World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Engineering and Technology 35 9053 8717 2532 2345 197 4219

Murad Abu-Farsakh publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Murad Abu-Farsakh between 1996 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Murad Abu-Farsakh published across 30 years, from 1996 to 2025, averaging 7.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 2018. 20 of the 236 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1996 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 2018. 1996: 1 publication 1997: 2 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 6 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 9 publications 2005: 12 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 12 publications 2008: 15 publications 2009: 12 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 12 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 15 publications 2017: 13 publications 2018: 16 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 11 publications 2021: 2 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 11 publications 2024: 15 publications 2025: 5 publications
1996 2025

236 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Murad Abu-Farsakh: publications per year, 1996 to 2025
Year Publications
1996 1
1997 2
1998 1
1999 6
2000 0
2001 0
2002 2
2003 3
2004 9
2005 12
2006 3
2007 12
2008 15
2009 12
2010 7
2011 9
2012 7
2013 6
2014 12
2015 11
2016 15
2017 13
2018 16
2019 10
2020 11
2021 2
2022 8
2023 11
2024 15
2025 5
Total 236
Download as CSV

Murad Abu-Farsakh publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Murad Abu-Farsakh sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 804+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 457. Most scientists, 457, have 148–157 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 188–197 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 804+

This scientist: 197 publications — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 20
48–57 35
58–67 96
68–77 135
78–87 190
88–97 259
98–107 283
108–117 369
118–127 341
128–137 386
138–147 372
148–157 457
158–167 415
168–177 407
178–187 421
188–197 378 197
198–207 403
208–217 317
218–227 346
228–237 321
238–247 260
248–257 280
258–267 240
268–277 214
278–287 242
288–297 203
298–307 166
308–317 154
318–327 175
328–337 159
338–347 99
348–357 131
358–367 106
368–377 118
378–387 97
388–397 108
398–407 82
408–417 71
418–427 64
428–437 55
438–447 54
448–457 60
458–467 47
468–477 40
478–487 30
488–497 29
498–507 38
508–517 40
518–527 32
528–537 23
538–547 28
548–557 23
558–567 19
568–577 16
578–587 17
588–597 18
598–607 22
608–617 15
618–627 9
628–637 11
638–647 21
648–657 12
658–667 9
668–677 11
678–687 9
688–697 6
698–707 14
708–717 7
718–727 8
728–737 10
738–747 9
748–757 5
758–767 5
768–777 11
778–787 7
788–797 2
798–803 4
804+ 100
Download as CSV

Murad Abu-Farsakh D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Murad Abu-Farsakh sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 107+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 426. Most scientists, 426, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 35 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 59
31 114
32 129
33 189
34 200
35 262 35
36 311
37 312
38 350
39 385
40 348
41 362
42 426
43 380
44 310
45 341
46 301
47 306
48 271
49 246
50 210
51 253
52 213
53 221
54 195
55 186
56 170
57 167
58 166
59 144
60 152
61 141
62 138
63 131
64 118
65 114
66 119
67 95
68 87
69 77
70 89
71 69
72 54
73 46
74 55
75 54
76 49
77 53
78 46
79 28
80 39
81 36
82 24
83 26
84 36
85 18
86 25
87 19
88 26
89 27
90 23
91 15
92 12
93 9
94 15
95 10
96 13
97 13
98 9
99 7
100 7
101 8
102 7
103 7
104 9
105 6
106 9
107+ 99
Download as CSV

Overview

Murad Abu-Farsakh is affiliated with Louisiana State University in the United States and has contributed extensively to the field of engineering, particularly focusing on civil and structural engineering. Their research spans across 107 published works, with notable specialization in geotechnical engineering and its related subfields.

The main topics in their research include:

  • Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis
  • Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
  • Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics
  • Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
  • Soil and Unsaturated Flow
  • Soil Geostatistics and Mapping
  • Landfill Environmental Impact Studies

Abu-Farsakh's work has been published particularly in venues such as:

  • Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board
  • Geotechnical and Geological Engineering
  • Transportation Geotechnics
  • Geotextiles and Geomembranes
  • Infrastructures

Some of their recent publications include:

  • Using artificial neural network and genetics algorithm to estimate the resilient modulus for stabilized subgrade and propose new empirical formula, 2020, Transportation Geotechnics
  • A parametric study of embankment supported by geosynthetic reinforced load transfer platform and timber piles tip on sand, 2022, Transportation Geotechnics
  • Evaluating long-term benefits of geosynthetics in flexible pavements built over weak subgrades by finite element and Mechanistic-Empirical analyses, 2022, Geotextiles and Geomembranes
  • Numerical parametric study of geosynthetic reinforced soil integrated bridge system (GRS-IBS), 2020, Geotextiles and Geomembranes
  • Exploring Artificial Neural Network to Evaluate the Undrained Shear Strength of Soil from Cone Penetration Test Data, 2020, Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board

Frequent collaborators in their research include:

  • George Z. Voyiadjis
  • Abedalqader Idries
  • MohammadAli Izadifar
  • Shengli Chen
  • Mohsen Amirmojahedi

The subfields contributing to their publications reflect a broad engagement with civil and structural engineering and related areas:

  • Civil and Structural Engineering
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
  • Environmental Engineering
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

Best Publications

  • An experimental evaluation of the behavior of footings on geosynthetic-reinforced sand

    Unknown

  • Laboratory Evaluation of the Geogauge and Light Falling Weight Deflectometer as Construction Control Tools

    Khalid A Alshibli;Murad Y Abu-Farsakh;Ekrem Seyman

  • Assessment of Direct Cone Penetration Test Methods for Predicting the Ultimate Capacity of Friction Driven Piles

    Unknown

  • Ultimate bearing capacity analysis of strip footings on reinforced soil foundation

    Unknown

  • Louisiana Experience with Foamed Recycled Asphalt Pavement Base Materials

    Louay N. Mohammad;Murad Y. Abu-Farsakh;Zhong Wu;Chris Abadie

  • Numerical Parametric Study of Piezocone Penetration Test in Clays

    Murad Abu-Farsakh;Mehmet Tumay;George Voyiadjis

  • Evaluation of geogrid base reinforcement in flexible pavement using cyclic plate load testing

    Unknown

  • Laboratory characterization of cementitiously treated/stabilized very weak subgrade soil under cyclic loading

    Murad Abu-Farsakh;Sanjay Dhakal;Qiming Chen

  • Evaluating the Light Falling Weight Deflectometer Device for In Situ Measurement of Elastic Modulus of Pavement Layers

    Munir D. Nazzal;Murad Y. Abu-Farsakh;Khalid Alshibli;Louay Mohammad

  • EVALUATION OF BEARING CAPACITY OF PILES FROM CONE PENETRATION TEST DATA

    Hani H. Titi;Murad Y. Abu-Farsakh

  • Numerical analysis of the miniature piezocone penetration tests (PCPT) in cohesive soils

    Murad Y. Abu-Farsakh;George Z. Voyiadjis;Mehmet T. Tumay

  • Computational model for the simulation of the shield tunneling process in cohesive soils

    Murad Y. Abu-Farsakh;George Z. Voyiadjis

  • Performance of geosynthetic reinforced/stabilized paved roads built over soft soil under cyclic plate loads

    Murad Abu-Farsakh;Shadi Hanandeh;Louay Mohammad;Qiming Chen

  • Evaluating pile installation and subsequent thixotropic and consolidation effects on setup by numerical simulation for full-scale pile load tests

    Murad Abu-Farsakh;Firouz Rosti;Ahmad Souri

  • Evaluating the performance of geosynthetic-reinforced unpaved roads using plate load tests

    Murad Y. Abu-Farsakh;Imran Akond;Qiming Chen

  • Evaluating the performance of very weak subgrade soils treated/stabilized with cementitious materials for sustainable pavements

    Allam Ardah;Qiming Chen;Murad Abu-Farsakh

  • Coupled theory of mixtures for clayey soils

    G.Z. Voyiadjis;M.Y. Abu-Farsakh

  • Laboratory Investigation of Behavior of Foundations on Geosynthetic-Reinforced Clayey Soil

    Unknown

  • Large-Scale Model Footing Tests on Geogrid-Reinforced Foundation and Marginal Embankment Soils

    Unknown

  • Performance evaluation of full-scale geosynthetic reinforced flexible pavement

    Q. Chen;S. Hanandeh;M. Abu-Farsakh;L. Mohammad

  • Numerical evaluation of the performance of a Geosynthetic Reinforced Soil-Integrated Bridge System (GRS-IBS) under different loading conditions

    Allam Ardah;Murad Abu-Farsakh;George Voyiadjis

  • Experimental and Analytical studies of reinforced crushed limestone

    Qiming Chen;Murad Abu-Farsakh;Radhey Sharma

  • Mechanistic–empirical analysis of the results of finite element analysis on flexible pavement with geogrid base reinforcement

    Murad Y. Abu-Farsakh;Jie Gu;George Z. Voyiadjis;Qiming Chen

  • Implementation of a Critical State Two-Surface Model to Evaluate the Response of Geosynthetic Reinforced Pavements

    Munir D. Nazzal;Munir D. Nazzal;Murad Y. Abu-Farsakh;Murad Y. Abu-Farsakh;Louay N. Mohammad;Louay N. Mohammad

  • EVALUATING THE POTENTIAL USE OF A PORTABLE LFWD FOR CHARACTERIZING PAVEMENT LAYERS AND SUBGRADES

    Munir Nazzal;Murad Abu-Farsakh;Khalid Alshibli;Louay Mohammad

  • Evaluation of bearing capacity of piles from cone penetration test data : technical summary.

    Hani Titi;Murad Y. Abu-Farsakh

Frequent Co-Authors

George Z. Voyiadjis
George Z. Voyiadjis Louisiana State University
Louay N. Mohammad
Louay N. Mohammad Louisiana State University
Sungmin Yoon
Sungmin Yoon Sungkyunkwan University
Khalid A. Alshibli
Khalid A. Alshibli University of Tennessee at Knoxville

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The field of Engineering and Technology is rapidly evolving, and online education is opening new doors for students worldwide. Many related degrees can enhance your technical skillset, including options that focus on both creative and managerial aspects. For example, a ui/ux design bachelor's degree online can prepare you for a growing industry that bridges user experience with innovative software solutions.

If you are interested in leadership roles, you might wonder, is a bachelor degree in project management worth it? This path equips you with the tools to manage complex tech projects, budgets, and teams—skills in high demand across industries.

The rise of digital currencies and secure transaction technologies has made a masters in blockchain online an appealing choice for tech enthusiasts eager to specialize in blockchain, cryptocurrency, or fintech.

Finally, for those interested in the business and management side of sports and technology, consider a sports management online degree. With flexible online pathways, you can explore diverse specializations and launch a dynamic career in technology-driven fields.

Best Scientists Citing Murad Abu-Farsakh

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles