148
56 120
57 146
58 137
59 140
60 104
61 119
62 118
63 99
64 77
65 100
66 86
67 83
68 75
69 94
70 57
71 68
72 59
73 63
74 66
75 60
76 42
77 49
78 39
79 37
80 43
81 41
82 45
83 34
84 40
85 35
86 55
87 24
88 24
89 30
90 23
91 25
92 27
93 27
94 13
95 23
96 12
97 14
98 19
99 16
100 14
101 5
102 21
103 16
104 10
105 7
106 7
107 7
108 6
109 9
110 11
111 12
112 9
113 7
114 3
115 8
116 5
117 11
118 4
119 2
120 5
121+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Peter Gell is affiliated with Federation University Australia and focuses on research within Environmental Science, contributing extensively to this field with 67 publications. Their work spans several key subfields including Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Global and Planetary Change, Atmospheric Science, and Environmental Chemistry.

Their research addresses various scientific topics, mainly concentrating on Fish Ecology and Management Studies, Coastal Wetland Ecosystem Dynamics, Geology and Paleoclimatology Research, Land Use and Ecosystem Services, Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies, Freshwater Macroinvertebrate Diversity and Ecology, and Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management.

Peter Gell has published in multiple venues, with frequent contributions to Marine and Freshwater Research, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, Forest Ecology and Management, Pacific Conservation Biology, and BIO Web of Conferences.

Some of their recent notable papers include the following:

  • Using long-term data to inform a decision pathway for restoration of ecosystem resilience, 2021, Anthropocene
  • Community structure and ecological responses to hydrological changes in benthic algal assemblages in a regulated river: application of algal metrics and multivariate techniques in river management, 2021, Environmental Science and Pollution Research
  • Application of portable gas chromatography-mass spectrometer for rapid field based determination of TCE in soil vapour and groundwater, 2020, Environmental Technology & Innovation
  • The carbon stock potential of the restored mangrove ecosystem of Pasarbanggi, Rembang, Central Java, 2023, Marine Environmental Research
  • Continuing the discussion about ecological futures for the lower Murray River (Australia) in the Anthropocene, 2021, Marine and Freshwater Research

Frequent collaborators in their research include C. Max Finlayson, Tri Retnaningsih Soeprobowati, Keely Mills, Nick C. Davidson, and Lindsey Gillson.

Best Publications

  • Emerging threats and persistent conservation challenges for freshwater biodiversity

    Andrea J. Reid;Andrew K. Carlson;Irena F. Creed;Erika J. Eliason

  • A global perspective on wetland salinization: ecological consequences of a growing threat to freshwater wetlands

    Ellen R. Herbert;Paul Boon;Amy J. Burgin;Scott C. Neubauer

  • Looking forward through the past: Identification of 50 priority research questions in palaeoecology

    Alistair W. R. Seddon;Alistair W. R. Seddon;Anson W. Mackay;Ambroise G. Baker;H. John B. Birks;H. John B. Birks;H. John B. Birks

  • Regime shifts, thresholds and multiple stable states in freshwater ecosystems; a critical appraisal of the evidence.

    Samantha J. Capon;A. Jasmyn J. Lynch;Nick Bond;Bruce C. Chessman;Bruce C. Chessman

  • Diatom-inferred salinity in palaeolakes: An indirect tracer of climate change

    Françoise Gasse;Philip Barker;Peter A. Gell;Sherilyn C. Fritz

  • First human impacts and responses of aquatic systems: A review of palaeolimnological records from around the world

    Nathalie Dubois;Nathalie Dubois;Émilie Saulnier-Talbot;Keely Mills;Peter Gell

  • The use of diatoms to assess past and present water quality

    M. A. Reid;J. C. Tibby;D. Penny;P. A. Gell

  • When trends intersect: The challenge of protecting freshwater ecosystems under multiple land use and hydrological intensification scenarios

    Jenny A. Davis;Anthony P. O'Grady;Allan P. Dale;Angela H. Arthington

  • The status of wetlands and the predicted effects of global climate change: the situation in Australia

    C Finlayson;Jennifer Davis;Peter Gell;Richard Kingsford

  • The Development of a Diatom Database for Inferring Lake Salinity, Western Victoria, Australia: Towards a Quantitative Approach for Reconstructing Past Climates

    Peter A. Gell

  • Seasonal and interannual variations in diatom assemblages in Murray River connected wetlands in north-west Victoria, Australia

    Peter A. Gell;Ian R. Sluiter;Jennie Fluin

  • Accessing limnological change and variability using fossil diatom assemblages, south‐east Australia

    Peter A Gell;John Tibby;Jennie Fluin;Paul Joseph Leahy

  • A diatom species index for bioassessment of Australian rivers

    Bruce C. Chessman;Nina Bate;Peter A. Gell;Peter A. Gell;Peter Newall

  • Social-ecological systems in the Anthropocene: The need for integrating social and biophysical records at regional scales

    JA Dearing;B Acma;S Bub;FM Chambers

  • The enigma of a late Pleistocene wetland in the Flinders Ranges, South Australia

    Martin A Williams;John R Prescott;John Chappell;Donald Adamson

  • Tareena Billabong – a palaeolimnological history of an ever-changing wetland, Chowilla Floodplain, lower Murray–Darling Basin, Australia

    Peter A. Gell;Sorell Bulpin;Peter Wallbrink;Gary Hancock

  • An Illustrated Guide to Common Stream Diatom Species from Temperate Australia

    J. Sonneman;A. Sincock;J. Fluin;M. Reid

  • Palaeolimnological evidence for the independent evolution of neighbouring terminal lakes, the Murray Darling Basin, Australia

    Jennie Fluin;Peter Gell;Deborah Haynes;John Tibby

  • The Role of Substrate Type on Benthic Diatom Assemblages in the Daly and Roper Rivers of the Australian Wet/Dry Tropics

    Simon A. Townsend;Peter A. Gell

  • Anthropogenic acceleration of sediment accretion in lowland floodplain wetlands, Murray–Darling Basin, Australia

    Peter Gell;Jennie Fluin;John Tibby;Gary Hancock

  • First human impacts and responses of aquatic systems

    Nathalie Dubois;Emilie Saulnier-Talbot;Keely Mills;Peter Gell

Frequent Co-Authors

John Tibby
John Tibby University of Adelaide
Gary Hancock
Gary Hancock Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
C. Max Finlayson
C. Max Finlayson Charles Sturt University
Richard W. Battarbee
Richard W. Battarbee University College London
Suzanne McGowan
Suzanne McGowan University of Nottingham
Roger J. Flower
Roger J. Flower University College London
Neil L. Rose
Neil L. Rose University College London
Keith F. Walker
Keith F. Walker University of Adelaide
Jasmine E. Saros
Jasmine E. Saros University of Maine
Helen Bennion
Helen Bennion University College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Ecology and Evolution gives you a strong foundation in the biological sciences, but there are also numerous masters degree in counseling online options to consider. These interdisciplinary pathways let you combine your passion for science with skills in communication, advocacy, and care for both individuals and communities.

If you are interested in the intersection of biology and criminal justice, a forensic psychology degree allows you to explore areas such as behavioral science and criminology. This path is ideal for those curious about applying ecological or evolutionary principles to real-world legal and investigative problems.

For those who wish to work with youth or advocate for the well-being of future generations, consider enrolling in child psychology masters programs. These programs equip graduates to understand developmental processes—an important complement to evolutionary study.

Finally, those seeking affordable and flexible options can find numerous affordable masters in counseling programs online. These degrees open doors to a variety of meaningful careers, allowing you to make an impact in both environmental and human health fields.

Best Scientists Citing Peter Gell

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles