World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
32
Citations
6606
World Ranking
7992
National Ranking
83

Pedro Segurado publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pedro Segurado sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 92 publications — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Pedro Segurado D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pedro Segurado sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Pedro Segurado is affiliated with the University of Lisbon in Portugal and specializes in Environmental Science, with a primary focus on Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation, and Water Science and Technology. Their research portfolio encompasses a variety of subjects within aquatic systems and freshwater biology.

The scientist has contributed extensively to topics including Fish Ecology and Management Studies, Aquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior, Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies, Fish Biology and Ecology Studies, Species Distribution and Climate Change, Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics, and Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes.

Pedro Segurado's recent publications illustrate their engagement with multiple stressors affecting freshwater ecosystems and the assessment of river health and fish populations. Notable papers include:

  • "Impacts of multiple stressors on freshwater biota across spatial scales and ecosystems" (2020, Nature Ecology & Evolution)
  • "The Biological Assessment and Rehabilitation of the World's Rivers: An Overview" (2021, Water)
  • "Major threats to European freshwater fish species" (2021, The Science of The Total Environment)
  • "Damn those damn dams: Fluvial longitudinal connectivity impairment for European diadromous fish throughout the 20th century" (2020, The Science of The Total Environment)
  • "Making waves. Bridging theory and practice towards multiple stressor management in freshwater ecosystems" (2021, Water Research)

Throughout their career, Pedro Segurado has frequently collaborated with several researchers, including:

  • María Teresa Ferreira
  • Paulo Branco
  • Gonçalo Duarte
  • Sebastian Birk
  • José Maria Santos

Their research has been published predominantly in journals such as The Science of The Total Environment, Water, Ecological Indicators, Nature Ecology & Evolution, and Water Research.

Pedro Segurado's body of work emphasizes ecological and environmental aspects of freshwater systems, integrating multidisciplinary approaches within environmental chemistry and aquatic sciences. Their extensive research output provides insight into the complex interactions between multiple environmental stressors and aquatic life across European and global water bodies.

Best Publications

  • Model-based uncertainty in species range prediction

    Richard G. Pearson;Wilfried Thuiller;Miguel B. Araújo;Miguel B. Araújo;Enrique Martinez-Meyer

  • An evaluation of methods for modelling species distributions

    Pedro Segurado;Miguel B. Araújo;Miguel B. Araújo

  • Impacts of multiple stressors on freshwater biota across spatial scales and ecosystems.

    Sebastian Birk;Daniel Chapman;Laurence Carvalho;Bryan M. Spears

  • Implementation options for DNA-based identification into ecological status assessment under the European Water Framework Directive.

    Daniel Hering;Angel Borja;J.Iwan Jones;Didier Pont

  • Consequences of spatial autocorrelation for niche-based models

    P. Segurado;M. B. Araújo;W. E. Kunin

  • Analysing the impact of multiple stressors in aquatic biomonitoring data: A ‘cookbook’ with applications in R

    Christian K. Feld;Pedro Segurado;Cayetano Gutiérrez-Cánovas

  • DNAqua-Net: Developing new genetic tools for bioassessment and monitoring of aquatic ecosystems in Europe

    Florian Leese;Florian Altermatt;Agnès Bouchez;Torbjørn Ekrem

  • The Biological Assessment and Rehabilitation of the World’s Rivers: An Overview

    Maria João Feio;Robert M. Hughes;Marcos Callisto;Susan J. Nichols

  • Untangling the effects of multiple human stressors and their impacts on fish assemblages in European running waters.

    Rafaela Schinegger;Martin Palt;Pedro Segurado;Stefan Schmutz

  • A global-scale screening of non-native aquatic organisms to identify potentially invasive species under current and future climate conditions

    Lorenzo Vilizzi;Gordon H. Copp;Jeffrey E. Hill;Boris Adamovich

  • Prioritizing barrier removal to improve functional connectivity of rivers

    Paulo Branco;Paulo Branco;Pedro Segurado;José M. Santos;Maria T. Ferreira

  • Using spatial network structure in landscape management and planning: A case study with pond turtles

    Miguel Pereira;Pedro Segurado;Pedro Segurado;Nuno Neves;Nuno Neves

  • Does longitudinal connectivity loss affect the distribution of freshwater fish

    P. Branco;P. Segurado;J.M. Santos;P. Pinheiro

  • Prioritizing restoration of structural connectivity in rivers: a graph based approach

    Pedro Segurado;Paulo Branco;Maria T. Ferreira

  • Major threats to European freshwater fish species

    Maria João Costa;Gonçalo Duarte;Pedro Segurado;Paulo Branco

  • Does local habitat fragmentation affect large‐scale distributions? The case of a specialist grassland bird

    Luís Reino;Luís Reino;Luís Reino;Pedro Beja;Miguel B. Araújo;Miguel B. Araújo;Miguel B. Araújo;Stéphane Dray

  • 03. Collapse of the amphibian community of the Paul do Boquilobo Natural Reserve (central Portugal) after the arrival of the exotic American crayfish Procambarus clarkii

    Unknown

  • Comparability of river quality assessment using macrophytes: A multi-step procedure to overcome biogeographical differences

    F.C. Aguiar;P. Segurado;G. Urbanič;J. Cambra

  • Population census and nesting habitat selection of thin-billed prion Pachyptila belcheri on New Island, Falkland Islands

    Paulo Catry;Paulo Catry;Ana R. Campos;Pedro Segurado;Mónica C. Silva

  • The abundance and distribution of guilds of riparian woody plants change in response to land use and flow regulation

    Francisca C. Aguiar;Pedro Segurado;Maria João Martins;Maria Dolores Bejarano

  • Estimating species tolerance to human perturbation: Expert judgment versus empirical approaches

    Pedro Segurado;José Maria Santos;Didier Pont;Andreas H. Melcher

  • Understanding multiple stressors in a Mediterranean basin: Combined effects of land use, water scarcity and nutrient enrichment.

    Pedro Segurado;Carina Almeida;Ramiro Neves;Maria Teresa Ferreira

  • Freshwater conservation in a fragmented world: Dealing with barriers in a systematic planning framework

    Virgilio Hermoso;Ana Filipa Filipe;Ana Filipa Filipe;Pedro Segurado;Pedro Beja;Pedro Beja

Frequent Co-Authors

Maria Teresa Ferreira
Maria Teresa Ferreira University of Lisbon
Miguel B. Araújo
Miguel B. Araújo University of Évora
Pedro Beja
Pedro Beja University of Porto
Didier Pont
Didier Pont BOKU University
Virgilio Hermoso
Virgilio Hermoso Griffith University
Anssi Laurila
Anssi Laurila Uppsala University
Mark O. Gessner
Mark O. Gessner Technical University of Berlin
Christian K. Feld
Christian K. Feld University of Duisburg-Essen
Daniel Hering
Daniel Hering University of Duisburg-Essen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Ecology and Evolution in the USA can open doors to exciting scientific careers—yet many students consider broadening their options with versatile online degrees. Those seeking a healthcare-related path can explore specialized programs that help blend scientific knowledge with patient care. Many registered nurses, for instance, aim to advance their roles through rn to np programs online—fast-tracking their journey into advanced practice and research.

For individuals without a nursing background but eager to transition into health sciences, online direct entry msn programs provide a streamlined path to a master’s degree in nursing. When choosing where to study, it’s essential to compare options like wgu vs chamberlain or other accredited institutions to find the best mix of flexibility, cost, and program quality.

Affordability is also crucial—especially for students seeking a seamless bridge toward advanced degrees. Resources highlighting the cheapest bsn to msn online programs can help reduce financial barriers while expanding your career possibilities in science, research, or clinical practice. These educational pathways can complement or enhance a background in Ecology and Evolution, making for a dynamic and adaptable professional future.

Best Scientists Citing Pedro Segurado

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles