World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 55 4325 238 77 16909

Patricia A. Jacomb publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Patricia A. Jacomb between 1982 and 2012, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Patricia A. Jacomb published across 31 years, from 1982 to 2012, averaging 2.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 18 publications in 1997. 1 of the 80 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1982 to 2012. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 18. Peak 18 publications in 1997. 1982: 1 publication 1983: 0 publications 1984: 1 publication 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 3 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 1 publication 1994: 2 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 3 publications 1997: 18 publications 1998: 6 publications 1999: 9 publications 2000: 12 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 0 publications 2008: 0 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 1 publication 2011: 0 publications 2012: 1 publication
1982 2012

80 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Patricia A. Jacomb: publications per year, 1982 to 2012
Year Publications
1982 1
1983 0
1984 1
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 1
1989 3
1990 0
1991 2
1992 1
1993 1
1994 2
1995 1
1996 3
1997 18
1998 6
1999 9
2000 12
2001 2
2002 4
2003 2
2004 5
2005 3
2006 0
2007 0
2008 0
2009 1
2010 1
2011 0
2012 1
Total 80
Download as CSV

Patricia A. Jacomb publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Patricia A. Jacomb sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 71–80 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 77 publications — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461 77
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Patricia A. Jacomb D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Patricia A. Jacomb sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 54–55 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408 55
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Patricia A. Jacomb is affiliated with the Australian National University in Australia. Their academic profile does not currently list any recent papers, co-authors, publication venues, or book publications. There is also no detailed information available regarding main or subfields of study or specific topics of research associated with their work.

Given the absence of published papers or documented collaborative works, the scholarly output and thematic research focus of Patricia A. Jacomb cannot be detailed at this time.

Best Publications

  • "Mental health literacy": a survey of the public's ability to recognise mental disorders and their beliefs about the effectiveness of treatment.

    Anthony F Jorm;Ailsa E Korten;Patricia A Jacomb;Helen Christensen

  • The informant questionnaire on cognitive decline in the elderly (IQCODE): socio-demographic correlates, reliability, validity and some norms

    A. F. Jorm;P. A. Jacomb

  • A short form of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule: evaluation of factorial validity and invariance across demographic variables in a community sample

    Andrew Mackinnon;Anthony F Jorm;Helen Christensen;Ailsa E Korten

  • Sexual orientation and mental health: results from a community survey of young and middle-aged adults

    Anthony F. Jorm;Ailsa E. Korten;Bryan Rodgers;Patricia A. Jacomb

  • Using the BIS/BAS scales to measure behavioural inhibition and behavioural activation: Factor structure, validity and norms in a large community sample

    A.F Jorm;H Christensen;A.S Henderson;P.A Jacomb

  • Attitudes towards people with a mental disorder: a survey of the Australian public and health professionals

    Anthony F. Jorm;Ailsa E. Korten;Patricia A. Jacomb;Helen Christensen

  • A quantitative review of cognitive deficits in depression and Alzheimer-type dementia.

    Helen Christensen;Kathleen Griffiths;Andrew J Mackinnon;Patricia A Jacomb

  • Apolipoprotein E allele ∈4, dementia, and cognitive decline in a population sample

    A.S Henderson;A.F Jorm;A.E Korten;H Christensen

  • Memory complaints as a precursor of memory impairment in older people: A longitudinal analysis over 7-8 years

    A. F. Jorm;H. Christensen;A. E. Korten;P. A. Jacomb

  • Association of obesity with anxiety, depression and emotional well-being: a community survey.

    Anthony F. Jorm;Ailsa E. Korten;Helen Christensen;Patricia A. Jacomb

  • Age differences in depression and anxiety symptoms: a structural equation modelling analysis of data from a general population sample.

    Henrik Christensen;Anthony F Jorm;Andrew J Mackinnon;A E Korten

  • Helpfulness of interventions for mental disorders : beliefs of health professionals compared with the general public

    Anthony F. Jorm;Ailsa E. Korten;Patricia A. Jacomb;Bryan Rodgers

  • Health, cognitive, and psychosocial factors as predictors of mortality in an elderly community sample.

    A E Korten;A F Jorm;Z Jiao;L Letenneur

  • Public beliefs about causes and risk factors for depression and schizophrenia.

    A. F. Jorm;A. E. Korten;P. A. Jacomb;H. Christensen

  • The course of depression in the elderly: a longitudinal community-based study in Australia

    A S Henderson;A E Korten;P A Jacomb;Andrew J Mackinnon

  • Pet ownership and health in older adults: findings from a survey of 2,551 community-based Australians aged 60-64.

    Ruth A. Parslow;Anthony F. Jorm;Helen Christensen;Bryan Rodgers

  • Do cognitive complaints either predict future cognitive decline or reflect past cognitive decline? A longitudinal study of an elderly community sample.

    Anthony F Jorm;Henrik Christensen;A E Korten;A S Henderson

  • An analysis of diversity in the cognitive performance of elderly community dwellers: individual differences in change scores as a function of age.

    Henrik Christensen;Andrew J Mackinnon;A E Korten;Anthony F Jorm

  • Symptoms of depression and anxiety during adult life: evidence for a decline in prevalence with age

    A. S. Henderson;A. F. Jorm;A. E. Korten;P. Jacomb

  • Patterns of association between alcohol consumption and symptoms of depression and anxiety in young adults

    T. M. Caldwell;B. Rodgers;A. F. Jorm;H. Christensen

Frequent Co-Authors

Anthony F. Jorm
Anthony F. Jorm University of Melbourne
Helen Christensen
Helen Christensen University of New South Wales
Bryan Rodgers
Bryan Rodgers Australian National University
A. S. Henderson
A. S. Henderson Australian National University
Andrew Mackinnon
Andrew Mackinnon University of New South Wales
Simon Easteal
Simon Easteal Australian National University
Ruth Parslow
Ruth Parslow University of Melbourne
Peter Butterworth
Peter Butterworth Australian National University
Kaarin J. Anstey
Kaarin J. Anstey University of New South Wales
Scott M. Hofer
Scott M. Hofer University of Victoria

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Psychology in the USA opens diverse pathways, including social work and related behavioral sciences. Today, many students seek convenient and cost-effective options, making online degrees more popular than ever.

For those looking to fast-track their education, there are opportunities like accelerated online MSW programs in Boise. Similarly, the fastest online social work degrees in Tennessee can help you complete your studies quickly and launch your career sooner.

Affordability is often a key concern. Many students pursue the most affordable online bachelor's in social work degree programs in Pennsylvania or search nationwide for the cheapest online BSW degrees in USA, ensuring their education fits their budget.

Whether you choose to specialize in social work or another psychology-related field, exploring these online options can help you balance flexibility, speed, and cost as you build your future career.

Best Scientists Citing Patricia A. Jacomb

Recently Published Articles