World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Materials Science

D-Index
47
Citations
7166
World Ranking
11227
National Ranking
458

Paul Smith publication distribution in Materials Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Materials Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul Smith sits on this spectrum.

50–69 publications: 28 scientists 70–89 publications: 152 scientists 90–109 publications: 356 scientists 110–129 publications: 487 scientists 130–149 publications: 723 scientists 150–169 publications: 835 scientists 170–189 publications: 850 scientists 190–209 publications: 891 scientists 210–229 publications: 862 scientists 230–249 publications: 766 scientists 250–269 publications: 726 scientists 270–289 publications: 665 scientists 290–309 publications: 593 scientists 310–329 publications: 537 scientists 330–349 publications: 477 scientists 350–369 publications: 440 scientists 370–389 publications: 356 scientists 390–409 publications: 321 scientists 410–429 publications: 256 scientists 430–449 publications: 246 scientists 450–469 publications: 216 scientists 470–489 publications: 212 scientists 490–509 publications: 174 scientists 510–529 publications: 194 scientists 530–549 publications: 162 scientists 550–569 publications: 131 scientists 570–589 publications: 111 scientists 590–609 publications: 103 scientists 610–629 publications: 99 scientists 630–649 publications: 77 scientists 650–669 publications: 92 scientists 670–689 publications: 56 scientists 690–709 publications: 53 scientists 710–729 publications: 53 scientists 730–749 publications: 38 scientists 750–769 publications: 52 scientists 770–789 publications: 43 scientists 790–809 publications: 38 scientists 810–829 publications: 34 scientists 830–849 publications: 25 scientists 850–869 publications: 18 scientists 870–889 publications: 20 scientists 890–909 publications: 24 scientists 910–929 publications: 27 scientists 930–949 publications: 20 scientists 950–969 publications: 17 scientists 970–989 publications: 10 scientists 990–1,009 publications: 16 scientists 1,010–1,029 publications: 13 scientists 1,030–1,049 publications: 12 scientists 1,050–1,069 publications: 9 scientists 1,070–1,089 publications: 8 scientists 1,090–1,109 publications: 7 scientists 1,110–1,129 publications: 9 scientists 1,130–1,149 publications: 2 scientists 1,150–1,162 publications: 5 scientists 1,163+ publications: 100 scientists
50 publications 1,163+

This scientist: 213 publications — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,163 publications or more.

Paul Smith D-index placement in Materials Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Materials Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul Smith sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 211 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 450 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 612 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 612 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 598 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 657 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 667 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 621 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 597 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 610 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 587 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 606 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 533 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 490 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 469 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 378 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 421 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 359 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 323 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 299 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 230 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 210 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 195 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 203 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 175 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 175 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 142 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 121 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 117 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 107 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 88 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 85 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 68 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 62 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 57 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 45 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 49 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 50 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 34 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 38 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 28 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 24 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 33 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 28 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 20 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 23 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 17 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 12 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 17 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 21 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 13 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 11 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 13 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 4 scientists 164 D-Index: 3 scientists 165+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 165+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 165 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2002 - Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences
  • 1941 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Best Publications

  • The use of the PeakForceTM quantitative nanomechanical mapping AFM-based method for high-resolution Young's modulus measurement of polymers

    T J Young;M A Monclus;T L Burnett;W R Broughton

  • Matrix cracking and stiffness reduction during the fatigue of a (0/90)s GFRP laminate

    S.L. Ogin;P.A. Smith;P.W.R. Beaumont

  • Failure Prediction Technique for Compression Loaded Carbon Fibre-Epoxy Laminate with Open Holes:

    C. Soutis;N. A. Fleck;P. A. Smith

  • Mechanical properties and details of composite laminates for the test cases used in the third world-wide failure exercise:

    AS Kaddour;MJ Hinton;PA Smith;S Li

  • Damage accumulation in woven-fabric CFRP laminates under tensile loading: Part 1. Observations of damage accumulation

    F. Gao;L. Boniface;S.L. Ogin;P.A. Smith

  • On matrix crack growth in quasi-isotropic laminates—I. Experimental investigation

    J. Tong;F.J. Guild;S.L. Ogin;P.A. Smith

  • A comparison between the predictive capability of matrix cracking, damage and failure criteria for fibre reinforced composite laminates: Part A of the third world-wide failure exercise:

    AS Kaddour;MJ Hinton;PA Smith;S Li

  • Matrix cracking in unidirectional ceramic matrix composites under quasi-static and cyclic loading

    A.W. Pryce;P.A. Smith

  • A High-Performance Structural Supercapacitor

    Richard Reece;Constantina Lekakou;Paul A. Smith

  • The background to the third world-wide failure exercise:

    AS Kaddour;MJ Hinton;PA Smith;S Li

  • Behaviour of unidirectional and crossply ceramic matrix composites under quasi-static tensile loading

    A. W. Pryce;P. A. Smith

  • Poisson's ratio as a damage parameter in the static tensile loading of simple crossply laminates

    P.A. Smith;J.R. Wood

  • Transverse ply cracking in cross-ply CFRP laminates - Initiation or propagation controlled?

    L. Boniface;P. A. Smith;M. G. Bader;A. H. Rezaifard

  • Oxygen functionalized porous activated biocarbons with high surface area derived from grape marc for enhanced capture of CO2 at elevated-pressure

    Intan S. Ismail;Intan S. Ismail;Gurwinder Singh;Paul Smith;Sungho Kim

  • Superiority of reduced-intensity allogeneic transplantation over conventional treatment for relapse of Hodgkin's lymphoma following autologous stem cell transplantation.

    Kirsty J Thomson;Karl S Peggs;P Smith;James Cavet

  • The development and scalability of a high strength, damage tolerant, hybrid joining scheme for composite–metal structures

    D.P. Graham;D.P. Graham;A. Rezai;D. Baker;P.A. Smith

  • Effect of pore clustering on the mechanical properties of ceramics

    R.A. Dorey;J.A. Yeomans;P.A. Smith

  • Modeling the Transport of Low-Molecular-Weight Penetrants Within Polymer Matrix Composites

    David A. Bond;Paul A. Smith

  • Finite element prediction of fatigue crack propagation lifetime in composite bonded joints

    M.M Abdel Wahab;I.A Ashcroft;A.D Crocombe;P.A Smith

  • Finite element simulation of woven fabric composites

    B.H. Le Page;F.J. Guild;S.L. Ogin;P.A. Smith

Frequent Co-Authors

A.D. Crocombe
A.D. Crocombe University of Surrey
David C. Linch
David C. Linch University College London
John Radford
John Radford University of Manchester
David Cunningham
David Cunningham Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust
John F. Watts
John F. Watts University of Surrey
Erica Nol
Erica Nol Trent University
Peter Johnson
Peter Johnson University of Southampton
Richard B. Lanctot
Richard B. Lanctot United States Fish and Wildlife Service
Niels Martin Schmidt
Niels Martin Schmidt Aarhus University
Dorothee Ehrich
Dorothee Ehrich University of Tromsø - The Arctic University of Norway

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Paul Smith

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles