World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Political Science

D-Index
30
Citations
4893
World Ranking
1162
National Ranking
42

Neil Nevitte publication distribution in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Political Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Neil Nevitte sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 10 scientists 41–45 publications: 11 scientists 46–50 publications: 25 scientists 51–55 publications: 27 scientists 56–60 publications: 44 scientists 61–65 publications: 52 scientists 66–70 publications: 62 scientists 71–75 publications: 62 scientists 76–80 publications: 79 scientists 81–85 publications: 71 scientists 86–90 publications: 82 scientists 91–95 publications: 65 scientists 96–100 publications: 85 scientists 101–105 publications: 76 scientists 106–110 publications: 66 scientists 111–115 publications: 78 scientists 116–120 publications: 67 scientists 121–125 publications: 73 scientists 126–130 publications: 73 scientists 131–135 publications: 64 scientists 136–140 publications: 45 scientists 141–145 publications: 53 scientists 146–150 publications: 44 scientists 151–155 publications: 45 scientists 156–160 publications: 33 scientists 161–165 publications: 32 scientists 166–170 publications: 28 scientists 171–175 publications: 31 scientists 176–180 publications: 29 scientists 181–185 publications: 27 scientists 186–190 publications: 36 scientists 191–195 publications: 27 scientists 196–200 publications: 24 scientists 201–205 publications: 16 scientists 206–210 publications: 16 scientists 211–215 publications: 19 scientists 216–220 publications: 16 scientists 221–225 publications: 17 scientists 226–230 publications: 18 scientists 231–235 publications: 23 scientists 236–240 publications: 17 scientists 241–245 publications: 13 scientists 246–250 publications: 17 scientists 251–255 publications: 9 scientists 256–260 publications: 13 scientists 261–265 publications: 8 scientists 266–270 publications: 12 scientists 271–275 publications: 8 scientists 276–280 publications: 10 scientists 281–285 publications: 13 scientists 286–290 publications: 13 scientists 291–295 publications: 5 scientists 296–300 publications: 6 scientists 301–305 publications: 11 scientists 306–310 publications: 9 scientists 311–315 publications: 6 scientists 316–320 publications: 4 scientists 321–325 publications: 4 scientists 326–330 publications: 2 scientists 331–332 publications: 5 scientists 333+ publications: 97 scientists
36 publications 333+

This scientist: 127 publications — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more.

Neil Nevitte D-index placement in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Political Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Neil Nevitte sits on this spectrum.

20 D-Index: 76 scientists 21 D-Index: 79 scientists 22 D-Index: 84 scientists 23 D-Index: 68 scientists 24 D-Index: 88 scientists 25 D-Index: 82 scientists 26 D-Index: 76 scientists 27 D-Index: 75 scientists 28 D-Index: 99 scientists 29 D-Index: 96 scientists 30 D-Index: 96 scientists 31 D-Index: 81 scientists 32 D-Index: 86 scientists 33 D-Index: 81 scientists 34 D-Index: 84 scientists 35 D-Index: 72 scientists 36 D-Index: 58 scientists 37 D-Index: 53 scientists 38 D-Index: 48 scientists 39 D-Index: 40 scientists 40 D-Index: 40 scientists 41 D-Index: 32 scientists 42 D-Index: 26 scientists 43 D-Index: 25 scientists 44 D-Index: 33 scientists 45 D-Index: 33 scientists 46 D-Index: 17 scientists 47 D-Index: 21 scientists 48 D-Index: 22 scientists 49 D-Index: 18 scientists 50 D-Index: 19 scientists 51 D-Index: 19 scientists 52 D-Index: 15 scientists 53 D-Index: 14 scientists 54 D-Index: 10 scientists 55 D-Index: 13 scientists 56 D-Index: 9 scientists 57 D-Index: 11 scientists 58 D-Index: 12 scientists 59 D-Index: 10 scientists 60 D-Index: 5 scientists 61 D-Index: 7 scientists 62+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 62+

This scientist: 30 D-Index — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2008 - Fellow of the Royal Society of Canada Academy of Social Sciences

Overview

Neil Nevitte is affiliated with the University of Toronto in Canada and conducts research primarily within the social sciences. Their main fields of study encompass social sciences broadly, with focused engagement in political science and international relations, gender studies, and sociology and political science.

Their research covers a variety of topics, particularly in electoral systems and political participation, gender politics and representation, and social and intergroup psychology. These areas reflect an interdisciplinary approach to understanding political behavior and social dynamics.

The recent academic output includes a paper titled Do Leader Evaluations (De)Mobilize Voter Turnout? Lessons From Presidential Elections in the United States, published in 2022 in the journal Politics and Governance. This paper explores the relationship between leader evaluations and voter engagement in presidential elections within the U.S.

Co-authorship is an element of their work, with frequent collaborators including Liran Harsgor and Elisabeth Gidengil, contributing jointly to their research efforts.

Publications by Neil Nevitte have appeared in venues such as Politics and Governance, indicating engagement with scholarly platforms focused on political science topics.

  • Do Leader Evaluations (De)Mobilize Voter Turnout? Lessons From Presidential Elections in the United States (2022) in Politics and Governance

  • Liran Harsgor
  • Elisabeth Gidengil

  • Politics and Governance

  • Social Sciences

  • Political Science and International Relations
  • Gender Studies
  • Sociology and Political Science

  • Electoral Systems and Political Participation
  • Gender Politics and Representation
  • Social and Intergroup Psychology

In 2008, Neil Nevitte was recognized as a Fellow of the Royal Society of Canada within the Academy of Social Sciences, reflecting a formal acknowledgment of their contributions to the field.

Best Publications

  • Where does turnout decline come from

    André Blais;Elisabeth Gidengil;Neil Nevitte

  • Measuring strategic voting in multiparty plurality elections

    André Blais;Richard Nadeau;Elisabeth Gidengil;Neil Nevitte

  • Politics and Professional Advancement Among College Faculty

    Stanley Rothman;S. Robert Lichter;Neil Nevitte

  • The Political Resocialization of Immigrants: Resistance or Lifelong Learning?

    Stephen K. White;Neil Nevitte;André Blais;Elisabeth Gidengil

  • ISSUE IMPORTANCE AND PERFORMANCE VOTING

    Patrick Fournier;André Blais;Richard Nadeau;Elisabeth Gidengil

  • Time-of-voting decision and susceptibility to campaign effects

    Patrick Fournier;Richard Nadeau;André Blais;Elisabeth Gidengil

  • Measuring Party Identification: Britain, Canada, and the United States

    André Blais;Elisabeth Gidengil;Richard Nadeau;Neil Nevitte

  • Accounting for the Age Gap in Turnout

    Daniel Rubenson;Daniel Rubenson;André Blais;Patrick Fournier;Elisabeth Gidengil

  • Does the Local Candidate Matter? Candidate Effects in the Canadian Election of 2000

    André Blais;Elisabeth Gidengil;Agnieszka Dobrzynska;Neil Nevitte

  • Making Sense of Regional Voting in the 1997 Canadian Federal Election: Liberal and Reform Support Outside Quebec

    Elisabeth Gidengil;André Blais;Richard Nadeau;Neil Nevitte

  • Explaining The Gender Gap in Support for the New Right: The Case of Canada

    Elisabeth Gidengil;Matthew Hennigar;AndrÉ Blais;Neil Nevitte

  • Election Campaigns as Information Campaigns: Who Learns What and Does it Matter?

    Richard Nadeau;Neil Nevitte;Elisabeth Gidengil;André Blais

  • The Civic Culture Transformed

    Russell Dalton;Christian Welzel

  • The Correlates and Consequences of Anti-Partyism in the 1997 Canadian Election:

    Elisabeth Gidengil;André Blais;Neil Nevitte;Richard Nadeau

  • Does low turnout matter? Evidence from the 2000 Canadian federal election

    Daniel Rubenson;André Blais;Patrick Fournier;Elisabeth Gidengil

  • Back to the Future? Making Sense of the 2004 Canadian Election outside Quebec

    Elisabeth Gidengil;André Blais;Joanna Everitt;Patrick Fournier

  • Does Enrollment Diversity Improve University Education

    Stanley Rothman;Seymour Martin Lipset;Neil Nevitte

  • The formation of party preferences: Testing the proximity and directional models

    André Blais;Richard Nadeau;Elisabeth Gidengil;Neil Nevitte

  • Scapegoating: Unemployment, far-right parties and anti-immigrant sentiment

    Christopher Cochrane;Neil Nevitte

  • Teach your children well: Values of thrift and saving

    C. Leigh Anderson;Neil Nevitte

  • Political judgments, perceptions of facts, and partisan effects

    André Blais;Elisabeth Gidengil;Patrick Fournier;Neil Nevitte

Frequent Co-Authors

Elisabeth Gidengil
Elisabeth Gidengil McGill University
André Blais
André Blais University of Montreal
Richard Nadeau
Richard Nadeau University of Montreal
Seymour Martin Lipset
Seymour Martin Lipset George Mason University
Ronald Inglehart
Ronald Inglehart University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Richard Johnston
Richard Johnston University of British Columbia
Christian Welzel
Christian Welzel Leuphana University of Lüneburg
Henry E. Brady
Henry E. Brady University of California, Berkeley
Russell J. Dalton
Russell J. Dalton University of California, Irvine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Political Science in the USA can open doors to a wide range of careers and further education options. Many students explore online degrees for added flexibility and affordability. Those seeking to accelerate their education may be interested in the shortest masters degree programs online, allowing them to advance their qualifications in less time.

For students prioritizing budget, attending the cheapest online school can make higher education more accessible without compromising on quality. Beyond Political Science, interdisciplinary fields like environmental science and mathematics can complement public policy or analytical roles.

For example, exploring top paying jobs for environmental science majors or considering an online degree mathematics can broaden your skill set and career prospects. Online education provides the flexibility to pursue these diverse pathways while balancing work or other commitments.

Best Scientists Citing Neil Nevitte

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles