World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mathematics

D-Index
48
Citations
17012
World Ranking
1179
National Ranking
61

Computer Science

D-Index
51
Citations
18768
World Ranking
5210
National Ranking
243

Peter Brucker publications per year

1974: 2 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 3 publications 1978: 1 publications 1979: 1 publications 1980: 2 publications 1981: 1 publications 1982: 1 publications 1983: 4 publications 1984: 4 publications 1985: 3 publications 1986: 2 publications 1987: 2 publications 1988: 2 publications 1989: 1 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 3 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 8 publications 1994: 5 publications 1995: 10 publications 1996: 6 publications 1997: 5 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 10 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 9 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 1 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 2 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 0 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 1 publications 2018: 0 publications 2019: 0 publications 2020: 0 publications 2021: 0 publications 2022: 1 publications
1974 2022

149 publications in total across all disciplines

Peter Brucker publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Brucker sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 83 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientists 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientists 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientists 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42 publications 537+

This scientist: 130 publications — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

Peter Brucker D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Brucker sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 138 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

Overview

Peter Brucker was affiliated with Osnabrück University in Germany. Their research contributed to various areas within health professions and medicine, focusing on subfields such as physical therapy, sports therapy and rehabilitation, as well as pulmonary and respiratory medicine.

Their main research topics included:

  • Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
  • Interstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis

Peter Brucker's publication record includes work in the venue Zeitschrift für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie. One notable paper authored alongside Philipp Niemeyer and others was titled "Erratum: Empfehlungen der AG Klinische Geweberegeneration zur Behandlung von Knorpelschäden am Kniegelenk," published in 2022.

Frequent co-authors in Brucker's research were:

  • Philipp Niemeyer
  • D. Albrecht
  • Matthias Aurich
  • Christoph Becher
  • Peter Behrens

Best Publications

  • Resource-constrained project scheduling: Notation, classification, models, and methods

    Peter Brucker;Andreas Drexl;Rolf H. Möhring;Klaus Neumann

  • Complexity of machine scheduling problems

    Jan Karel Lenstra;A.H.G. Rinnooy Kan;P. Brucker

  • Job-shop scheduling with multi-purpose machines

    P. Brucker;R. Schlie

  • A branch and bound algorithm for the job-shop scheduling problem

    Peter Brucker;Bernd Jurisch;Bernd Sievers

  • Scheduling a batching machine

    Peter Brucker;Andrei Gladky;Han Hoogeveen;Mikhail Y. Kovalyov

  • A branch and bound algorithm for the resource-constrained project scheduling problem

    Peter Brucker;Sigrid Knust;Arno Schoo;Olaf Thiele

  • Review of recent development: An O( n) algorithm for quadratic knapsack problems

    Peter Brucker

  • Complex Scheduling

    Peter Brucker;Sigrid Knust

  • Complex Scheduling

    Unknown

  • Personnel scheduling: Models and complexity

    Peter Brucker;Rong Qu;Edmund K. Burke

  • A branch & bound algorithm for the open-shop problem

    Peter Brucker;Johann Hurink;Bernd Jurisch;Birgit Wöstmann

  • Job-shop Scheduling Problem

    Unknown

  • The complexity of one-machine batching problems

    Susanne Albers;Peter Brucker

  • On the Complexity of Clustering Problems

    Unknown

  • A linear programming and constraint propagation-based lower bound for the RCPSP

    Peter Brucker;Sigrid Knust

  • A branch & bound method for the general-shop problem with sequence dependent setup-times

    Peter Brucker;Olaf Thiele

  • Scheduling Equal-Length Tasks Under Treelike Precedence Constraints to Minimize Maximum Lateness

    Peter Brucker;M. R. Garey;D. S. Johnson

  • A shift sequence based approach for nurse scheduling and a new benchmark dataset

    Peter Brucker;Edmund K. Burke;Tim Curtois;Rong Qu

  • Tabu Search Algorithms and Lower Bounds for the Resource-Constrained Project Scheduling Problem

    Tonius Baar;Peter Brucker;Sigrid Knust

  • Improving local search heuristics for some scheduling problems. Part II

    Peter Brucker;Johann Hurink;Frank Werner

  • Complexity results for parallel machine problems with a single server

    Peter Brucker;Clarisse Dhaenens-Flipo;Sigrid Knust;Svetlana A. Kravchenko

  • Lower bounds for resource-constrained project scheduling problems

    Peter Brucker;Sigrid Knust

  • Complexity of scheduling problems with multi-purpose machines

    Peter Brucker;Bernd Jurisch;Andreas Krämer

Frequent Co-Authors

Sigrid Knust
Sigrid Knust Osnabrück University
Johann L. Hurink
Johann L. Hurink University of Twente
Edmund K. Burke
Edmund K. Burke Bangor University
Rong Qu
Rong Qu University of Nottingham
Frank Werner
Frank Werner Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg
Mikhail Y. Kovalyov
Mikhail Y. Kovalyov National Academy of Sciences of Belarus
Marek Chrobak
Marek Chrobak University of California, Riverside
T.C.E. Cheng
T.C.E. Cheng Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Horst W. Hamacher
Horst W. Hamacher Technical University of Kaiserslautern

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Mathematics, exploring related online degrees can expand career opportunities in fields like finance, marketing, and business administration. A growing number of programs offer flexibility and affordability, making advanced education accessible without disrupting professional goals.

Those looking to deepen their financial expertise may consider the best online masters in finance. These programs often combine quantitative skills with practical financial knowledge, ideal for mathematicians aiming to enter the finance sector.

For career changers or those seeking leadership roles, pursuing an MBA online can be a strategic move. Some students prefer programs known for speed and efficiency, such as the quickest online mba, which allows completion in a condensed timeframe without sacrificing quality.

Marketing professionals with a math background can benefit from the analytical approach taught in a masters in marketing program. These programs focus on data-driven decision-making that leverages mathematical skills.

Alternatively, candidates seeking an intensive experience may explore the one year mba, which offers a fast-track path to broad managerial competencies useful for various industries combining math and business.

Best Scientists Citing Peter Brucker

Recently Published Articles