World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Peter A. H. M. Bakker

Peter A. H. M. Bakker

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
72
Citations
34227
World Ranking
6115
National Ranking
159

Peter A. H. M. Bakker publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter A. H. M. Bakker sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 413 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 848 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 949 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 840 scientists 207–216 publications: 733 scientists 217–226 publications: 708 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 417 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 196 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 59 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 149 publications — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Peter A. H. M. Bakker D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter A. H. M. Bakker sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 316 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 899 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,025 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,149 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,235 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,162 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,130 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,031 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 714 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 71 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 72 D-Index — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Peter A. H. M. Bakker is affiliated with Utrecht University in the Netherlands. Their primary area of research lies within Agricultural and Biological Sciences, with a distinct focus on Plant Science, Cell Biology, Molecular Biology, Food Science, and Soil Science.

The scientist's work centers extensively on plant-microbe interactions and immunity, which features prominently across many publications. Other main research topics include legume nitrogen fixing symbiosis, plant pathogens and resistance, plant pathogens and fungal diseases, plant pathogenic bacteria studies, nematode management and characterization studies, and plant parasitism and resistance.

Peter A. H. M. Bakker has contributed to a number of recent papers, including:

  • "The Soil-Borne Identity and Microbiome-Assisted Agriculture: Looking Back to the Future" (2020), published in Molecular Plant
  • "Rapid evolution of bacterial mutualism in the plant rhizosphere" (2021), published in Nature Communications
  • "Pseudomonas simiae WCS417: star track of a model beneficial rhizobacterium" (2020), published in Plant and Soil
  • "Coumarin biosynthesis genes are required after foliar pathogen infection for the creation of a microbial soil-borne legacy that primes plants for SA-dependent defenses" (2022), published in Scientific Reports
  • "The secret life of plant-beneficial rhizosphere bacteria: insects as alternative hosts" (2022), published in Environmental Microbiology

Their frequent co-authors reflect active collaboration across several researchers, including:

  • Corné M. J. Pieterse
  • Roeland L. Berendsen
  • Ronnie de Jonge
  • Erqin Li
  • Yang Song

Peter A. H. M. Bakker has published in a variety of venues, with repeated contributions to bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Plant and Soil, Methods in Molecular Biology, Molecular Plant, and Nature Communications.

Best Publications

  • The rhizosphere microbiome and plant health

    Roeland L. Berendsen;Corné M.J. Pieterse;Peter A.H.M. Bakker

  • SYSTEMIC RESISTANCE INDUCED BY RHIZOSPHERE BACTERIA

    L.C. van Loon;P.A.H.M. Bakker;C.M.J. Pieterse

  • Induced systemic resistance by beneficial microbes

    Corné M J Pieterse;Christos Zamioudis;Roeland L. Berendsen;David M. Weller

  • Deciphering the Rhizosphere Microbiome for Disease-Suppressive Bacteria

    Rodrigo Mendes;Marco Kruijt;Irene de Bruijn;Ester Dekkers

  • Interactions of Deleterious and Beneficial Rhizosphere Microorganisms and the Effect of Cropping Practices

    Bob Schippers;Albert W. Bakker;Peter A. H. M. Bakker

  • Disease-induced assemblage of a plant-beneficial bacterial consortium.

    Roeland L Berendsen;Gilles Vismans;Ke Yu;Yang Song;Yang Song

  • MYB72-dependent coumarin exudation shapes root microbiome assembly to promote plant health

    Ioannis A. Stringlis;Ke Yu;Kirstin Feussner;Ronnie de Jonge;Ronnie de Jonge;Ronnie de Jonge

  • Impact of root exudates and plant defense signaling on bacterial communities in the rhizosphere. A review

    Rogier F. Doornbos;Leendert Cornelis van Loon;Peter A. H. M. Bakker

  • Induced Systemic Resistance by Fluorescent Pseudomonas spp.

    Peter A. H. M. Bakker;Corné M. J. Pieterse;L. C. van Loon

  • The rhizosphere revisited: root microbiomics

    Peter A. H. M. Bakker;Roeland L. Berendsen;Rogier F. Doornbos;Paul C. A. Wintermans

  • Dose-response relationships in biological control of fusarium wilt of radish by Pseudomonas spp.

    J. M. Raaijmakers;M. Leeman;M. M. P. Van Oorschot;I. Van Der Sluis

  • Iron availability affects induction of systemic resistance to Fusarium wilt of radish by Pseudomonas fluorescens.

    M. Leeman;F. M. Den Ouden;J. A. Van Pelt;F. P. M. Dirkx

  • Induction of systemic resistance against fusarium wilt of radish by lipopolysaccharides of Pseudomonas fluorescens

    M. Leeman;J.A. van Pelt;F.M. den Ouden;M. Heinsbroek

  • The Soil-Borne Legacy.

    Peter A.H.M. Bakker;Corné M.J. Pieterse;Ronnie de Jonge;Ronnie de Jonge;Roeland L. Berendsen

  • Determinants of Pseudomonas putida WCS358 involved in inducing systemic resistance in plants.

    Hamid Meziane;Ientse Van Der Sluis;Leendert C. Van Loon;Monica Höfte

  • Flagella of a plant-growth-stimulating Pseudomonas fluorescens strain are required for colonization of potato roots.

    L. A. De Weger;C. I. M. Van Der Vlugt;A. H. M. Wijfjes;P. A. H. M. Bakker

  • Interactions between plants and beneficial Pseudomonas spp.: exploiting bacterial traits for crop protection.

    Jesús Mercado-Blanco;Peter A. H. M. Bakker

  • Biocontrol by Phenazine-1-carboxamide-Producing Pseudomonas chlororaphis PCL1391 of Tomato Root Rot Caused by Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. radicis-lycopersici

    T. F. C. Chin-A-Woeng;G. V. Bloemberg;A. J. van der Bij;K. M. G. M. van der Drift

  • Fungal invasion of the rhizosphere microbiome

    Emilie Chapelle;Rodrigo Mendes;Rodrigo Mendes;Peter A H M Bakker;Jos M Raaijmakers

  • Rhizobacteria-mediated Induced Systemic Resistance: Triggering, Signalling and Expression

    Marga Knoester;Ientse Van der Sluis;C. M. J. Pieterse

Frequent Co-Authors

Corné M. J. Pieterse
Corné M. J. Pieterse Utrecht University
L.C. van Loon
L.C. van Loon Utrecht University
Jos M. Raaijmakers
Jos M. Raaijmakers Leiden University
Jesús Mercado-Blanco
Jesús Mercado-Blanco Spanish National Research Council
Han A. B. Wösten
Han A. B. Wösten Utrecht University
Monica Höfte
Monica Höfte Ghent University
Philippe Lemanceau
Philippe Lemanceau INRAE : Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement
Guido V. Bloemberg
Guido V. Bloemberg University of Zurich
Jane Thomas-Oates
Jane Thomas-Oates University of York
Peter Weisbeek
Peter Weisbeek Utrecht University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing Biology and Biochemistry in the USA can pave the way for a wide range of online degrees and rewarding career paths. Many students explore careers in healthcare, health technology, and nutrition due to industry growth and high demand. For example, roles in medical coding are becoming increasingly popular, as they offer flexible remote work options. If you’re curious about compensation, it’s worth exploring how much does a medical coder make to better understand potential earnings.

Job stability is a key advantage in these fields. The medical coding job outlook shows a steady increase in opportunities, reflecting ongoing demand from hospitals, clinics, and insurance organizations.

Many students begin their journey with a bachelor's degree health information management, which combines biology, technology, and business skills. Nutrition is another popular pathway; those seeking advanced roles can compare the cost of masters degree in nutrition before enrolling in a specialized program.

By considering these related online degrees and career avenues, students can align their education with strong industry demand and future growth.

Best Scientists Citing Peter A. H. M. Bakker

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles