World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
38
Citations
5168
World Ranking
8124
National Ranking
2243

Khalid A. Alshibli publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Khalid A. Alshibli sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 163 publications — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Khalid A. Alshibli D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Khalid A. Alshibli sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Overview

Khalid A. Alshibli is affiliated with the University of Tennessee at Knoxville in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Engineering and Environmental Science, with a focus on Civil and Structural Engineering, Mechanics of Materials, and related subfields.

Their work addresses a variety of topics within geotechnical and environmental science domains. Key research areas include:

  • Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics
  • Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
  • Rock Mechanics and Modeling
  • Landslides and related hazards
  • Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
  • Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
  • Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization

Alshibli has contributed to numerous publications, with frequent appearances in several scholarly journals. The most common venues for their work include:

  • Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
  • Computers and Geotechnics
  • Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering
  • Journal of Engineering Mechanics
  • International Journal of Geomechanics

Among their recent papers are:

  • Improving sand wind erosion resistance using renewable agriculturally derived biopolymers (2021, Aeolian Research)
  • 3D measurements of hydrate surface area during hydrate dissociation in porous media using dynamic 3D imaging (2020, Fuel)
  • Three-Dimensional Evaluation of Sand Particle Fracture Using Discrete-Element Method and Synchrotron Microcomputed Tomography Images (2020, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering)
  • Effects of soaking process on CH4-CO2 replacement efficiency for hydrate-bearing sediments (2020, Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering)
  • Influence of crystal structure on constitutive anisotropy of silica sand at particle-scale (2020, Computers and Geotechnics)

Frequent co-authors in their publications include:

  • Zaher A. Jarrar
  • Riyadh I. Al-Raoush
  • Wadi H. Imseeh
  • Amirsalar Moslehy
  • Jongwon Jung

Khalid A. Alshibli's expertise integrates experimental methods and computational techniques, contributing to understanding soil behavior, particle mechanics, and materials used in environmental and energy applications. Their research outputs reflect interdisciplinary collaboration and involvement in emerging topics relevant to energy resources and geotechnical challenges.

Best Publications

  • Shear Band Formation in Plane Strain Experiments of Sand

    Khalid A. Alshibli;Khalid A. Alshibli;Stein Sture;Stein Sture

  • Strain Localization in Sand: Plane Strain versus Triaxial Compression

    Khalid A. Alshibli;Susan N. Batiste;Stein Sture

  • Sand Shear Band Thickness Measurements by Digital Imaging Techniques

    Khalid A. Alshibli;Stein Sture

  • Characterizing Surface Roughness and Shape of Sands Using Digital Microscopy

    Khalid A. Alshibli;Mustafa I. Alsaleh

  • Assessment of localized deformations in sand using X-ray computed tomography

    Khalid Ahmed Alshibli;Stein Sture;Nicholas C. Costes;Melissa L. Frank

  • MECHANICS OF GRANULAR MATERIALS AT Low EFFECTIVE STRESSES

    Stein Sture;Nicholas C. Costes;Susan N. Batiste;Mark R. Lankton

  • Laboratory Evaluation of the Geogauge and Light Falling Weight Deflectometer as Construction Control Tools

    Khalid A Alshibli;Murad Y Abu-Farsakh;Ekrem Seyman

  • Quantifying Morphology of Sands Using 3D Imaging

    Khalid A. Alshibli;Andrew M. Druckrey;Riyadh I. Al-Raoush;Taylor Weiskittel

  • Influence of pore water chemistry on the swelling behavior of compacted clays

    Waddah S Abdullah;Khalid A Alshibli;Mohammed S Al-Zou'bi

  • 3D evolution of sand fracture under 1D compression

    M.B. Cil;K.A. Alshibli

  • 3D assessment of fracture of sand particles using discrete element method

    M. B. Cil;K. A. Alshibli

  • Influence of Particle Morphology on the Friction and Dilatancy of Sand

    Khalid A. Alshibli;Mehmet B. Cil

  • Strength Properties of JSC-1A Lunar Regolith Simulant

    Khalid A. Alshibli;Alsidqi Hasan

  • Experimental assessment of 3D particle-to-particle interaction within sheared sand using synchrotron microtomography

    A. Hasan;K.A. Alshibli

  • Spatial variation of void ratio and shear band thickness in sand using X-ray computed tomography

    K. A. Alshibli;A. Hasan

  • 3D characterization of sand particle-to-particle contact and morphology

    Andrew M. Druckrey;Khalid A. Alshibli;Riyadh I. Al-Raoush

  • ASSESSMENT OF IN-SITU TEST TECHNOLOGY FOR CONSTRUCTION CONTROL OF BASE COURSES AND EMBANKMENTS

    Murad Y. Abu-Farsakh;Khalid Alshibli;Munir Nazzal;Ekrem Seyman

  • Evaluating the Light Falling Weight Deflectometer Device for In Situ Measurement of Elastic Modulus of Pavement Layers

    Munir D. Nazzal;Murad Y. Abu-Farsakh;Khalid Alshibli;Louay Mohammad

  • Evolving internal length scales in plastic strain localization for granular materials

    George Z. Voyiadjis;Mustafa I. Alsaleh;Khalid A. Alshibli

  • Modelling strain localization in granular materials using micropolar theory: mathematical formulations

    Mustafa I. Alsaleh;George Z. Voyiadjis;Khalid A. Alshibli

  • Modelling strain localization in granular materials using micropolar theory: numerical implementation and verification

    Khalid A. Alshibli;Mustafa I. Alsaleh;George Z. Voyiadjis

Frequent Co-Authors

Stein Sture
Stein Sture University of Colorado Boulder
Murad Abu-Farsakh
Murad Abu-Farsakh Louisiana State University
Louay N. Mohammad
Louay N. Mohammad Louisiana State University
George Z. Voyiadjis
George Z. Voyiadjis Louisiana State University
Gioacchino Viggiani
Gioacchino Viggiani Grenoble Alpes University
Robert Behringer
Robert Behringer Duke University
Hongbing Lu
Hongbing Lu The University of Texas at Dallas
John S. McCartney
John S. McCartney University of California, San Diego
Nickolay V. Lavrik
Nickolay V. Lavrik Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Heinrich M. Jaeger
Heinrich M. Jaeger University of Chicago

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing Engineering and Technology studies in the USA opens doors to a diverse range of online degrees and career opportunities. Many students boost their technical expertise with leadership skills by enrolling in a masters organizational leadership online program. These programs help professionals move beyond technical roles into management and executive positions.

For those interested in optimizing processes or supply chains, an mba in operations management can be a strategic choice. This pathway blends technology with business acumen and prepares graduates for high-demand roles in various industries.

Flexibility is another key consideration. Many reputable schools now offer an mba online no gmat, eliminating barriers such as entrance exams. This makes it easier for busy professionals or international students to advance their qualifications.

Cost is also a major factor. Programs like online mba under 35k offer quality education at an affordable price, ensuring a solid return on investment. Explore these options to design a career pathway that supports your goals in engineering, management, or beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Khalid A. Alshibli

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles