World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
68
Citations
19137
World Ranking
7707
National Ranking
596

Nick D. Read publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nick D. Read sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 169 publications — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Nick D. Read D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nick D. Read sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 68 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Nick D. Read was affiliated with the University of Manchester in the United Kingdom. Their research focused broadly within the fields of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, and Medicine, with a significant concentration on Molecular Biology and Infectious Diseases.

Their published work spanned multiple subfields including Plant Science, Epidemiology, and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. Within these areas, they investigated several main topics such as antifungal resistance and susceptibility, fungal infections and studies, cystic fibrosis research advances, fungal and yeast genetics research, mycorrhizal fungi and plant interactions, fungal biology and applications, and nicotinic acetylcholine receptors.

Nick D. Read contributed to scientific literature in various respected venues. Notable publication venues where their work appeared included the Journal of Fungi, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Frontiers in Microbiology, mBio, and Microbiology Spectrum.

Among their recent publications were:

  • Phagolysosomal Survival Enables Non-lytic Hyphal Escape and Ramification Through Lung Epithelium During Aspergillus fumigatus Infection, 2020, Frontiers in Microbiology
  • The Dynamic Influence of Olorofim (F901318) on the Cell Morphology and Organization of Living Cells of Aspergillus fumigatus, 2020, Journal of Fungi
  • Cell Wall Composition Heterogeneity between Single Cells in Aspergillus fumigatus Leads to Heterogeneous Behavior during Antifungal Treatment and Phagocytosis, 2020, mBio
  • Characterisation of Aspergillus fumigatus Endocytic Trafficking within Airway Epithelial Cells Using High-Resolution Automated Quantitative Confocal Microscopy, 2021, Journal of Fungi
  • Courtship Ritual of Male and Female Nuclei during Fertilization in Neurospora crassa, 2021, Microbiology Spectrum

Their collaborative network included several frequent co-authors such as Darren D. Thomson, Constanze Seidel, Alberto Muñoz, Sergio David Moreno-Velásquez, and Nagwa Ben-Ghazzi.

The scope of their research demonstrated a focus on fungal biology, infection processes, and the dynamic responses of fungal cells to treatment and environmental challenges. This work contributed to better understanding fungal pathogenesis and resistance mechanisms, which have implications for clinical and environmental contexts.

Best Publications

  • The genome sequence of the filamentous fungus Neurospora crassa

    James E. Galagan;Sarah E. Calvo;Katherine A. Borkovich;Eric U. Selker

  • The genome sequence of the rice blast fungus Magnaporthe grisea

    Ralph A. Dean;Nicholas J. Talbot;Daniel J. Ebbole;Mark L. Farman

  • Lessons from the Genome Sequence of Neurospora crassa: Tracing the Path from Genomic Blueprint to Multicellular Organism

    Katherine A. Borkovich;Lisa A. Alex;Oded Yarden;Michael Freitag

  • FM-dyes as experimental probes for dissecting vesicle trafficking in living plant cells.

    S. Bolte;C. Talbot;Y. Boutte;O. Catrice

  • Elevation of cytoplasmic calcium by caged calcium or caged inositol triphosphate initiates stomatal closure.

    S. Gilroy;N. D. Read;A. J. Trewavas

  • Confocal microscopy of FM4-64 as a tool for analysing endocytosis and vesicle trafficking in living fungal hyphae

    S Fischer-Parton;R M Parton;P C Hickey;J Dijksterhuis

  • Role of Calcium in Signal Transduction of Commelina Guard Cells.

    Simon Gilroy;Mark D. Fricker;Nick D. Read;Anthony J. Trewavas

  • GFP as a tool to analyze the organization, dynamics and function of nuclei and microtubules in Neurospora crassa.

    Michael Freitag;Patrick C. Hickey;Namboori B. Raju;Eric U. Selker

  • Polarisome Meets Spitzenkörper: Microscopy, Genetics, and Genomics Converge

    Steven D. Harris;Nick D. Read;Robert W. Roberson;Brian Shaw

  • Cytosolic free calcium mediates red light-induced photomorphogenesis

    P. S. Shacklock;N. D. Read;A. J. Trewavas

  • Membrane fluidity determines sensitivity of filamentous fungi to chitosan

    J. Palma-Guerrero;J. A. Lopez-Jimenez;A. J. Pérez-Berná;I.-C. Huang

  • Live-cell imaging of vegetative hyphal fusion in Neurospora crassa.

    Patrick C. Hickey;David J. Jacobson;Nick D. Read;N. Louise Glass

  • The endocytic network in plants

    Jozef Šamaj;Jozef Šamaj;Nick D. Read;Dieter Volkmann;Diedrik Menzel

  • HP1 Is Essential for DNA Methylation in Neurospora

    Michael Freitag;Patrick C. Hickey;Tamir K. Khlafallah;Nick D. Read

  • The self‐incompatibility response in Papaver rhoeas is mediated by cytosolic free calcium

    Vernonica E. Franklin-Tong;Jon P. Ride;Nick D. Read;Anthony J. Trewavas

  • Live-cell Imaging of filamentous fungi using vital fluorescent dyes and confocal microscopy

    Patrick C Hickey;Samuel R Swift;M.Gabriela Roca;Nick D Read

  • Hyphal homing, fusion and mycelial interconnectedness

    N.Louise Glass;Carolyn Rasmussen;M.Gabriela Roca;Nick D Read

  • CALCIUM CHANNEL ACTIVITY DURING POLLEN TUBE GROWTH AND REORIENTATION

    R. Malho;N. D. Read;A. J. Trewavas;M. S. Pais

  • Role of cytosolic free calcium in the reorientation of pollen tube growth

    Rui Malho;Nick D. Read;M. Salome Pais;Anthony J. Trewavas

  • Role of a mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway during conidial germination and hyphal fusion in Neurospora crassa.

    Amita Pandey;M. Gabriela Roca;Nick D. Read;N. Louise Glass

Frequent Co-Authors

Alberto Muñoz
Alberto Muñoz Spanish National Research Council
Anthony Trewavas
Anthony Trewavas University of Edinburgh
N. Louise Glass
N. Louise Glass University of California, Berkeley
Michael Freitag
Michael Freitag Oregon State University
David W. Denning
David W. Denning University of Manchester
Simon Gilroy
Simon Gilroy University of Wisconsin–Madison
Mark D. Fricker
Mark D. Fricker University of Oxford
Marc R. Knight
Marc R. Knight Durham University
Wilson C. K. Poon
Wilson C. K. Poon University of Edinburgh
William C. Nierman
William C. Nierman J. Craig Venter Institute

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Biology and Biochemistry can open doors to a wide array of rewarding healthcare careers. With the rise of digital education, students now have more flexible pathways to enter health science fields through accredited online programs and degrees.

For those interested in medical imaging, online sonography programs provide students with the essential skills needed to work as ultrasound technicians, offering both convenience and up-to-date learning. Similarly, if you are looking to fast-track your education, you may want to consider accelerated radiology tech programs online, which can quickly prepare you for roles in diagnostic imaging.

Nutrition is another key area connected to biology. The top dietetics masters programs focus on clinical nutrition, public health, and wellness, leading to expanding job opportunities for registered dietitians. If you are looking for fast entry into healthcare, consider the online medical assistant programs fafsa approved, which combine financial aid options with practical coursework.

Exploring these related online degrees offers a variety of career pathways, from medical technology and imaging to patient care and nutrition, making it easier than ever to turn your passion for biological sciences into a meaningful profession.

Best Scientists Citing Nick D. Read

Recently Published Articles